Contents of Scientometrics Vol:77, No:1 OCTOBER 2008
Eugene Garfield
eugene.garfield at THOMSON.COM
Mon Nov 17 16:03:41 EST 2008
CONTENTS OF
SCIENTOMETRICS, VOLUME 77, NO:1, OCTOBER 2008
E-Mail : E-mail: brlee at kisti.re.kr
AUTHOR : BANGRAE LEE, YONG-IL JEONG
TITLE :Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using
the co-word analysis
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 3–19
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4
ABSTRACT: In this paper, we show a “Strategic Diagram” of the robot
technology by applying the co-word analysis to the metadata of Korean
related national R&D projects in 2001. The strategic diagram shows the
evolutionary trends of the specific R&D domain and relational patterns
between subdomains. We may use this strategic diagram to support both the
strategic planning and the R&D Program.
Address for correspondence:
BANGRAE LEE
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
206-9, Cheongnyangni-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-741, Korea
E-mail: brlee at kisti.re.kr
-------------------------------
E-MAIL: E-mail: mrdavarpanah at yahoo.com
AUTHOR : M. R. DAVARPANAH, S. ASLEKIA
TITLE : A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals:
Productivity and characteristics
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 21–39
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z
ABSTRACT :
This paper presents a quantitative study of productivity, characteristics
and various aspects of global publication in the field of library and
information science (LIS). A total of 894 contributions published in 56 LIS
journals indexed in SSCI during the years of 2000–2004 were analyzed. A
total of 1361 authors had contributed publications during the five years.
The overwhelming majority (89.93%) of them wrote one paper. The average
number of authors per paper is 1.52. All the studied papers were published
in English. The sum of research output of the authors form USA and UK
reaches 70% of the total productivity. Most papers received few citations.
Each article received on an average 1.6 citations and the LIS researchers
cite mostly latest articles. About 48% of citing authors had tendency of
self-citation. The productive authors, their contribution and authorship
position are listed to indicate their productivity and degree of
involvement in their research publications.
Address for correspondence:
M. R. DAVARPANAH
Department of Library and Information Science, Ferdowsi University of
Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
E-mail: mrdavarpanah at yahoo.com
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: j.m.levitt at wlv.ac.uk
AUTHOR : JONATHAN M. LEVITT, MIKE THELWALL
TITLE : Patterns of annual citation of highly cited articles and the
prediction of their citation ranking: A comparison across subjects
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 41–60
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1946-y
ABSTRACT:
High citation is associated with research quality and consequently findings
on highly cited articles are useful to increase understanding of the
factors that produce high quality research. This study explores highly
cited articles in six subjects, focusing on late citation and peak citation
years. Longitudinal citation patterns were found to be highly varied and,
on average, different from the remaining articles in each subject. For four
of the six subjects, there is a correlation of over 0.42 between the
percentage of early citations and total citation ranking but more highly
ranked articles had a lower percentage of early citations. Surprisingly,
for highly cited articles in all six subjects the prediction of citation
ranking of from the sum of citations during their first six years was less
accurate than prediction using the sum of the citations for only the fifth
and sixth year.
Address for correspondence:
JONATHAN M. LEVITT
Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, School of Computing and
Information Technology
University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, UK
E-mail: j.m.levitt at wlv.ac.uk
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: tom.vancaneghem at ehsal.be
AUTHOR : GEERT VAN CAMPENHOUT,a TOM VAN CANEGHEM,b STEVE VAN UYTBERGENc
a Catholic University Brussels – Member of the K.U. Leuven Association,
Brussels (Belgium)
b European University College Brussels (EHSAL) – Member of the K.U. Leuven
Association, Brussels (Belgium)
c Lessius Hogeschool – Member of the K.U. Leuven Association, Antwerp
(Belgium)
TITLE : A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of
the accounting literature
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 61–90
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1907-5
ABSTRACT : In most scientific disciplines, a number of divergent and often
highly specialized research areas are examined, which is reflected in
substantial differences among journal scopes. Using the accounting
literature as an example, we argue that this diversity in scopes should be
considered when assessing journal influence. Concretely, we examine a
citation-based structural influence measure for a sample of 41 accounting
journals. Next, we identify sub-areas in the accounting literature and we
explore journal influence in these sub-areas. Our results clearly
demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between overall and sub-area
influence. In addition, we show that sub-areas should be identified using a
fuzzy clustering procedure.
