[Sigia-l] Usability testing into the dustbin?

[Todd R.Warfel]

Somewhat true. If, however, it's a disease or a serious condition, the 
doctor will run tests every time.

So, some items might not need to be tested, if they're designed based 
upon founded principles. However, more complex items may need to be 
tested every time.

On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 10:40 AM, Lord, Ralph wrote:

> Analogy: After a doctor has been practicing for a while, she doesn't 
> need to
> run a battery of tests to confirm a diagnosis when she sees symptoms 
> that to
> her are "obviously/clearly/unequivocally" caused by disease X.  She
> diagnoses, prescribes treatment and moves on.  IF the condition doesn't
> improve, perhaps tests are needed.
>
> Application: If you've been testing and focusing on usability for a 
> while,
> you should have some knowledge about making software usable that can be
> brought to bear during the DESIGN of an application. Take advantage of 
> that
> knowledge.

Cheers!

Todd R. Warfel

_//message first [method second]
-=========================-
User Experience Architect
Cornell University Lab of Ornithology
[P] (607) 254-2477
[F] (607) 254-2415
[E] todd.warfel at cornell.edu
-=========================-

In theory, theory and practice are the same,
but in practice, they're not.