From rhmcdona at indiana.edu Mon Dec 4 11:37:59 2017 From: rhmcdona at indiana.edu (McDonald, Robert H.) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:37:59 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL2018) CFP In-Reply-To: <2FA0CFED-22FB-43A1-A178-7BDDEEA23049@ucsd.edu> References: <2FA0CFED-22FB-43A1-A178-7BDDEEA23049@ucsd.edu> Message-ID: <1512405636842.39274@indiana.edu> Apologies for cross-postings... The ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2018 (JCDL 2018L: https://2018.jcdl.org/) will be held in conjunction with UNT Open Access Symposium 2018 (https://openaccess.unt.edu/symposium/2018) on June 3 - 6, 2018 in Fort Worth, Texas, the rustic and artistic threshold into the American West. JCDL welcomes interesting submissions ranging across theories, systems, services, and applications. We invite those managing, operating, developing, curating, evaluating, or utilizing digital libraries broadly defined, covering academic or public institutions, including archives, museums, and social networks. We seek involvement of those in iSchools, as well as working in computer or information or social sciences and technologies. Multiple tracks and sessions will ensure tailoring to researchers, practitioners, and diverse communities including data science/analytics, data curation/stewardship, information retrieval, human-computer interaction, hypertext (and Web/network scie! nce), multimedia, publishing, preservation, digital humanities, machine learning/AI, heritage/culture, health/medicine, policy, law, and privacy/intellectual property. General Instructions on submissions of full papers, short papers, posters and demonstrations, doctoral consortium, tutorials, workshops, and panels can be found at https://2018.jcdl.org/general_instructions. Below are the submission deadlines: * Jan. 15, 2018 - Tutorial and workshop proposal submissions * Jan. 15, 2018 - Full paper and short paper submissions * Jan. 29, 2018 - Panel, poster and demonstration submissions * Feb. 1, 2018 - Notification of acceptance for tutorials and workshops * Mar. 8, 2018 - Notification of acceptance for full papers, short papers, panels, posters, and demonstrations * Mar. 25, 2018 - Doctoral Consortium abstract submissions * Apr. 5, 2018 - Notification of acceptance for Doctoral Consortium * Apr. 15, 2018 - Final camera-ready deadline for full papers, short papers, panels, posters, and demonstrations Please email jcdl2018 at googlegroups.com if you have any questions.? ********************************** Robert H. McDonald Associate Dean for Research & Technology Strategies Deputy Director-Data to Insight Center, Pervasive Technology Institute General Co-Chair HathiTrust Research Center UnCamp 2018 Panels Co-Chair JCDL 2018 Indiana University 1320 East 10th Street Herman B Wells Library 234 Bloomington, IN 47405 Phone: 812-856-4834 Email: rhmcdona at indiana.edu Skype: rhmcdonald ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4258-0982 ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richard.brown at berkeley.edu Mon Dec 4 17:36:17 2017 From: richard.brown at berkeley.edu (Richard Brown) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:36:17 -0800 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] =?utf-8?q?Job_Posting=3A_Digital_Lifecycle_Progra?= =?utf-8?q?m=2C_Program_Manager_=E2=80=93_Library?= Message-ID: Hello, Please share the posting below to any who may be interested. Thank you, Ricky Brown -- *?Digital Lifecycle Program, Program Manager ? Library* *POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT* *University of California, Berkeley* *Digital Lifecycle Program, Program Manager ? Library* *Hiring range: Associate Librarian to Librarian* *Salary: $ 73,357-$ 98,486, per annum, based upon qualifications* *This is a full-time appointment with a February 2018 expected start date.* UC Berkeley is looking for a service-oriented Digital Lifecycle Program (DLP) Program Manager whose principal role will be to ensure the effective design and coordination of the DLP. S/he will be a strong technical leader with a vision for the transformative impact of digital content for libraries and scholarship. The DLP Program Manager will work closely with and lead a multi-departmental team to ensure the success of the DLP including the direct supervision of approximately 3 FTE with an overall department of approximately 8 FTE. The program manager is primarily responsible for managing all aspects of the DLP including preparation, conversion, preservation and publication of collections that flow through the DLP. These collections will include a mix of general and archival collections, a mix of formats (e.g. print, micro-formats, media and born-digital content) and content types (e.g. pictorial, manuscript, a/v collections). This work is accomplished with a team of staff directly reporting to the program manager as well as staff across the library who will work with the program in indirect reporting relationships. The ideal candidate has expertise and passion for managing multi-threaded organization-wide projects, has considerable technical expertise in the area of digitization, digital preservation and digital content publication and has significant leadership and interpersonal skills, and communication skills required for the management of a large program. Primarily responsible for leading the DLP, this position has direct supervision of an in-house digital conversion team, an in house digital preservation team, and program leads for various vendor-completed projects. This position co-reports to the Associate University Librarian for Digital Initiatives and Collaborative Services and the Head of Library IT. *The Environment* The UC Berkeley Library is an internationally renowned research and teaching facility at one of the nation's premier public universities. In a highly diverse and intellectually rich environment, Berkeley serves a campus community of 30,600 undergraduate students, 11,300 graduate students, and a faculty of 1,520. The Library comprises 20 campus libraries - including the Doe/Moffitt Libraries, the Bancroft Library, the C. V. Starr East Asian Library and subject specialty libraries. With a collection of more than 11 million volumes