[Sigia-l] Google Scholar vs Citeseer and others

[Anne Miller]

A value add to Google scholar would be bibliographic functionality like that
used in Endnote or Reference Manage. In these apps you can sort relevant
references and save them into a library.

A



Dr Anne Miller
Program Coordinator, Human Factors Online
www.uq.edu.au/human-factors-online
Key Centre for Human Factors & Applied Cognitive Psychology
Ph: 61 7 3365 4543
Email (preferred): amiller at humanfactors.uq.edu.au


-----Original Message-----
From: sigia-l-bounces at asis.org [mailto:sigia-l-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf
Of Tanya Rabourn
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2004 7:21 AM
To: sigia-l at asis.org
Subject: Re: [Sigia-l] Google Scholar vs Citeseer and others


On Nov 21, 2004, at 3:38 PM, petralyn wrote:

>  Why would anyone use anything else?  And that is not rhetorical.

If the resources you wanted to search were not indexed by google 
scholar.

-Tanya

------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable list archive:   http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l