Address for correspondence:
TOM VAN CANEGHEM
European University College Brussels (EHSAL) – Member of the K.U. Leuven
Association
Stormstraat 2, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
E-mail: tom.vancaneghem at ehsal.be
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 61–90
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1907-5
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: chosr at skku.edu
AUTHOR : SOO-RYUN CHO
International Vaccine Institute Library, Seoul (Korea)
TITLE: New evaluation indexes for articles and authors’ academic
achievements based on Open Access Resources
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 91–112
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1834-5
ABSTRACT :
In Open Access (OA) environment where article-based or author-based
evaluation is important, a new evaluation system is needed to accommodate
characteristics of Open Access Resources (OAR) and to overcome limitations
of pre-existing evaluation systems such as journalbased evaluation. Primary
and secondary evaluation factors were selected.
Primary factors include hits and citations that constitutes composite
index. Several secondary factors each for article and author evaluation
were selected for normalization of the indexes.
To validate superiority of newly developed normalized composite index
systems compared to the monovariable index system, time-driven bias and
power of discrimination were adopted.
The results led to the conclusion that composite index proved to be a more
stable index offsetting the negative effects from one element to another
and normalization makes the composite index even more stable by controlling
the bias from external elements.
Address for correspondence:
SOO-RYUN CHO
Institute for Information Management, Sung Kyun Kwan University
53 Myeongnyun-dong 3-ga, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-745, Korea
E-mail: chosr at skku.edu
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 91–112
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1834-5
-------------------------------
E-Mail : sdxie at pku.edu.cn
AUTHOR : SHAODONG XIE,a JING ZHANG,c YUH-SHAN HOb,c
a State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution
Control, Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Environmental
Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing (People’s Republic of
China)
b Bibliometric & Research Centre, I-Shou University, Ta-Hsu Hsiang (Taiwan)
c Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Environmental Science
and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing (People’s Republic of China)
TITLE : Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 113–130
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0
ABSTRACT :
This study was to explore a bibliometric approach to quantitatively
assessing current research trends on atmospheric aerosol, using the related
literature in the Science Citation Index (SCI) database from 1991 to 2006.
Articles were concentrated on the analysis by scientific output, research
performances by individuals, institutes and countries, and trends by the
frequency of keywords used. Over the years, there had been a notably growth
trend in research outputs, along with more participation and collaboration
of institutes and countries. Research collaborative papers shifted from
national inter-institutional to international collaboration. The decreasing
share of world total and independent articles by the seven major
industrialized countries (G7) was examined. Aerosol research in
environmental and chemical related fields other than in medical fields was
the mainstream of current years. Finally, author keywords, words in title
and keywords plus were analyzed contrastively, with research trends and
recent hotspots provided.
Address for correspondence:
YUH-SHAN HO
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Environmental Science and
Engineering
Peking University, Beijing
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 113–130
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: elias at bib.uc3m.es
AUTHOR : M. LUISA LASCURAIN-SÁNCHEZ,a CARLOS GARCÍA-ZORITA,a CARMEN MARTÍN-
MORENO,a
CARLOS SUÁREZ-BALSEIRO,b ELÍAS SANZ-CASADOa
a Laboratory of Information Metric Studies (LEMI), Department of Library
Science and Documentation, Carlos III University of Madrid, Madrid (Spain)
b Observatory of Information-Related Studies (OERI), Graduate School of
Information Science and Technologies, University of Puerto Rico, Rio
Piedras Campus, San Juan (Puerto Rico)
TITLE : Impact of health science research on the Spanish health system,
based on bibliometric and healthcare indicators
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 131–146
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1922-6
ABSTRACT:
The present study aimed to determine the possible impact of medical
research on the Spanish health system. To this end, an analysis was
conducted of Spanish researchers’ scientific production, measured in terms
of the publications cited in MEDLINE, along with a series of economic,
demographic and socio-sanitary data such as the R&D resources allocated to
medical science, the actual population during the period studied mortality,
morbidity and drug spending. The results showed increases in all the
variables studied, identified the areas most intensely researched and
defined the relationship between this information and the chief causes of
mortality, morbidity and drug spending.
