[Sigia-l] New Book: Thoughts on Interaction Design

[Richard Hill]

I never said "can ONLY be done" in fact I acknowledged that other design
disciplines DO affect behavior, what I said is that they don't FOCUS on
behavior.

Are you suggesting that there isn't anything worthy of note called
"intearction design" Just want to understand where you stand in all this? I
mean if you do acknowledge there is interaction design as a discipline of
design then isn't there something that separates it from other disciplines?
I know everything leads to a holistic "DESIGN", but don't sub-disciplines of
understanding such as graphics, IA, even architecture and IxD lead toward
that whole? 

Just want to know if there is even enough agreement in understanding design
to bother with a conversation.

-- dave

On 4/2/07, Listera <listera at earthlink.net> wrote:
> To say that graphic design "focuses" on behavior to me is too simplistics
of 
> an understanding of what it means to design for behavior.

As it is to argue that affecting behavior can only be done through something
called 'interaction design.'

----
Ziya

Usability >  Simplify the Solution 
Design >  Simplify the Problem



------------
IA Summit 2007:  Enriching IA
Rich Information, Rich Interaction, Rich Relationships
March 22-26, 2007, Las Vegas, NV
www.iasummit.org
-----
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/ 




________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l



-- 
David Malouf
http://synapticburn.com/
http://ixda.org/ 
http://motorola.com/