and a collection budget of over $15 million, the Library offers extensive collections in all formats and robust services to connect users with those collections and build their related research skills. The DLP is a major strategic initiative of the University Library, launching in FY2018 and building on significant historic efforts around digital conversion. The initiative is planned for an initial five year term subject to continuation based on successful project outcomes and available funding. The UC Berkeley Library holds over 11 million volumes and tens of millions of archival and rare objects that are the primary focus of this digital conversion program. *Responsibilities* - Responsible for comprehensive management of the DLP including digital content conversion, preservation and publication, content identification and prioritization, communication and outreach related to the DLP - Provide coordination and leadership in planning and implementation of system and services to support the digital lifecycle (e.g. creation/acquisition, management/preservation, discovery/access) - Supervise imaging, digital asset management and digital preservation personnel directly and manages in a matrix approach related project personnel - Ensure high-throughput steady-state operations for digital conversion work streams - Lead the development of standards, policies and procedures for the DLP - Create project plans to ensure timely and successful completion of digital lifecycle projects. Accountable for delivery of assigned projects through all project phases: initiation, execution, delivery, conclusion and assessment - Maintain close collaborative relationships across the library including with key stakeholders such as Scholarly Communication, Preservation and regular and special collections - Maintain close and/or matrixed working relationships with collections, technology and metadata staff to ensure the DLP?s success - Initiate and assist in grant preparation, execution and reporting - Engage in scholarship and service including talks, papers and other activities on project outcomes to internal and external stakeholders - Represent UCB in national initiatives and programs related to the digital library and digital lifecycle program *Minimum Basic Qualification at Time of Application:* Masters degree from an American Library Association (ALA) accredited institution or equivalent degree in which coursework has focused on program management or in which digitization are important to scholarship. *Additional Required Qualifications by Start Date in Position:* - A minimum of two years experience leading an academic or research program of campus-wide or organization-wide scope, emphasizing the role of digital conversion, preservation and/or publication - Demonstrated experience managing individuals and groups in direct reporting and matrix reporting relationships - Demonstrated evidence of leadership skills, initiative, flexibility and the ability to adapt to a complex, rapidly changing academic environment - Demonstrated knowledge of technical, legal, and information policy issues related to digital conversion and publication - Demonstrated ability to present complex information to audiences who possess different levels of library knowledge - Demonstrated ability to work effectively with diverse staff and campus user communities - Demonstrated proficiency in persuasive written and oral communication skills - Demonstrated project planning experience and ability to advance multiple complex projects in a team environment - Demonstrated ability to function independently, take initiative, and set goals and priorities in a dynamic environment *Additional Preferred Qualifications* - Demonstrated experience in an academic research library - Experience working in different project management settings and with different project management methodologies - Significant technical experience relevant to digital conversion, digital preservation and/or publication - Demonstrated supervisory experience including developing personal growth opportunities and fostering and building capacity in others, including teams - Demonstrated experience with and knowledge of managing data long term The Library at the University of California, Berkeley is committed to the support and encouragement of a multicultural environment and seeks candidates who can make positive contributions in a context of ethnic and cultural diversity. UC Berkeley librarians are expected to participate in library-wide planning and governance and work effectively in shared decision-making environment. Advancement in the Librarian series is based in part on professional contributions beyond the primary assignment; the successful candidate will show evidence or promise of such contributions to the Library, campus, UC System and profession. This academic position is covered by the UC Academic Personnel Manual (APM). Librarians are entitled to two days per month of vacation leave, one day per month of sick leave, and all other benefits granted to non-faculty, non-Senate academic personnel. The University has an excellent retirement system and sponsors a variety of group health, dental, vision, and life insurance plans in addition to other benefits. *This recruitment will remain open until filled.* Submit applications online at: https://aprecruit.berkeley.edu/apply/JPF01584 Applications must include a cover letter detailing a statement of qualifications, curriculum vitae noting degrees and relevant work experience, and the names and contact information of three references who are knowledgeable about the applicant?s qualifications for this position. The University of California is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, age or protected veteran status. For the complete University of California nondiscrimination and affirmative action policy see: http://policy.ucop.edu/do c/4000376/NondiscrimAffirmAct. Send inquiries to: Susan E. Wong Director, Library Human Resources Library Human Resources Department 110 Doe Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-3778 Email: librec at library.berkeley.edu? -- *Ricky Brown* *Administrative and Recruitment Assistant* *110 Doe Library* University of California, Berkeley