CFP workshop on Methodological Issues in Using Curricula Vitae
Loet Leydesdorff
loet at LEYDESDORFF.NET
Thu Mar 8 04:20:41 EST 2007
> The main and obvious reason for doing so was the desire to
> compare journals with similar ones, and in
> particular with others in the same field that might be
> expected to have the same pattern of citation, in order
> to prevent the unfairness of comparing impact factors across
> fields with different publication patterns. They
> do fairly well for this.
The question, indeed, is whether the journals within a set can be expected
to have the same pattern of citation. I question both this expectation and
the evidence that "they do fairly well for this." The expectation is not
warranted by an ad-hoc classification, however smart the classifiers are and
the evidence is not convincing. See my reply to Kevin about this.
My initial mail was mainly concerned with some colleagues organizing a
workshop of scientometrics at Madrid based on this erroneous assumption. I
understand that one sometimes has to be pragmatical, but not in the
scholarly debate, in my opinion.
With best wishes,
Loet
________________________________
Loet Leydesdorff
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam
Tel.: +31-20- 525 6598; fax: +31-20- 525 3681
loet at leydesdorff.net ; http://www.leydesdorff.net/
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list