[Sigmet-officers] Webinar

Sat Aug 20 19:44:27 EDT 2011

--- On Sat, 20/8/11, Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webinar
To: "Dietmar Wolfram" <dwolfram at uwm.edu>
Cc: sigmet-officers at asis.org, "Judit Bar-Ilan" <barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il>
Date: Saturday, 20 August, 2011, 18:35

Yes, we could certainly invite Katy.

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Dietmar Wolfram <dwolfram at uwm.edu> wrote:
> I like the idea of showing a couple of perspectives. The webinar could begin with an overview followed by a demonstration of some tools. Perhaps some of the work colleagues at Indiana U. are doing could be highlighted.
>
> Dietmar
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cassidy Sugimoto" <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
> To: "Dietmar Wolfram" <dwolfram at uwm.edu>
> Cc: "Judit Bar-Ilan" <barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il>, sigmet-officers at asis.org
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 10:05:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webinar
>
> Would we want a single presenter, or a few presenters each showing off
> their tools?
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dietmar Wolfram <dwolfram at uwm.edu> wrote:
>> I guess the topic of the webinar should reflect the type of audience we are
>> trying to attract. A debate on a current topic of interest would likely
>> attract current researchers in the field if presented at a technical level,
>> who may or may not already be members of the SIG. An introductory topic
>> would be good for attracting potentially new members to the SIG. I also like
>> Cassidy's idea of a introductory webinar on science mapping tools. It's a
>> timely topic and the introductory level will make it appropriate for a
>> broader audience.  If I recall, we have colleagues working in this area at
>> places like Indiana, Drexel, and Leiden, among others.
>>
>> Dietmar
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Judit Bar-Ilan" <barilaj at mail.biu.ac.il>
>> To: sigmet-officers at asis.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 7:59:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webinar
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I like Cassidy's idea of an introductory webinar instead of a debate.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Judit
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:36 AM, sigmet-officers-request at asis.org
>> <sigmet-officers-request at asis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Send Sigmet-officers mailing list submissions to
>>>        sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>        http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>        sigmet-officers-request at mail.asis.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>        sigmet-officers-owner at mail.asis.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Sigmet-officers digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>   1. Re: Webmar debate: topic and speakers (Jonathan Levitt)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
>>> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>> To: SIG/MET <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>        <1313368587.5502.YahooMailClassic at web1215.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Just to clarify my remark: ?I suggest that when Dietmar contacts the
>>> speakers he asks them to give talks at an introductory level and seeks to
>>> find a topic that on which a range of experts are happy to talk.?
>>> ?
>>> This is only a suggestion based on very limited time t think about how to
>>> proceed.? If the officers consider that Cassidy?s suggestion or a third
>>> proposal is more appropriate please follow what you think is best.? In the
>>> interim feel free to advance the discussion without me.
>>> ?
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 14/8/11, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>> To: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Sunday, 14 August, 2011, 20:42
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> ?
>>> I am due to leave for the airport in less than nine hours and besides
>>> getting a night?s sleep have a stack of things to sort out, including last
>>> minute suggested changes to the annual report.? I suggest that when Dietmar
>>> contacts the speakers he asks them to give talks at an introductory level
>>> and seeks to find a topic that on which a range of experts are happy to
>>> talk.?
>>> ?
>>> Must rush; hope to be in email contact soon.
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 14/8/11, Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>> To:
>>> Cc: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Sunday, 14 August, 2011, 19:42
>>>
>>>
>>> A few thoughts: my own impression is echoed in the response by the two
>>> people you approached--"visualization" is a huge topic and must be narrowed.
>>> Also, the concept of "visualization" does not lend itself to a debate as
>>> originally planned. However, this might be suitable for a nice introductory
>>> webinar with one individual speaking, rather than multiple. Looking over the
>>> revenue generated by previous ASIS&T webinars, it seems that the intro to IA
>>> was one of the most popular. Perhaps we could frame this as "An Intro to
>>> science mapping: tools, techniques and data sources"? Would it be possible
>>> to find a single speaker to do this? I could image this being both popular
>>> and revenue generating. I see a panel or debate on this topic less fruitful.
