Content-based and Algorithmic Classifications of Journals: Perspectives on the Dynamics of Scientific Communication and Indexer Effects
Loet Leydesdorff
loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET
Mon Dec 22 02:56:00 EST 2008
- Previous message: Jones, BF (Jones, Benjamin F.); Wuchty, S (Wuchty, Stefan); Uzzi, B (Uzzi, Brian) Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science SCIENCE, 322 (5905): 1259-1262 NOV 21 2008
- Next message: Ortelbacb, B (Ortelbacb, Bjoern); Scbulz, S (Scbulz, Sebastian); Hagenbo, S (Hagenbo, Svenja) Journal Prices Revisited: A Regression Analysis of Prices in the Scholarly Journal Market SERIALS REVIEW, 34 (3): 190-198 SEP 2008
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/classifications/index.htm> Content-based and
Algorithmic Classifications of Journals:
Perspectives on the Dynamics of Scientific Communication and Indexer Effects
Ismael Rafols & Loet Leydesdorff
The aggregated journal-journal citation matrixbased on the Journal Citation
Reports (JCR) of the Science Citation Indexcan be decomposed by indexers
and/or algorithmically. In this study, we test the results of two recently
available algorithms for the decomposition of large matrices against two
content-based classifications of journals: the ISI Subject Categories and
the field/subfield classification of Glänzel & Schubert (2003). The
content-based schemes allow for the attribution of more than a single
category to a journal, whereas the algorithms maximize the ratio of
within-category citations over between-category citations in the aggregated
category-category citation matrix. By adding categories, indexers generate
between-category citations, which may enrich the database, for example, in
the case of inter-disciplinary developments. The consequent indexer effects
are significant in sparse areas of the matrix more than in denser ones.
Algorithmic decompositions, on the other hand, are more heavily skewed
towards a relatively small number of categories, while this is deliberately
counter-acted upon in the case of content-based classifications. Because of
the indexer effects, science policy studies and the sociology of science
should be careful when using content-based classifications, which are made
for bibliographic disclosure, and not for the purpose of analyzing latent
structures in scientific communications. Despite the large differences among
them, the four classification schemes enable us to generate surprisingly
similar maps of science at the global level. Erroneous classifications are
cancelled as noise at the aggregate level, but may disturb the evaluation
locally.
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/classifications/classifications.pdf> <click
here for pdf>
_____
Loet Leydesdorff
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam.
Tel. +31-20-525 6598; fax: +31-842239111
<mailto:loet at leydesdorff.net> loet at leydesdorff.net ;
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/> http://www.leydesdorff.net/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmetrics/attachments/20081222/37522e8b/attachment.html>
- Previous message: Jones, BF (Jones, Benjamin F.); Wuchty, S (Wuchty, Stefan); Uzzi, B (Uzzi, Brian) Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science SCIENCE, 322 (5905): 1259-1262 NOV 21 2008
- Next message: Ortelbacb, B (Ortelbacb, Bjoern); Scbulz, S (Scbulz, Sebastian); Hagenbo, S (Hagenbo, Svenja) Journal Prices Revisited: A Regression Analysis of Prices in the Scholarly Journal Market SERIALS REVIEW, 34 (3): 190-198 SEP 2008
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list