[Sigia-l] Your take on MySpace

Muntone, Jim Jim.Muntone at factiva.com
Wed Aug 9 13:50:14 EDT 2006



Also, (and as a one-time employee of taponline, one of the first
"college community" sites waay back even before Geocities- literally it
was us and yahoo for a while... I can speak to this first hand) what
killed a lot of communities was the fact that in order to be able to
retain advertisers, lots of sites censored or put all sort of
restrictions on content. 

Basically Hyundai doesn't want to see it's ad banner on a page where 200
14 year olds are talking about drugs and sex and nasty grown-up stuff...
Once you start censoring, there's goes the community. You're just "the
man" making money off the backs of the bruised.

Though myspace has somehow managed to retain ads and sponsors but
allowed (with a few exceptions) folks to say whatever is on their minds.


-----Original Message-----
From: sigia-l-bounces at asis.org [mailto:sigia-l-bounces at asis.org] On
Behalf Of John Benjamin
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Lee Hsieh
Cc: sigia-l at asis.org
Subject: Re: [Sigia-l] Your take on MySpace

I've been thinking about this a lot, mostly because other people I
know have wondered the same thing. "MySpace sucks! Why is it so
popular?"

One facet that gets missed in this debate is why *MySpace*. Why is
*it* so popular, when other sites have basically been doing the same
thing for the last ten years?

Here's what I think are some primary reasons for MySpace's success:

"Liberty Via Constraint"
MySpace allows for a lot of personalization with a pretty short,
shallow learning curve. The profile modifications people achieve via
CSS take some knowledge to create but not to implement. Implementation
is as simple as copying the code you're told to copy and pasting it
where you're told to paste it. Previous sites failed in this regard,
from Geocities (not enough constraint) to Friendster (too much).

Geocities was too hard to personalize (either you had to use their
early-Internet-style site-builder, which sucked, or you had to know
HTML). Friendster was too constrained-- people really really really
like to make their profile unique, or semi-unique, even if it means
it's unreadable. They like to add stupid, goofy crap that they think
is funny or moving, from background images to embedded video to
glitter teddy bear pictures. :-/ It lets them make their "profile"
reflect their personality. It lets them imbue their comments and
messages with their personality.

All this time, MySpace is telling them what they can do, or
facilitating someone else to tell them what to do. You can do a lot
with it from the get-go, but the REALLY cool stuff is just a step
away-- but you have to figure it out or ask someone who already knows.
MySpace applies just enough constraint to make the user feel liberated
rather than oppressed. (see "The Paradox of Choice" by Barry Schwartz:
http://tinyurl.com/hj6wj) At the same time, they've left enough hidden
possibility in the site to intrigue the user. From how to repost a
bulletin to how to customize your profile to how to embed a YouTube
video.

"Chain of Cool"
As I understand it, the site was founded by popular party people, and
they used their status (as PPPs) to get other aspiring party people to
join the club. "All the cool kids are doing it." Still works that way
today; many of those who join do so because everyone else has. The
functionality encourages this by encouraging users to play in the
MySpace sandbox.  Each feature of the site is contained within the
site, and doesn't lead the user away. It's like a Web terrarium.

"Focus and Inspiration"
You don't have to sit in your chair, staring at your MySpace profile
wondering "what do I do now?". It tells you-- general interests,
music, movies, schools, companies, who you'd like to meet, etc. It
takes the chore of figuring out what there is to put on a Web page and
transfigures it into the fun exercise of picking and choosing what
you'd like to include. Blogs (which are also part of MySpace) do the
same for the everyday "home page"-- they show you what to do with all
that creative freedom. There's like a hundred million blogs now.

"Perceived Indispensibility"
One of the strategies some business models use to keep customers is to
make it difficult to leave. Banks and ISPs come to mind. MySpace does
the same thing by making you feel left out if you're not using the
site. You don't see the funny video posted to the Bulletins. You don't
know when the SnuffleUmps are playing down at the club. You don't get
invited to the party on MySpace's event system. You don't know what
Tiffany said in Brad's comments that got Angela so upset. You're just
not part of the party, man.

"Voyeurism"
MySpace is enormous. There's a lot there to look at and see. The
voyeuristic effect is powerful, and there are parts of MySpace
profiles that you can't see unless you sign up. This is incentive
first to go look and see what the fuss is about, then to sign up, then
to get hooked on searching for freaks to stare at/hook up with later
this evening.

J

P.S. This is me: http://myspace.com/a1phab3t
P.P.S. I'm 34

On 8/8/06, Lee Hsieh <lhsieh at simple-clarity.com> wrote:
>
> It mitigates teenage angst in the form of public self-expression and
> recognition.  Design per say, for many of the users, does matter but
takes
> place in the form of personal interests displayed(eg, fashin, music,
> friends, etc).
>
> In terms of critical mass, it was achieved through 'low barrier to
entry.'
> It may not be the best user experience to UX folk but is good enough
for
> many who regard it as a 'sandbox' of sorts where it doesn't feel
overly
> groomed and ok to 'get dirty' so to speak...
>
>
> -------------------------------
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:52:50 -0500
> From: Listera <listera at rcn.com>
> Subject: [Sigia-l] Your take on MySpace
> To: SIGIA-L <sigia-l at asis.org>
>
> OK, why does it have 50 million users?
>
> What would one have to smoke to grok it? Does it have any
architectural,
> functional or UX competitive advantages? Is it a fad? Anomaly? Can one
be
> over 23 and still get it? Do you?
>
> ----
> Ziya
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/

Most presentations/papers and posters have been loaded to the IA Summit
06 website:

http://iasummit.org/2006/conferencedescrip.htm
http://iasummit.org/2006/posters.htm



________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l




More information about the Sigia-l mailing list