[Sigmet-officers] Sigmet-officers Digest, Vol 4, Issue 1

Sat Feb 5 12:57:52 EST 2011

Dear Jonathan and all,

Many apologizes that I did not receive your earlier email. Thanks Jonathan
for your suggestions and comments on th.e paper contest announcement draft.
I have put your draft into a google doc so that other officers can read and
edit easily.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wxEm01vA4Hms7Lo4oMYIGjcmabZBh-izIRDvRj-AFzY/edit?hl=en&authkey=CISWzMAH#

Thanks Dr. Bar-Ilan for suggesting easychair. I have set an easychair url
for our paper contest submission.
https://www.easychair.org/account/signin.cgi?conf=sigmetspc2011
The submission url is also added in the announcement google doc.

Thanks.

best,
Chaoqun

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:25 PM, <sigmet-officers-request at sis.org> wrote:

> Send Sigmet-officers mailing list submissions to
>        sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        sigmet-officers-request at mail.asis.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        sigmet-officers-owner at mail.asis.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sigmet-officers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Is there a problem with the sigmet-officers list (Jonathan Levitt)
>   2. Re: JL feedback on the latest Google doc (Jonathan Levitt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:06:54 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
> Subject: [Sigmet-officers] Is there a problem with the sigmet-officers
>        list
> To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
> Message-ID: <577158.56358.qm at web1201.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
> ?
> Over the last few days I have sent three messages to the sigmet-officers
> list, but did not receive copies indicating that the list had accepted
> them.? However I received the Failure Notice message pasted below.? Is there
> a problem with the list?
> ?
> I would be grateful for clarification.
> Jonathan.
> ???
>
> --- On Fri, 4/2/11, MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <
> MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com <
> MAILER-DAEMON at nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com>
> Subject: Failure Notice
> To: jonathan at levitt.net
> Date: Friday, 4 February, 2011, 17:10
>
>
> Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
>
> <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>:
> Message expired for domain mail.asis.org
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with
> NNFMP; 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> Received: from [98.139.91.36] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
> 02 Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02
> Feb 2011 17:09:43 -0000
> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
> X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 176068.64227.bm at omp1036.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
> Received: (qmail 310 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2011 17:09:42 -0000
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com;
> s=s1024; t=1296666582; bh=c1CMxEz9rJk2hfKpwGV3MSKaMAQW9auac0RfSqMUIk4=;
> h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
> b=WZHJGG/CCLEfcG7dmexodBf2AfOxOJD5r/2/xJ+L1Z+9ZxpXmJfOCLPbVock0ZFQblQcGQdcm2KUO5KaVPVGXc5Taoh9ihJafyEdrLucXvoqLUcYuUlBOLT+gb1yQI96hSbZ6Ifkka3RTqrYKvz9wcZGp6IqcK7a9sQCEFtfCgs=
> Message-ID: <556934.98743.qm at web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> X-YMail-OSG: NafZ6WQVM1nIyxauNrnAVdMNUz5J3ykNMpH1e5op_SH0Ahi
> xoBdXP1doJ07ed0jL5XezvkkVkG60E9b64KkXcnQdbiZ3tL77V2T9MwJnvAH
> q0laBENpU2b6dfqL4MryyllySQvPBJJvKRzLTu759VHEJeYjbXRn4BS.VyTE
> xxbbN9LZcaK2DibeNlZtpM0bdnxHjZp9rOoZIRAvfLkBBtYjS3nO7My3mM5Q
> nnUr5imhPx1mhU3fkNsZwqTea6TBS7FER5kJfyXQrbsxUXSBvN8w0M0jFRmO
> fmmN2TD.W_NRl4YrsuYEknsniD68t_L1rU1nLxexYue6R4gVADbuBC19mqv7
> glTOFOfbZ7DiXFqnok6dDHWHfHkM9Qw_M48xtyT1J6xAm6xCKqT2gwg--
> Received: from [86.145.79.120] by web1202.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
> Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:09:42 PST
> X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:09:42 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Planning the Web-site
> To: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hWNF59TkCVbQWAwee0za3MAdysmx3OVSxmoUm at mail.gmail.com
> >
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743"
>
> --0-1314625945-1296666582=:98743
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Dear all,
> =C2=A0
> I have looked at the Google doc on Web-site and on most points we seem to
> h=
> ave reached a strong consensus.
> =C2=A0
> To me there are only two points that need further clarification:
> (a)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Officers: Four of the officers
> have=
> provided an email address and affiliation; Stasa and Chaoqun have not prov=
> ided an email address or affiliation, and Dietmar has provided only an
> emai=
> l address in (which is in different format from that of the other
> officers)=
> .=C2=A0 I suggest that the Web-site provides similar information on each
> of=
> ficer.
> (b)=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Email list: Whilst we acknowledge the
> hos=
> ting of the SIGMETRICS list, we do not acknowledge the moderator.=C2=A0 I
> s=
> uggest that we also acknowledge Gretchen Whitney.=20
> =C2=A0
> Angela, could you please draft a prototype for the Web-site?
> =C2=A0
> Best regards,
> Jonathan.
> =C2=A0
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110205/b669aa0c/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:25:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] JL feedback on the latest Google doc
> To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
> Message-ID: <85997.52647.qm at web1201.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear all,
> ?
> Encouraged by the fact that I received my message to list, I am sending
> again the messages I sent earlier this week.
> ?
> Thanks Judit fort your information on conference systems; EasyChair seems
> particularly attractive, as is free and used by ISSI.? Thanks Dick for
> clarifying the rules regarding submissions to the AM; I am pleased that what
