Di Marco C, Kroon FW, Mercer RE "Using hedges to classify citations in scientific articles " COMPUTING ATTITUDE AND AFFECT IN TEXT: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 20: 247-263, 2006
Eugene Garfield
garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Wed Oct 4 18:04:55 EDT 2006
C. DiMarco : cdimarco at uwaterloo.ca
R.E. Mercer : mercer at csd.uwo.ca
Title: Using hedges to classify citations in scientific articles
Author(s): Di Marco C, Kroon FW, Mercer RE
Source: COMPUTING ATTITUDE AND AFFECT IN TEXT: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 20:
247-263, 2006
Book Series: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SERIES
Editor(s): Shanahan JG, Qu Y, Wiebe J
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Cited References: 36
Conference Information: Symposium on Computing Attitude and Affect in Text
Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, MAR, 2004
AAAI
Abstract:
Citations in scientific writing fulfil an important role in creating
relationships among mutually relevant articles within a research field.
These inter-article relationships reinforce the argumentation structure
intrinsic to all scientific writing. Therefore, determining the nature of
the exact relationship between a citing and cited paper requires an
understanding of the rhetorical relations within the argumentative context
in which a citation is placed. To determine these relations automatically,
we have suggested that various stylistic and rhetorical cues will be
significant. One such cue that we are studying is the use of hedging to
modify the affect of a scientific claim. We provide evidence that hedging
occurs more frequently in citation contexts than in the text as a whole.
With this information we conjecture that hedging is a significant aspect of
the rhetorical structure of citation contexts and that the pragmatics of
hedges may help in determining the rhetorical purpose of citations. A
citation indexing tool for biomedical literature analysis is introduced.
1. Scientific Writing, the Need for Affect, and Its Role in Citation
Analysis.
2. Hedging in Scientific Writing.
3. Classifying Citations in Scientific Writing.
4. Determining the Importance of Hedges in Citation Contexts.
5. A Citation Indexing Tool for Biomedical Literature Analysis.
6. Conclusions and Future Work.-
Author Keywords: automatic citation analysis; hedges; rhetoric of science;
science writing
KeyWords Plus: CLASSIFICATION
Addresses: Di Marco C (reprint author), Univ Waterloo, Dept Comp Sci,
Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
Univ Waterloo, Dept Comp Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
Publisher: SPRINGER, PO BOX 17, 3300 AA DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
IDS Number: BDW67
ISBN: 1-4020-4026-1
ANDRADE MA
title not available
BIOINFORMATICS 14 : 600 1998
BLASCHKE C
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS : 60 1999
BOLLACKER B
4 ACM C DIG LIB : 105 1999
COLE S
IDEA SOCIAL STRUCTUR : 175 1975
DIMARCO C
P PAC ASS COMP LING : 63 2003
DUNCAN EB
INFORMATION RETRIEVA : 70 1981
FAHNESTOCK J
RHETORICAL FIGURES S : 1999
FINNEY B
THESIS CITY U LONDON : 1979
FROST CO
title not available
LIBRARY Q 49 : 399 1979
GARFIELD E
ESSAYS INFORMATION S 1 : 1962 1973
GARFIELD E
NBS MISC PUB 269 : 1965
GARZONE M
P C CAN SOC COMP STU : 337 2000
GARZONE M
THESIS U W ONTARIO : 1996
COMMUNICATING SCI SC : 2002
GROSS AG
RHETORIC SCI : 1996
HYLAND K
HEDGING SCI RES ARTI : 1998
KNOTT A
THESIS U EDINBURGH : 1996
LAKOFF R
8 REG M CHIC LING SO 6 : 229 1972
LIPETZ BA
AM DOC 16 : 381 1965
MANN WC
TEXT 8 : 1988
MARCOTTE EM
title not available
BIOINFORMATICS 17 : 359 2001
MARCU D
THESIS U TORONTO : 1997
MERCER RE
P 16 C CSCSI SCEIO A : 550 2003
MERCER RE
P C CAN SOC COMP STU : 75 2004
MILLER RG
SIMULTANEOUS STAT IN : 1981
MORAVCSIK MJ
title not available
SOC STUD SCI 5 : 86 1975
MYERS G
title not available
APPL LINGUIST 10 : 1 1989
NANBA H
P 16 INT JOINT C ART : 926 1999
NANBA H
P AM SOC INF SCI SIG : 117 2000
PERITZ BC
title not available
SCIENTOMETRICS 5 : 303 1983
CITED REFERENCES : SMALL H
PROGR COMMUNICATION 3 : 287 1982
TEUFEL S
THESIS U EDINBURGH : 1999
THOMAS J
PACIFIC S BIOCOMPUTI 5 : 538 2000
WEINSTOCK M
ENCY LIBRARY INFORMA 5 : 16 1971
WILBUR W
PSB 2002 : 386 2002
WILBUR WJ
title not available
INFORM PROCESS MANAG 30 : 253 1994
Title: The frequency of hedging cues in citation contexts in scientific
writing
Author(s): Mercer RE, Di Marco C, Kroon FW
Source: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE 3060: 75-88 2004
