Wolf, DM; Williamson, PA Impact factor and study design: the Academic Value of Published Research (AVaRes) score ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 91 (1): 71-73 JAN 2009
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Wed Feb 25 16:11:17 EST 2009
- Previous message: Safer, MA (Safer, Martin A.); Tang, R (Tang, Rong) The Psychology of Referencing in Psychology Journal Articles PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 4 (1): 51-53 JAN 2009
- Next message: Abramo, G (Abramo, Giovanni); D'Angelo, CA (D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea); Caprasecca, A (Caprasecca, Alessandro) Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? RESEARCH POLICY, 38 (1): 206-215 FEB 2009
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
E-mail Address: dennis.wolf at gmail.com
Author(s): Wolf, DM (Wolf, Dennis M.); Williamson, PA (Williamson, Peter
A.)
Title: Impact factor and study design: the Academic Value of Published
Research (AVaRes) score
Source: ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 91 (1): 71-73
JAN 2009
Language: English
Document Type: Article
Author Keywords: Academic value; Research; Publications; Impact factor;
Citation
Abstract: INTRODUCTION To compare the citation indices. of original
articles and case reports in otolaryngology journals and thereby determine
whether c se reports are of less interest and possibly of academically
inferior value to original articles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS All articles in two reputable UK otolaryngology
journals (Clinical Otolaryngology and Journal of Laryngology and Otology
for 2000 and 2001 were identified. Citation indices were obtained from ISI
Web of Knowledge and compared. Statistical. analysis was performed using
Microsoft (R) Office Excel 2003.
RESULTS Review articles. were cited most frequently with a mean of 5.21
followed by original articles with 4.28 citations and case reports with 2
citations, The difference in citing between original articles and case
reports was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). There was-no
statistically significant difference in citations between review articles
and original articles.
CONCLUSIONS As ease reports ate clearly of lesser academic value than
original and review articles, we suggest a scoring system incorporating
journal impact factor and a scoring multiple taking into account study
design. This facilitates easier comparison and-recognition of publications
in curricula vitae during job application.
Addresses: [Wolf, Dennis M.; Williamson, Peter A.] St George Hosp, Dept
Otolaryngol, London SW17 0QT, England
Reprint Address: Wolf, DM, St George Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Blackshaw Rd,
London SW17 0QT, England.
E-mail Address: dennis.wolf at gmail.com
Cited Reference Count: 4
Times Cited: 0
Publisher: ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND
Publisher Address: 35-43 LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS, LONDON WC2A 3PN, ENGLAND
ISSN: 0035-8843
DOI: 10.1308/003588409X359222
29-char Source Abbrev.: ANN ROY COLL SURG ENGL
ISO Source Abbrev.: Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.
Source Item Page Count: 3
Subject Category: Surgery
ISI Document Delivery No.: 401BV
DOSHI J
Variations in the application procedures for the specialist registrar
posts in otolaryngology
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY 31 : 75 2006
KMIETOWICZ Z
BRIT MED J 331 : 1426 2005
PATSOPOULOS NA
Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 293 : 2362 2005
PHILLIPS B
LEVELS EVIDENCE GRAD :
- Previous message: Safer, MA (Safer, Martin A.); Tang, R (Tang, Rong) The Psychology of Referencing in Psychology Journal Articles PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 4 (1): 51-53 JAN 2009
- Next message: Abramo, G (Abramo, Giovanni); D'Angelo, CA (D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea); Caprasecca, A (Caprasecca, Alessandro) Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? RESEARCH POLICY, 38 (1): 206-215 FEB 2009
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list