> we have in mind does not preclude people from submitting to the AM.? Thanks
> Cassidy for contacting I have emailed KT regarding SIG funding, and for
> offering to let us know when you have a response.
> ?
> Best regards,
> Jonathan.
>
> --- On Sat, 29/1/11, Judit Bar-Ilan <barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il> wrote:
>
>
> From: Judit Bar-Ilan <barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il>
> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] JL feedback on the latest Google doc
> To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
> Date: Saturday, 29 January, 2011, 10:41
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
> If ASIST does not provide us with a submission website, we can apply for an
> account on the easychair conference system. It is free and quite widely
> used, and rather easy to set up (http://www.easychair.org/). There are
> many other free conference submission and reviewing systems, but this is the
> one I am most acquainted with. ASIST uses the START system, which is not
> free.
> Regards,
> Judit
> ?
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <sigmet-officers-request at asis.org>
> wrote:
>
> Send Sigmet-officers mailing list submissions to
> ? ? ? ?sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> ? ? ? ?http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ? ? ? ?sigmet-officers-request at mail.asis.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ? ? ? ?sigmet-officers-owner at mail.asis.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sigmet-officers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> ? 1. Paper contest: JL feedback on the latest Google ? doc
> ? ? ?(Jonathan Levitt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 06:50:43 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
> Subject: [Sigmet-officers] Paper contest: JL feedback on the latest
> ? ? ? ?Google ?doc
> To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
> Message-ID: <29060.39634.qm at web1212.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> Dear all,
> ?
> Here is my feedback on the latest draft of the Google doc:
> (1)?? Initial paragraph: We have omitted to describe anything about
> ourselves or refer the reader to our Web-site; conferences often do one or
> both of these.
> (2)?? Selection -> There will be up to 3 winners: I responded to this in my
> feedback on point (1), posted to this list earlier today.
> (3)?? Selection -> These experts will place emphasis on originality of
> presented concept(s), place emphasis on originality of presented concept(s),
> applicability to the qualification criteria set forth, practical
> applications of the concept, and suitability for presentation at the ASIS&T
> Meeting: Whilst it may be useful to specify the selection criteria I think
> that any the selection criteria should be fully debated in this list.? As a
> full discussion will add to the number of ongoing issues and could delay the
> announcement of this contest, I suggest that we omit this sentence from the
> initial call, but add a section on this to subsequent calls once we have
> reached a consensus.?
> (4)?? Prizes-> each winner: If we adopt the approach in my feedback on
> point (1), posted to this list earlier today, we would need to change our
> reference to ?each winner?.?
> (5)?? Prizes -> first paragraph: As I see it we are unlikely to get more
> from ASIS&T than the amount we asked for, so it is important that the total
> cost does not exceed the amount for which Cassidy applied.
> (6)?? Prizes -> The selected winner will be notified via e-mail and will be
> expected to present their paper at the SIGMET Workshop at the 2011 ASIS&T
> annual conference, where a formal recognition of the winner and presentation
> of the award will be made.? Award winners will be required to sign a
> presenter agreement. The SIG/MET reserves the right, at its discretion, to
> not to present an award: I am not happy about this requirement for two
> reasons: (a) we are not offering to fund the attendance of the workshop, so
> how can we penalize a strong candidate for not having the funds to attend
> and (b) it is not certain that we will be holding a workshop, as this we
> have not received approval (to quote Dietmar ?we won't know before late June
> if it's accepted?).
> (7)?? Format: We have not stipulated the expected length of the
> submissions; typically conference submissions do so
> (8)?? Submission and Deadline -> The research should be original works and
> has not been submitted to or published by other conferences (but not ASIS&T)
> or journals by the time it is submitted: I responded to this in my feedback
> on point (2), posted to this list earlier today.
> (9)?? Submission and Deadline -> April 30, 2011: I responded to this in my
> feedback on point (4), posted to this list earlier today.
> (10) Submission and Deadline: We have omitted to describe the procedure for
> submitting (it would be very helpful if ASIS&T could set up a site for
> receiving our submissions ? does anyone know if this is possible?);
> typically conferences provide this.
> ?
> Best regards,
> Jonathan.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110128/267073e4/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigmet-officers mailing list
> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>
>
> End of Sigmet-officers Digest, Vol 3, Issue 17
> **********************************************
>
>
>
> --
> Judit Bar-Ilan
> Head of Department
> Department of Information Science
> Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel
> Tel: 972-3-5318351 Fax: 972-3-7384027
> email: barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigmet-officers mailing list
> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110205/f4b38620/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigmet-officers mailing list
> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>
>
> End of Sigmet-officers Digest, Vol 4, Issue 1
> *********************************************
>

-- 
Chaoqun Ni
School of Library & Information Science, Indiana University
1320 East 10th Street, Herman B Wells Library
Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110205/2a47f5d4/attachment-0001.html 