[Sigia-l] Word HTML - money were my mouth is (was WhenShoulda Manual be Web-based?)

[Thomas Vander Wal]

On 3/4/03 8:55 PM, "Boniface Lau" <boniface_lau at compuserve.com> wrote:

>> From: sigia-l-admin at asis.org [mailto:sigia-l-admin at asis.org]On
>> Behalf Of Thomas Vander Wal
>>  
>> Boniface Lau wrote:
>> 
>>>> From: sigia-l-admin at asis.org [mailto:sigia-l-admin at asis.org]On
>>>> Behalf Of Thomas Vander Wal
>>>> 
>>>>> The issue was NOT on whether Word produced a "good" web page or
>>>>> (X)HTML.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The issue was whether Word produced a web page without HTML
>>>>> error.
>>>>> 
>>>> I should have expected the classic Boniface response, which is to
>>>> cut out the section of the e-mail with the answer to your question
>>>> then act like the question was not answered.
>>> 
>>> Care to cite facts and logic to back up your above accusation? Or
>>> are you used to making unsubstantiated accusations?
>>> 
>> Look at most of your response on the board, I do not say this in a
>> crewl manner, but I find it humorous.  It is a different approach.
> 
> Your above response does not change the fact that you were making an
> unsubstantiated accusation.

If you do not consider the one standard for good HTML, then what, pray tell,
do you consider good HTML if it is not valid HTML?  What do you consider
good markup practices?  Pure and utter garbage will and can be displayed in
a browser.

All the best,
Thomas