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Cited References: 14 Times Cited: 0
Abstract: Citations in scientific writing fulfill an important role in
creating relationships among mutually relevant articles within a research
field. These inter-article relationships reinforce the argumentation
structure that is intrinsic to all scientific writing. Therefore,
determining the nature of the exact relationship between a citing and cited
paper requires an understanding of the rhetorical relations within the
argumentative context in which a citation is placed. To determine these
relations automatically in scientific writing, we have suggested that
stylistic and rhetorical cues will be significant. One type of cue that we
have studied is the discourse cue, which provides cohesion among textual
components. Another form of rhetorical cue involves hedging to modify the
affect of a scientific claim. Hedging in scientific writing has been
extensively studied by Hyland, including cataloging the pragmatic functions
of the various types of cues. In this paper we show that the hedging cues
proposed by Hyland occur more frequently in citation contexts than in the
text as a whole. With this information we conjecture that hedging cues are
an important aspect of the rhetorical relations found in citation contexts
and that the pragmatics of hedges may help in determining the purpose of
citations.
Addresses: Mercer RE (reprint author), Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A
5B7 Canada
Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada
Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
E-mail Addresses: mercer at csd.uwo.ca, cdimarco at uwaterloo.ca,
fwkroon at uwaterloo.ca
Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN,
GERMANY
Title: The importance of fine-grained cue phrases in scientific citations
Author(s): Mercer RE, Di Marco C
Source: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS LECTURE NOTES IN
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 2671: 550-556 2003
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Cited References: 9 Times Cited: 0
Abstract: Scientific citations play a crucial role in maintaining the
network of relationships among mutually relevant articles within a research
field. Customarily, authors include citations in their papers to indicate
works that axe foundational in their field, background for their own work,
or representative of complementary or contradictory research. But,
determining the nature of the exact relationship between a citing and cited
paper is often difficult to ascertain. To address this problem, the aim of
formal citation analysis has been to categorize and, ultimately,
automatically classify scientific citations. In previous work, Garzone and
Mercer (2000) presented a system for citation classification that relied on
characteristic syntactic structure to determine citation category. In this
present work, we extend this idea to propose that fine-grained cue phrases
within citation sentences may provide a stylistic basis for just such a
categorization.
Addresses: Mercer RE (reprint author), Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A
5B7 Canada
Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada
Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN,
GERMANY
IDS Number: BX29V
ISSN: 0302-9743
Title: Towards an automated citation classifier
Author(s): Garzone M, Mercer RE
Source: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS LECTURE NOTES IN
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 1822: 337-346 2000
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Cited References: 14 Times Cited: 2
Abstract: Described here is a first attempt to classify citations according
to function in a fully automatic manner, that is, complete journal articles
in electronic form are input to the citation classifier and a set of
citations with their suggested function (chosen from a previously proposed
scheme of functions) is output. The description consists of a brief
introduction to the classification scheme, a description of the classifier,
and a summary of the results of a test of the classifier on real data.
Addresses: Garzone M (reprint author), Univ Western Ontario, Dept Comp Sci,
Cognit Engn Lab, London, ON N5Y 4B6 Canada
Univ Western Ontario, Dept Comp Sci, Cognit Engn Lab, London, ON N5Y 4B6
Canada
Publisher: SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN, HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN,
GERMANY
IDS Number: BR57V
More information about the SIGMETRICS
mailing list