Address for correspondence:
ELÍAS SANZ-CASADO
Department of Library Science and Documentation, Carlos III University of
Madrid
C/ Madrid 126, 28903, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
E-mail: elias at bib.uc3m.es
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 131–146
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1922-6
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: pol at webspeed.dk
AUTHOR : MARIANNE GAUFFRIAU,a PEDER OLESEN LARSEN,b ISABELLE MAYE,c ANNE
ROULIN-PERRIARD,c MARKUS VON INSc,d
a Technical University of Denmark, Technical Knowledge Center of Denmark,
D’ARC – DTU Analysis & Research Promotion Center, Lyngby (Denmark)
b Marievej 10A, 2, Hellerup (Denmark)
c Center for Science and Technology Studies (CEST), Bern (Switzerland)
d Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance, Bonn (Germany)
TITLE : Comparisons of results of publication counting using different
methods
ABSTRACT:
Using a database for publications established at CEST and covering the
period from 1981 to 2002 the differences in national scores obtained by
different counting methods have been measured. The results are supported by
analysing data from the literature. Special attention has been paid to the
comparison between the EU and the USA. There are big differences between
scores obtained by different methods. In one instance the reduction in
scores going from whole to complete-normalized (fractional) counting is 72
per cent. In the literature there is often not enough information given
about methods used, and no sign of a clear and consistent terminology and
of agreement on properties of and results from different methods. As a
matter of fact, whole counting is favourable to certain countries,
especially countries with a high level of international cooperation. The
problems are increasing with time because of the ever-increasing national
and international cooperation in research and the increasing average number
of authors per publication. The need for a common understanding and a joint
effort to rectify the situation is stressed.
Address for correspondence:
PEDER OLESEN LARSEN
Marievej 10A, 2, Hellerup, Denmark
E-mail: pol at webspeed.dk
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 147–176
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1934-2
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: yhuang at pku.edu.cn
AUTHOR : YI HUANG, QING YANG, XIAOLAN AO
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Environmental Sciences,
Peking University, Beijing (People’s Republic of China)
TITLE : Bibliometric analysis of pentachlorophenol remediation methods
during the period of 1994 to 2005
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 177-186
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1899-1
ABSTRACT : A bibliometric analysis was performed to assess the quantitative
trend of published pentachlorophenol (PCP) remediation studies, including
both degradation and sorption. The documents studies were retrieved from
the Science Citation Index (SCI) for the period from 1994 to 2005. The
trends were analyzed with the retrieved results in publication language,
document type, page count, publication output, publication pattern,
authorship, citation analysis and country of publication. The results
indicated that degradation was the emphasis for PCP remediation. The
average impact factor of the journals was higher for publishing degradation
studies in comparison to that publishing sorption studies. And there was a
positive correlation between CPP and IF for journals published more than
two papers. The publishing countries of both degradation and sorption
denoted that most of these researches were done by USA and Canada. Two to
four authors was the most popular level of co-authorship.
Address for correspondence:
YI HUANG
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Environmental Sciences,
Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
E-mail: yhuang at pku.edu.cn
-------------------------------
E-Mail : E-mail: wolfgang.glanzel at econ.kuleuven.be
AUTHOR : WOLFGANG GLÄNZELa,b
a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Steunpunt O&O Indicatoren, Dept. MSI,
Leuven (Belgium)
b Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Research Policy Studies,
Budapest (Hungary)
TITLE ;On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-
index
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 187–196
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-1010-6
ABSTRACT : In this paper some new fields of application of Hirsch-related
statistics are presented. Furthermore, so far unrevealed properties of the
h-index are analysed in the context of rankfrequency and extreme-value
statistics.
Address for correspondence:
WOLFGANG GLÄNZEL
Steunpunt O&O Indicatoren, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
E-mail: wolfgang.glanzel at econ.kuleuven.be
Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 187–196
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-1010-6
-------------------------------
AUTHOR : SÁNDOR ZSINDELY
TITLE : From vanity fair to scientific research: The place of genealogy in
contemporary science. A scientometric approach
JOURNAL : Scientometrics, Vol. 77, No. 1 (2008) 197–206
DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-1010-6
ABSTRACT:
The place of genealogy in present scientific research has been investigated
by scientometric methods. The term “genealogy” and related words were
searched in the title, keywords, and abstracts of science journals for the
period 1975–2006. It was concluded that 1991 onward the number of articles
about “applied” genealogy has increased dramatically, whereas that of
classical (or “pure”) genealogy only modestly. In contemporary science, the
fields medicine and genetics are those who profit most from human
genealogy. More than forty percent of the medical articles containing the
search terms were from the neurology and oncology in the period
investigated.
-------------------------------
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list