Barbui C, Cipriani A, Malvini L, Tansella M. "Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized controlled trial quality " JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY 67 (1): 37-40 JAN 2006

Eugene Garfield garfield at CODEX.CIS.UPENN.EDU
Tue Mar 28 16:35:44 EST 2006


E-mail Addresses:

Corrado Barbui :  corrado.barbui at univr.it


Title: Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized
controlled trial quality

Author(s): Barbui C, Cipriani A, Malvini L, Tansella M

Source: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY 67 (1): 37-40 JAN 2006

Document Type: Article    Language: English
Cited References: 20      Times Cited: 0

Abstract:
Objective: To assess whether the impact factor, a measure of the frequency
with which journal articles are cited in the scientific literature, is a
proxy measure of the quality of articles reporting the results of
randomized controlled trials.

Method: The quality of trials included in an ongoing Cochrane review
concerned with the antidepressant fluoxetine was assessed using the
Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety, and Neurosis quality assessment
instrument, the Jadad scale, and the quality criterion of the Cochrane
Collaboration Handbook. Journal impact factors were extracted from the
Journal Citation Report.

Results: A total of 131 articles reported results from 132 clinical trials
comparing fluoxetine with other antidepressants. The relationship between
trial quality and the impact factor Of journals where these studies were
published, stratified by period of publication, revealed that journals with
impact factors above 4 points published only trials with above-average
overall quality ratings, while journals with impact factors below 4 points
published both high- and low-quality trials. The Jadad scale revealed
similar quality in trials published in journals with high, medium, and low
impact factors (Pearson chi(2) = 0.298, p = .861), and the quality
criterion of the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook showed unclear
randomization in the majority of trials and in all 15 trials published in
high-impact factor journals (Pearson chi(2) = 4.678, p = .096).

Conclusion: The impact factor of journals is not a valid measure of
randomized controlled trial quality.

KeyWords Plus: ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUG TRIALS; METAANALYSES; FLUOXETINE
Addresses: Barbui C (reprint author), Univ Verona, Sect Psychiat & Clin
Psychol, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, Policlin GB Rossi, Verona, I-37134 Italy
Univ Verona, Sect Psychiat & Clin Psychol, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, Policlin
GB Rossi, Verona, I-37134 Italy

E-mail Addresses: corrado.barbui at univr.it

Publisher: PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS, P O BOX 240008, MEMPHIS, TN 38124
USA
Subject Category: PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHIATRY
IDS Number: 009ZA

ISSN: 0160-6689

CITED REFERENCES :

*I SCI INF
19842003 I SCI INF
 ALTMAN DG
Statistics notes - Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 318 : 1209 1999
 AMIN M
Impact factors: use and abuse
MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES 63 : 347 2003
 BARBUI C
Forty years of antidepressant drug trials
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA 104 : 92 2001
 BARBUI C
"Wish bias" in antidepressant drug trials?
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 24 : 126 2004
 BLOCH S
The Impact Factor: Time for change
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 35 : 563 2001
 BRAMBILLA P
Side-effect profile of Fluoxetine in comparison with other SSRIs, tricyclic
and newer antidepressants: A meta-analysis of clinical trial data
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY 38 : 69 2005
 FURUKAWA TA
Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 20 : 49 2005
 GARFIELD E
Journal impact factor: a brief review
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL 161 : 979 1999
 JADAD M
CONTROL CLIN TRIALS 17 : 1 1996
 LEE KP
Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of
clinical research articles
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 : 2805 2002
 LEFF D
Making an impact: The rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal
quality
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION 105 : 29 2005
 MOED HF
Impact factors can mislead
NATURE 381 : 186 1996
 MOHER D
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of
intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
LANCET 352 : 609 1998
 MONCRIEFF J
INT J METH PSYCH RES 10 : 126 2001
 PATTEN S
International dosage differences in fluoxetine clinical trials
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 50 : 31
2005
 PORTA M
Quality of impact factors of general medical journals - Quality matters -
and the choice of indicator matters too
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 326 : 931 2003
 SACKETT D
COCHRANE COLLABORATI : 1997
 SAHA S
Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 91 : 42 2003
 SEGLEN PO
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 314 : 498 1997



More information about the SIGMETRICS mailing list