[Sigia-l] Re: Putting the "Graphic" back with "Designer"(was:the lesser importance of home pages)

Malahat Hosseini mhosseini at sfu.ca
Mon Jan 2 21:05:47 EST 2006


Then shouldn't we rather be saying that interface design is
interaction design + visual design( graphic design) ?

I feel interface design embodies graphic design instead of paralleling it.

Malahat



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <andrew at friendlymanual.com>
To: "SIGIA-L" <sigia-l at asis.org>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Sigia-l] Re: Putting the "Graphic" back with 
"Designer"(was:the lesser importance of home pages)


> Quoting Listera <listera at rcn.com>:
>
>> Really?
>> Where does "graphic" design stop and "interface" design begin?
>
> For me, this would be at the interaction design level, if we are talking 
> about
> the traditional boundary between a graphic designer and an interface 
> designer.
> There are people that are perfectly capable of both, but they are 
> different
> hats. I've worked on projects where I was expected to do both, and on 
> others
> there was a dedicated graphic design resource to handle the "making it 
> look
> like a real one" stuff.
>
> Cheers, Andrew
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
> ------------
> When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
> *Plain text, please; NO Attachments
>
> Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
>
> IA 06 Summit.  Mark your calendar.  March 23-27, Vancouver, BC
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
> Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
>
> 





More information about the Sigia-l mailing list