>>>
>>> Cassidy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> I emailed Katy Borner, Kevin Boyack and Loet Leydesdorff enquiring whether
>>> they were interested in speaking on a Webmar on visualization, and inviting
>>> them to suggest suitable topics and speakers for such a debate.? Kevin and
>>> Loet replied (contents pasted below).
>>> ?
>>> >From their feedback, I infer:
>>> (a)?????? A Webmar on visualization would benefit from including Chaomei
>>> Chen (in addition to Katy, Kevin and Loet).?
>>> (b)????? Different people (e.g., Katy and Kevin) specialize in very
>>> different aspects of visualization, so in order to get a wide spectrum of
>>> specialists on board we need to allow the speakers considerable freedom in
>>> the content of their presentation.
>>> ?
>>> Based on previous correspondence, I suggest:
>>>
>>> Time of day: 2 p.m. EST.
>>> Date of week: Friday.
>>> Month: September or October, on a date that suits Dietmar and the
>>> speakers.
>>>
>>> Speakers: Preferably one from Europe and ne from North America.
>>>
>>> Cost: About $15 for students, members of ASIST, members or ISSI; $49 for
>>> others.
>>> Moderator: Dietmar has agreed to moderate.
>>> Topic: Visualization.
>>> Format: On July 26, I wrote that the format is still to be decided adding
>>> ?I welcome suggestions from the officers ? on other matters such as the
>>> format.?? As I have not received any feedback regarding format, I suggest
>>> that Dietmar asks the potential speakers for their input on the format.? One
>>> possible format is:
>>> (a)?????? Introduction of the speakers by the moderator.
>>> (b)????? Presentations by three or four speakers on topics that may be of
>>> interest.
>>> (c)?????? A questions and answers session.
>>> ?
>>> In order to take things forward I suggest that Dietmar, the moderato of
>>> this Webmar, formally invites Chaomei Chen, Katy Borner, Kevin Boyack and
>>> Loet Leydesdorff to participate in a Webmar on visualization and seeks to
>>> finalize dates, format and content that suits as many potential speakers as
>>> possible.? As I think we should press on with the Webmar, if you do not
>>> agree with this suggestion, could you please let the list know by Sunday.
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> Jonathan.
>>> ?
>>> Response from Kevin Boyack
>>> ?
>>> Hi Jonathon,
>>> ?
>>> I would also like to find out more about what you mean by
>>> "visualization".? What definition of visualization will this debate be based
>>> upon? To most people, visualization is the end product - the actual visual.
>>> To me, visualization is all about the process of classification, similarity,
>>> etc. - the processing that enables a meaningful visual representation of the
>>> data.? The visual at the end is important, but to me is just the final step
>>> in a multi-step process.
>>> ?
>>> Your second question, about aspects of visualization, makes me think this
>>> debate is about the visuals rather than the process. If that is the case,
>>> then I'm not really the right person for this debate. There are aspects
>>> around color, shape, visual design, cognition, etc. that are actual
>>> visualization aspects. I know very little about those things.
>>> ?
>>> I would suggest that you talk to Katy Borner about this. She is very
>>> qualified, and is more interested in the actual visuals and aspects of
>>> visualization than am I. Chaomei Chen should also be consulted - he is,
>>> after all, the editor of the Information Visualization journal, and would
>>> certainly be able to suggest others.
>>> ?
>>> If the basis of this debate will be the larger process, then I would be
>>> happy to participate if it does not conflict with my schedule.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Kevin
>>> ?
>>> Response from Loet Leydesdorff
>>> ?
>>> Dear Jonathan,
>>> ?
>>> I apologize for not attending the meeting. It must have slipped my mind.
