[Sigia-l] GoogleNews
Teresa Torres
ttorres at highwire.stanford.edu
Wed Sep 25 01:18:21 EDT 2002
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:51:23PM -0400, Michael Kay wrote:
>I think google news is mainly a novel idea, but a damn good one. It's
>probably better as a wire service for journalists than for mainstream
>consumption. News needs an editorial voice. No algorithm could
>consistently pick the 3 most relevant stories to lead with. (Even
>human editors have trouble figuring this out.)
I think this is precisely the brilliance of the google news idea. Picking lead stories is subjective. Real people have a hard time doing it. So why not take a census of what a collection of real people subjectively decided and treat them like votes. I think this is exactly where smart algorithms can help with problems that are difficult for us humans. Granted, this still relies upon real humans to poll - the thousands of editors who pick the lead stories on the 4,000 sites Google uses.
Google, didn't remove the editor from the process, instead they came up with a way to collate a set of subjective choices in an attempt to find commanlity - perhaps remove some of the subjectivity. I think it's a fantastic experiment.
Teresa
More information about the Sigia-l
mailing list