[Sigia-l] Structured Blogging

[James Melzer]

Why does semantic blogging require they have two versions of
everything? Wouldn't it be simpler and more elegant to put the
semantics right in the XHTML with IDs and classes?

~ James

--
James Melzer
http://www.jamesmelzer.com
http://del.icio.us/jamesmelzer


On 12/14/05, Listera <listera at rcn.com> wrote:
> OK, so you have an irrational fear of everything that's Google or you won't
> use anything that's not open source or you're an employee of Yahoo/MSN or
> you just plain don't like GoogleBase. Yet you'd still love to chaste after
> that semantic web chimera. Fear no more :-)
>
> <http://structuredblogging.org>
>
> Sample
> <http://structuredblogging.org/blog/>
>
> Carried to its *logical* conclusion, the implications of this for structured
> info/data is phenomenal. Of course, the web is anything but logical :-) so,
> even during the week of del.icio.us acquisition, there's no certainty about
> its success or the efficacy of microformats, in much the same way
> distributed tagging is burdened with a lot of imponderables.
>
> ----
> Ziya
>
> Sometimes one pays most for the things one gets for nothing.
>
>
> ------------
> When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
> *Plain text, please; NO Attachments
>
> Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
>
> IA 06 Summit.  Mark your calendar.  March 23-27, Vancouver, BC
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
> Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
>