>>> ?
>>> 1. Yes, it seems nice to me to discuss online visualization issues with
>>> our colleagues. I have a preference for an email list because then one can
>>> contribute at one's own time and speed.
>>> ?
>>> 2. Katy Borner used one of my visualization for the exhibits:
>>> ?The Emergence of Nanotechnology?, Places & Spaces: Mapping Science
>>> Exhibit; launched at Nov 16-17, Royal Society Global Science Report Launch
>>> Conference, Kavli Royal Society International Center, London, England (David
>>> Stilgoe and Katy B?rner); online at
>>> http://scimaps.org/maps/map/the_emergence_of_nan_121/
>>> ?
>>> It is based on the animation at
>>> http://www.leydesdorff.net/journals/nanotech/ .
>>> ?
>>> Thank you for keeping me posted.
>>> ?
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Loet
>>> ?
>>> ?
>>>
>>> --- On Mon, 1/8/11, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>>
>>> To: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Monday, 1 August, 2011, 8:07
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Thanks Judit and Cassidy for your feedback.? Faced with the divergent
>>> perspectives, I have decided to follow my own judgment and pursue
>>> visualization.? However, out of fairness to Cassidy, I present my response
>>> to her feedback.
>>>
>>> ?
>>> Cassidy wrote ?I don't think we should abandon this topic before we've had
>>> true brainstorming on it.?? SIG/MET is not abandoning your suggestion, just
>>> not using it this time (as we are short of time and must settle on a topic
>>> soon if I am to keep to my schedule for the SIG). ?We have allowed plenty of
>>> time fort brainstorming.? Cassidy, Ronald and I spent about 15 minutes
>>> discussing the topic and, as Cassidy wrote in her notes, ?The topic that
>>> received the most discussion was expanding on Eric Archambault?s criticisms
>>> of Jonathan Adam?s Book Citation Index presentation. ?We discussed
>>> approaching Eric Archambault to do the con, but could not think of anyone to
>>> do the pro.?? In addition, Cassidy has had three further weeks to provide
>>> convincing evidence in support of her suggestion.? Cassidy provides a list
>>> of people who have ?talked about humanities research and who use ISI?; in my
>>> judgment it would devalue our webmar to not insist on
>>>  more stringent selection criteria than speakers having ?talked about
>>> humanities research and who use ISI.??
>>> ?
>>> Cassidy wrote ?While I'm willing to do a webinar on visualization, I think
>>> we will have a much broader audience on the topic of the Book Citation
>>> Index.?? In view of Cassidy?s concerns that ?visualization may not be of
>>> sufficient interest, I suggest that I contact at least one expert in
>>> visualization, such as Katy B?rner, for feedback on aspects of visualization
>>> that ?are suitable for a SIG/MET webmar.? I plan to do this tomorrow, so if
>>> any officer wants to have some input on this plan of action, could you
>>> please respond today.
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>> --- On Sun, 31/7/11, Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Cassidy Sugimoto <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>> To: "Jonathan Levitt" <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Cc: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Sunday, 31 July, 2011, 14:11
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all:
>>>
>>> While I'm willing to do a webinar on visualization, I think we will have a
>>> much broader audience on the topic of the Book Citation Index as this is a
>>> new thing and very interesting to not only scientometricians, but also
>>> librarians, policy makers, and humanities scholars. It should not be
>>> difficult to come up with a name of someone who uses ISI products for
>>> research and who can speak to the benefit of them (what would most of us be
>>> doing without the Web of Science?). Some names that come to mind (people who
>>> have talked about humanities research and who use ISI):
>>>
>>> Howard White
>>> Kate McCain
>>> Bjorn Hammarfelt
>>> Dana Hicks
>>> Alan Porter
>>> Loet Leydesdorff
>>> Vincent Lariviere
>>>
>>> The list is much longer, but this is a start. I don't think we should
>>> abandon this topic before we've had true brainstorming on it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Cassidy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Following on from my posting, Cassidy wrote ?I think it would be nice to
>>> have Jonathan do a 5 minute introduction to the topic, but not represent the
>>> pro as he represents a commercial interest.? The topic, suggested by
>>> Cassidy, is not related to my research and I attended neither Jonathan
>>> Adams? talk nor Eric?s response; in addition, as we should arrange speakers
>>> ASAP, it is not a good idea to have a topic on which we are struggling to
>>> find even two speakers that we consider suitable.
