[Sigia-l] "Study: Content Management Tools Fail"

David Heller hippiefunk at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 27 18:59:51 EST 2003


Why does open source help? Plone is actually the opposite problem in
that it is too simple. No Zope on the other hand is a great solution b/c
it is a platform solution as is Documentum on the non-open side. It
takes more to implement these, but you can custom tailor your solution
to be whatever you need. They just provide the building blocks.
Solutions like red dot, ePrise, etc. don't have that type of flexibility
and customizations. 

It all depends on if you as an IT person want to get your hands dirty in
order to make the right experience for your users. It is impossible for
a vendor to know YOUR requirements. All they can do is give you the best
platform on which to build that solution on. Of course having some type
of out-of-the-box solution is very helpful as both Zope and Documentum
(and everyone else) has as well. But these are barely suitable for
anyone.

-- dave

David Heller
Sr. User Interface Designer
Documentum: The Leader in Enterprise Content Management
925.600.5636
 
david.heller at documentum.com
http://www.documentum.com/
AIM: bolinhanyc  //  Yahoo: dave_ux  //  MSN: hippiefunk at hotmail.com
 
--"If it isn't useful, it will never be usable."


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Neeman [mailto:pat at nexisinteractive.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:55 PM
To: Listera; sigia-l
Subject: RE: [Sigia-l] "Study: Content Management Tools Fail"


One of the reasons why open source tools like plone are being looked at.

P@

Patrick Neeman
pat at nexisinteractive.com <mailto:pat at nexisinteractive.com> 
949 643-0910 land
949 633-3054 cell
949 215-1659 fax

nexis interactive
our skills. your solutions.

------------------------------------------
Signs Evil Forces Are Out To Get You:
Roommate's note on fridge:
"Evil Forces called. Will try back later."



> -----Original Message-----
> From: sigia-l-admin at asis.org [mailto:sigia-l-admin at asis.org]On Behalf 
> Of Listera
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: sigia-l
> Subject: [Sigia-l] "Study: Content Management Tools Fail"
> 
> 
> "Today, more than 60 percent of companies that have deployed Web 
> content management solutions still find themselves manually updating 
> their sites."
> 
> "Overcomplicated, end-to-end packages can as much as quintuple site 
> operational costs over human labor alternatives. Unfortunately, the 
> breadth of many vendors' all too-inclusive 'silver-bullet solution' 
> vision has left these companies struggling with platform lock-in, 
> overengineered site infrastructures, exorbitant technical maintenance 
> costs, and per-business-user costs averaging as much as $25,000 per 
> year."

... 
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible. *Plain text,
please; NO Attachments

ASIST IA 03 Summit: Making Connections
http://www.asist-events.org/IASummit2003/

Searchable list archive:   http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l at asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l



More information about the Sigia-l mailing list