Autorino, R; Quarto, et al Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology: Are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 20 (12): 996-1001 DEC 2006
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Tue Apr 29 10:48:13 EDT 2008
E-mail Address: ricautor at tin.it
Author(s): Autorino, R (Autorino, Riccardo); Quarto, G (Quarto, Giuseppe);
De Sio, M (De Sio, Marco); Lima, E (Lima, Estevao); Quarto, E (Quarto,
Ernesto); Damiano, R (Damiano, Rocco); Oliviero, R (Oliviero, Rosario);
Osorio, L (Osorio, Luis); Marcelo, F (Marcelo, Filinto); D'Armiento, M
(D'Armiento, Massimo)
Title: Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology:
Are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?
Source: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 20 (12): 996-1001 DEC 2006
Language: English
Document Type: Review
Keywords Plus: SUBSEQUENT PUBLICATION; FULL PUBLICATION; MEETINGS;
METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; BIAS
Abstract: Purpose: To estimate the acceptance rate of peer-reviewed
journals, to describe the time course of subsequent full publication, and
to identify those with characteristics associated with publication of the
abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology (WCE).
Methods: All abstracts accepted for presentation at the 2001 and 2002 WCE
meetings were identified from the published supplements to the Journal of
Endourology. The subsequent publication rate for the corresponding studies
was evaluated by scanning MEDLINE for the 5-year period after the meetings.
Results: Overall, 20.5% of the abstracts were followed by publication in
peer-reviewed journals. Abstracts on transurethral, laparoscopic, and
percutaneous procedures had the highest publication rates (25.5%, 25%, and
24.3%, respectively). Studies from North America had the highest
publication rate (29.2%). The mean time to publication was 14.6 months.
There was an 80% chance that an eventually published abstract was in print
2 years after presentation. The largest number of the reports were
published in the Journal of Endourology (75 of 234; 32%), the official
publication of the society that sponsors the WCE.
Conclusions: Only one fifth of the abstracts presented at the WCE are
ultimately published in peer-reviewed journals. Attendees should be aware
of this limitation, and scientific committees should be encouraged to be
more selective. Although presentation at major urological congresses
constitutes an invaluable method for rapid scientific dissemination,
abstracts contain data that usually are difficult to access and of
questionable validity. In this respect, investigators are encouraged to
publish their data.
Addresses: Univ Naples 2, Urol Clin, Policlin SUN, I-80138 Naples, Italy;
Santo Antonio Gen Hosp, Serv Urol, Oporto, Portugal; Univ Naples Federico
II, Dept Prevent Med Sci, Naples, Italy; Magna Graecia Univ, Dept Urol,
Catanzaro, Italy
Reprint Address: Autorino, R, Univ Naples 2, Urol Clin, Policlin SUN,
Piazza Miraglia, I-80138 Naples, Italy.
E-mail Address: ricautor at tin.it
Cited Reference Count: 16
Times Cited: 2
Publisher: MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
Publisher Address: 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA
ISSN: 0892-7790
29-char Source Abbrev.: J ENDOUROL
ISO Source Abbrev.: J. Endourol.
Source Item Page Count: 6
Subject Category: Urology & Nephrology
ISI Document Delivery No.: 123AN
ARRIVE L
Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years
after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly
RADIOLOGY 232 : 101 DOI 10.1148/radiol.2321030819 2004
BERRY E
Identifying studies for systematic reviews - An example from medical
imaging
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE 16 : 668
2000
CALLAHAM ML
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research
abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 : 254 1998
CARROLL AE
Does presentation format at the pediatric academic societies' annual
meeting predict subsequent publication?
PEDIATRICS 112 : 1238 2003
DICKERSIN K
FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 267 : 374 1992
ELOUBEIDI MA
Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic
research originally published in abstract form
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 53 : 275 2001
LARIAN B
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the
American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 125 : 166 2001
MARX WF
The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in
1993: Rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY 20 : 1173 1999
NG L
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the
American Urological Association
BJU INTERNATIONAL 94 : 79 DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04905.x 2004
RAO AR
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of
Urological Surgeons Annual Meeting
BJU INTERNATIONAL 97 : 306 DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05863.x 2006
SCHERER RW
FULL PUBLICATION OF RESULTS INITIALLY PRESENTED IN ABSTRACTS - A
METAANALYSIS
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 272 : 158 1994
SCHULMAN CC
What you have always wanted to know about the impact factor and did not
dare to ask
EUROPEAN UROLOGY 48 : 179 DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.008 2005
SPRAGUE S
Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at
annual orthopaedic meetings
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME 85 : 158 2003
THORNTON A
Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 53 : 207 2000
WEBER EJ
Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting - Why investigators
fail to publish
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 280 : 257 1998
YENTIS SM
PUBLICATION OF ABSTRACTS PRESENTED AT ANESTHESIA MEETINGS
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE 40 : 632
1993
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list