>>> ?
>>> Under these circumstances, I propose switching to a topic on which there
>>> are several suitable speakers including more than one from North America.?
>>> ?How about some aspect of visualization? ?If you agree to this topic, I will
>>> approach potential speakers.
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On Sat, 30/7/11, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Subject: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate: topic and speakers
>>>
>>> To: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Saturday, 30 July, 2011, 20:20
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>> Following on from my previous email on this topic, to me the priority is
>>> to settle on topic and speakers.?
>>> ?
>>> In her useful notes, Cassidy wrote ?The topic that received the most
>>> discussion was expanding on Eric Archambault?s criticisms of Jonathan Adam?s
>>> Book Citation Index presentation ? We discussed approaching Eric Archambault
>>> to do the con, but could not think of anyone to do the pro.?? How about
>>> Jonathan providing the pro; after all Jonathan is the person who gave the
>>> Book Citation Index presentation?? Could you please give feedback soon, so
>>> that I can take things forward by either approach Eric and Jonathan or
>>> pursuing a different topic?
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>> --- On Tue, 26/7/11, Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jonathan Levitt <jonathan at levitt.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate
>>> To: "SIG/MET" <sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, 26 July, 2011, 9:40
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>> Thanks for your very helpful feedback.? On the basis of the feedback I
>>> suggest the following revised proposal:
>>> Time of day: 2 p.m. EST.
>>> Date of week: Friday.
>>> Month: September, but not September 24 (overlaps with Collnet).
>>> Speakers: Preferably one from Europe and ne from North America.
>>> Cost: About $15 for students, members of ASIST, members or ISSI; $49 for
>>> others.
>>> Moderator: Dietma has agreed to moderate; thanks very much.
>>> ?
>>> Judit asked whether the people I mentioned have agreed to participate; no,
>>> I have not approached anyone about the possibility of speaking so we are
>>> free to select speakers.
>>> ?
>>> Stasa asked about the format; this is still to be decided.? I would be
>>> pleased to build on Cassidy?s experiences with SIG/ED: ?For example, what
>>> format was used and what changes she would recommend.? Also, it could be
>>> useful to know how many paid $49.
>>> ?
>>> Cassidy thanks for providing your notes from the ISSI meeting.? They are
>>> very helpful and I fully understand about the delay.? You wrote ?We decided
>>> to wait and ask other SIG/MET officers for their opinions?; I welcome
>>> suggestions from the officers not only on the topic, but on other matters
>>> such as the format.
>>> ?
>>> Best,
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 22/7/11, Dietmar Wolfram <dwolfram at uwm.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Dietmar Wolfram <dwolfram at uwm.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate
>>> To: "Cassidy Sugimoto" <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> Date: Friday, 22 July, 2011, 21:17
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Cassidy. That's less than I thought it would be.
>>> Dietmar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Cassidy Sugimoto" <cassidysugimoto at gmail.com>
>>> To: "Dietmar Wolfram" <dwolfram at uwm.edu>
>>> Cc: "Stasa Milojevic" <smilojev at indiana.edu>,
>>> sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:08:12 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate
>>>
>>> The current pricing for webinars is as follows:
>>>
>>> The initial flat price for having ASIS&T set up the webinar, put it on the
>>> website and run registration will be $50 (paid by the SIG, Chapter, etc.).?
