Shibata, N; et al Comparative Study on Methods of Detecting Research Fronts Using Different Types of Citation JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 60 (3): 571-580 MAR 2009
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Thu Apr 2 14:27:27 EDT 2009
E-mail Address: shibata at biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; kaji at biz-model.t.u-
tokyo.ac.jp; takeda at biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; matsushima at iijmio-mail.jp
Author(s): Shibata, N (Shibata, Naoki); Kajikawa, Y (Kajikawa, Yuya);
Takeda, Y (Takeda, Yoshiyuki); Matsushima, K (Matsushima, Katsumori)
Title: Comparative Study on Methods of Detecting Research Fronts Using
Different Types of Citation
Source: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 60 (3): 571-580 MAR 2009
Language: English
Document Type: Article
KeyWords Plus: SCIENTIFIC PAPERS; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; COCITATION;
INTERDISCIPLINARITY; SPECIALTIES; RETRIEVAL; DOCUMENTS; JOURNALS; TRACKING
Abstract: In this article, we performed a comparative study to investigate
the performance of methods for detecting emerging research fronts. Three
types of citation network, co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and direct
citation, were tested in three research domains, gallium nitride (GaN),
complex network (CNW), and carbon nanotube (CNT). Three types of citation
network were constructed for each research domain, and the papers in those
domains were divided into clusters to detect the research front. We
evaluated the performance of each type of citation network in detecting a
research front by using the following measures of papers in the cluster:
visibility, measured by normalized cluster size, speed, measured by
average publication year, and topological relevance, measured by density.
Direct citation, which could detect large and young emerging clusters
earlier, shows the best performance in detecting a research front, and co-
citation shows the worst. Additionally, in direct citation networks, the
clustering coefficient was the largest, which suggests that the content
similarity of papers connected by direct citations is the greatest and
that direct citation networks have the least risk of missing emerging
research domains because core papers are included in the largest
component.
Addresses: [Shibata, Naoki; Kajikawa, Yuya; Takeda, Yoshiyuki; Matsushima,
Katsumori] Univ Tokyo, Inst Engn Innovat, Sch Engn, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo
1138656, Japan
Reprint Address: Shibata, N, Univ Tokyo, Inst Engn Innovat, Sch Engn,
Bunkyo Ku, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Tokyo 1138656, Japan.
E-mail Address: shibata at biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; kaji at biz-model.t.u-
tokyo.ac.jp; takeda at biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; matsushima at iijmio-mail.jp
Cited Reference Count: 26
Times Cited: 0
Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
Publisher Address: 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA
ISSN: 1532-2882
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20994
29-char Source Abbrev.: J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL
ISO Source Abbrev.: J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
Source Item Page Count: 10
Subject Category: Computer Science, Information Systems; Information
Science & Library Science
ISI Document Delivery No.: 415LK
ADAMS J
Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact
SCIENTOMETRICS 63 : 567 DOI 10.1007/s11192-005-0228-9 2005
BRAAM RR
MAPPING OF SCIENCE BY COMBINED COCITATION AND WORD ANALYSIS .1. STRUCTURAL
ASPECTS
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 42 : 233 1991
BRAUN T
No-bells for ambiguous lists of ranked Nobelists as science indicators of
national merit in physics, chemistry and medicine, 1901-2001
SCIENTOMETRICS 56 : 3 2003
CHEN C
P SPIE IS T VISUALIZ : 63 2005
EGGHE L
Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice
citation networks
SCIENTOMETRICS 55 : 349 2002
FANG Y
Lattices in citation networks: An investigation into the structure of
citation graphs
SCIENTOMETRICS 50 : 273 2001
GARFIELD E
Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 30 : 119 DOI 10.1177/0165551504042802 2004
GARFIELD E
CITATION ANALYSIS AS A TOOL IN JOURNAL EVALUATION - JOURNALS CAN BE RANKED
BY FREQUENCY AND IMPACT OF CITATIONS FOR SCIENCE POLICY STUDIES
SCIENCE 178 : 471 1972
HOPCROFT J
Tracking evolving communities in large linked networks
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA 101 : 5249 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307750100 2004
KARAZIJA R
The Nobel prize in physics - regularities and tendencies
SCIENTOMETRICS 61 : 191 2004
KESSLER MM
BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLING BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC PAPERS
AMERICAN DOCUMENTATION 14 : 10 1963
KLAVANS R
Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
57 : 251 DOI 10.1002/asi.20274 2006
KOSTOFF RN
Database tomography for information retrieval
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE 23 : 301 1997
LEYDESDORFF L
Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of
scientific journals
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
58 : 1303 DOI 10.1002/asi.20614 2007
LEYDESDORFF L
Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the science citation
index and the social science citation index
SCIENTOMETRICS 71 : 391 DOI 10.1007/s11192-007-1694-z 2007
NEWMAN MEJ
Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks
PHYSICAL REVIEW E 69 : 6133 2004
PRICE DJD
NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS
SCIENCE 149 : 510 1965
SCHIMINOVICH S
AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION AND RETRIEVAL OF DOCUMENTS BY MEANS OF A
BIBLIOGRAPHIC PATTERN DISCOVERY ALGORITHM
INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL 6 : 417 1971
SHIBATA N
Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core
articles
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
58 : 872 DOI 10.1002/asi.20529 2007
SHIBATA N
Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in
citation networks of scientific publications
TECHNOVATION 28 : 758 DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.009 2008
SMALL H
COCITATION IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE - NEW MEASURE OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
2 DOCUMENTS
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 24 : 265 1973
SMALL H
STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES .1. IDENTIFYING AND GRAPHING
SPECIALTIES
SCIENCE STUDIES 4 : 17 1974
SMALL H
Tracking and predicting growth areas in science
SCIENTOMETRICS 68 : 595 DOI 10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y 2006
SMALL H
Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces
SCIENTOMETRICS 38 : 275 1997
VANDENBESSELAAR P
Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction
of the development of artificial intelligence
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE 47 : 415 1996
WATTS DJ
Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks
NATURE 393 : 440 1998
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list