[Sigia-l] User Experience Honeycomb

[richard_dalton at vanguard.com]

I interpreted it exactly the same way (until I read the supporting text).

        Richard






"Matthew deStwolinski" <matthew at destwo.net>
Sent by: sigia-l-admin at asis.org
06/22/2004 09:17 PM

 
        To:     <sigia-l at asis.org>
        cc:     (bcc: Richard Dalton/IT/VGI)
        Subject:        RE: [Sigia-l] User Experience Honeycomb





Peter,

Thank you for the article and for the fun and useful links.  I
appreciate the framework you've provided for thinking of UX.  I thought
I'd share my first impression of the honeycomb diagram, FWIW.

When I first looked at the diagram, I read one of your facets
differently than you later explained.  I read the outside facets as you
seemingly intended...in relation to the user.  A UX can be useful to,
usable by, desirable for, findable for, accessible by, or credible to a
user.  (Granted, some of those prepositions work better than others.)

But I read the center hexagon differently.  You talk of value to the
sponsor.  I saw it as overall value to the user--that is derived from
the outer facets.  The more a UX provides the outer facets, the greater
the value delivered to the user.

Matthew

------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable list archive:   http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l