[Sigcabinet] SIG Member and SIG Publication awards

[Nadia Caidi]

Either option works for me.


Cheers,
Nadia

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Phillip M Edwards
<pmedward at email.unc.edu>wrote:

>
> I'm for option #1 as well. I agree that each nominee seems deserving of
> their respective awards. -Phil
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:18:12 -0400 (GMT-04:00), swarwick at sprynet.comwrote:
> > I'm for number one as well.  Whenever I see an announcement of any
> extended
> > time period for a CFP or nominations that the original pool was
> > insufficient and wonder if I would want to participate in something that
> > can't attract sufficient interest or submissions of quality.  Not to
> > mention that I like fast and easy.
> >
> > Shelly
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >>From: KT Vaughan <ktlv at email.unc.edu>
> >>Sent: Aug 17, 2010 10:56 AM
> >>To: Sigcabinet at mail.asis.org
> >>Subject: [Sigcabinet] SIG Member and SIG Publication awards
> >>
> >>Hi SIG Cab Steering Cte!
> >>
> >>Deadlines for the SIG awards were yesterday.  I'm pleased to report that
> >>we got five SIG annual reports/ SIG of the Year nominations, and several
> >>of them look really strong.  There's a separate jury for that, so you
> >>don't have to worry about evaluating them.
> >>
> >>The Steering committee is supposed to jury the Member and Publication
> >>awards.  This year we have only one nomination for each of those.  SIG
> >>USE nominated their 10th anniversary retrospective issue for the
> >>Publication; I nominated Barrie Hayes (SIG DL Chair) for Member.
> >>Obviously I will have to recuse myself from discussions of the member
> >>award.  I will be sending you email from the Softconf system so you can
> >>log in and view the two packets.
> >>
> >>We have two options at this time:
> >>1: Take the nominations that we have, ensure that they are deserving of
> >>the awards (imho, yes, but I'm clearly biased on one), and move on with
> >>our lives.
> >>2: Extend the nominations period another two weeks, and deal with it
> >>after Labor Day.
> >>
> >>My inclination is for #1, if only because it gets this particular job
> >>done with so we can proceed with other things.  Discussion?
> >>KT
> _______________________________________________
> Sigcabinet mailing list
> Sigcabinet at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigcabinet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/sigcabinet/attachments/20100819/7e206311/attachment.html