[Sigia-l] validating an achitecture?
Donna Maurer
donna at maadmob.net
Sat Apr 1 04:35:41 EST 2006
I'm hoping to do something like this soonish as I feel that closed card sorts (the way
they are commonly performed to validate an IA) are an invalid methodology (I think
that information seeking and categorisation are very different from a cognitive
perspective), but I have never heard of anyone checking.
You could also look at this which has some results from a bunch of techniques:
http://iasummit.org/2006/files/43_Presentation_Desc.ppt
Otherwise, I don't think there is any solidly assessed technique.
Donna
On 1 Apr 2006 at 15:43, Eric Scheid wrote:
> I'd like to see the results of a Card Based Classification Evaluation [2]
> compared against the results of a Closed Card Sort, and both interpreted in
> light of the results of a Category Agreement Analysis [3]. Are there
> existing heuristics for validating site architecture? Apart from the
> abominable three click rule [4] of course! What other methods would you
> suggest?
>
> e.
--
Donna Maurer
Maadmob Interaction Design
e: donna at maadmob.net
work: http://maadmob.com.au/
blog: http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/
AOL IM: maadmob
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list