>>>
>>> If there is a charge associated with the webinar, ASIS&T HQ will collected
>>> $1.75 per person (even if one group of people is free). Any extra revenue
>>> will go directly to the sponsoring unit (SIG, Chapter, etc.).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Dietmar Wolfram <dwolfram at uwm.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> ?
>>> I like the idea of holding the webinar on a Friday as well for the reasons
>>> cited. I'll be happy to serve as a moderator for the session if we find we
>>> need one.
>>> ?
>>> What is the procedure for?mounting a webinar? I notice that go2meeting has
>>> been used for others. Is there a cost for the sponsoring SIG? As a first
>>> event, I think it would be great if we could offer it for free to SIG
>>> members and students to get more buy-in to the SIG. Of course, this?would
>>> not be feasible if there is a?usage charge for the platform used that would
>>> need to be recouped.
>>> ?
>>> Dietmar
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Stasa Milojevic" <smilojev at indiana.edu>
>>> To: sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 8:24:54 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Sigmet-officers] Webmar debate
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Jonathan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for moving this forward. I have a few suggestions and questions.
>>>
>>> I think that having a webinar during a working week might bring in bigger
>>> audience. One possibility would be a Friday, since there are fewer classes
>>> on Fridays (in the US), which would mean that more faculty and students
>>> might be able to attend.
>>>
>>> What format do we envision? Are these two lecture-type presentations? What
>>> would the role of a moderator be in that case? Who is our targeted audience
>>> (bibliometrics community or general IS community)?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stasa
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/22/11 8:05 AM, Jonathan Levitt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am a bit hampered by not having Cassidy?s notes on the SIG/MET meeting,
>>> but cannot delay pressing on with SIG meters (I am going on my annual
>>> holiday in August). ?I recall two suggestions from our discussions on the
>>> Webmar debate:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (1)????? The strengths and weaknesses of using citation data in the
>>> humanities.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (2)????? The strengths and weaknesses of using citation data.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I prefer the second proposal for two reasons: (a) we were unable to find a
>>> person who we thought would defend using citation data in the humanities and
>>> (b) the second topic is more closely related to our accepted panel on the
>>> use of informetric information and could attract participants at our panel.?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My suggestions are:
>>> Topic: The strengths and weaknesses of using citation data.
>>> Time of day: Afternoon (EST) so at to be a comfortable time of day for
>>> members from California and Europe.
>>> Date of week: Saturday or Sunday.
>>> Month: September.
>>> Speakers: One from Holland (Loet or Henk) and one from Belgium (Ronald or
>>> Wolfgang).
>>> Moderator: A particularly experienced SIG/MET officer (Dietmar? or Judit).
>>> Cost: $14.99 for members of ASIST or ISSI; $49.99 for other people.
>>> ?
>>> Could you please let me know what you think?
>>> ?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
>>> Assistant Professor
>>> School of Library and Information Science
>>> Indiana University Bloomington
>>> http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
>>> Assistant Professor
>>> School of Library and Information Science
>>> Indiana University Bloomington
>>> http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
>>> Assistant Professor
>>> School of Library and Information Science
>>> Indiana University Bloomington
>>> http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110814/bd9be9ec/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>>
>>>
>>> End of Sigmet-officers Digest, Vol 10, Issue 10
>>> ***********************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Judit Bar-Ilan
>> Head of Department
>> Department of Information Science
>> Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel
>> Tel: 972-3-5318351 Fax: 972-3-7384027
>> email: Judit.Bar-Ilan at biu.ac.il
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sigmet-officers mailing list
>> Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
>> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> School of Library and Information Science
> Indiana University Bloomington
> http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto
>

-- 
Cassidy R. Sugimoto, PhD
Assistant Professor
School of Library and Information Science
Indiana University Bloomington
http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~sugimoto

_______________________________________________
Sigmet-officers mailing list
Sigmet-officers at mail.asis.org
http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigmet-officers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigmet-officers/attachments/20110820/6aa0c6d1/attachment.html 