Phone: 510-664-7650 <(510)%20664-7650> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From awoods at duraspace.org Wed Dec 6 12:58:03 2017 From: awoods at duraspace.org (Andrew Woods) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 12:58:03 -0500 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Meeting Outputs: Oxford Common Filesystem Layout 2017-12-01 Message-ID: Hello All, As a follow-up from last week's Oxford Common Filesystem Layout (OCFL) conference call, we enjoyed a great turnout (49 attendees) and six excellent presentations on existing digital preservation approaches from: * Univ of California, San Diego (Tim Marconi) * Stanford (Julian Morley) * California Digital Library (John Kunze) * Notre Dame (Don Brower) * Emory (Rosalyn Metz) * Univ of North Texas (Mark Phillips) In addition to increasing a shared understanding of how others in our community are addressing digital preservation needs, the intention of the OCFL initiative is to establish a community-based recommendation describing the presentation-centric layout for repository resources on the filesystem (or cloud storage). The notes, video and audio-only from last week's meeting are available. * Notes: https://bit.ly/ocfl-2017-12-notes * Video: https://bit.ly/ocfl-2017-12-video * Audio: https://bit.ly/ocfl-2017-12-audio The next call in the on-going OCFL initiative will be on January 19th @11am ET. Stay tuned for further information. Regards, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zvowell at calpoly.edu Thu Dec 7 15:06:48 2017 From: zvowell at calpoly.edu (Zach Vowell) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 20:06:48 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Reminder: Call for Software Preservation Project Proposals // DUE Jan. 12 Message-ID: Consider submitting a Software Preservation project proposal - we want to hear from you! Applications are open until January 12th! New details about an informational session for those interested in applying are below. OVERVIEW The Fostering a Community of Practice: Software Preservation and Emulation Experts in Libraries and Archives (FCoP) [IMLS grant RE-95-17-0058-17] project is Calling for Project Proposals that empower librarians, archivists, and curators to address the key challenges to providing long-term access to software-dependent cultural heritage. Projects undertaken by the six proposals selected will advance digital preservation practice by contributing to our understanding of software preservation in a variety of organizational contexts. The activities and documentation produced by FCoP cohort members will complement parallel efforts to bring software preservation and access into mainstream digital preservation practice (addressing specific legal, metadata and technical preservation and access challenges). APPLICATION TIMELINE >From November 28, 2017 to January 12th, 2018, the FCoP Project Staff for the Fostering Communities of Practice project will be accepting applications for projects during the Summer 2018-Summer 2019 term. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project proposals should be initiated by cultural heritage organizations in the United States that are currently working to preserve and provide access to digital content. The FCoP Project Team is particularly interested in project proposals from Historically Black Colleges & Universities Library Alliance (HBCU) and Association for Specialized and Cooperative Library Agencies (ASCLA) member organizations. However project proposals from all other cultural heritage institutions are welcome. Participation in the FCoP cohort includes: * $5,000 financial award to be used for travel and registration costs for conferences and workshops where cohort members will present, facilitate discussion and actively solicit interest from fellow librarians, archivists, and museum conservators and curators * Community fellowship, sharing and information exchange with members of the FCoP cohort * Access to and technical support for a web-based emulation sandbox which requires no local installation * Formal support for problem-based learning and research on the challenges to implementing software preservation and emulation in their local organization * Access to and support for communication tools for the duration of the project in order to encourage the cohort to communicate with one another outside of structured or facilitated interaction * Support from a caring and deeply invested FCoP Project Staff that want to ensure that these projects are meaningful for participating individuals and organizations * Crucial contribution to broader national and international software preservation efforts and access strategies, including the Software Preservation Network. All project proposals must include: * 2 Letters of Commitment * Statement of Interest * Identification of Project Team * Resumes/CVs from the Applicant Project Team * Project Summary MORE INFORMATION: For more details and application instructions, check out the project website: http://www.softwarepreservationnetwork.org/fcop/ Think you might want to submit a software preservation and access project proposal but have questions? We encourage your participation in the FCoP Software Preservation Open Forum! * WHAT: FCoP Software Preservation Open Forum will include: * (5-10min) Brief overview of the FCoP project * (10 min) Klaus Reichert (University of Frieburg, OpenSLX): Emulation as a Service * (10 min) Tim Walsh (Canadian Centre for Architecture): Software Preservation Workflows * (10 min) Brandon Butler (University of Virginia Libraries): Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Software Preservation * (20-25min) Open question and answer session for attendees * WHEN: FCoP Software Preservation Open Forum will be held: * Tuesday, December 12th, 2017 * 9am PT/11am CT/12pm ET * Sign up for a calendar reminder here: https://goo.gl/4KTkRC * WHERE: FCoP Software Preservation Open Forum will be hosted in Zoom, see call-in instructions below: * Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/946742570 * Or Telephone: US: +1 646 558 8656 or +1 669 900 6833 * Meeting ID: 946 742 570 ------------------------------------------------ Zach Vowell, CA // Digital Archivist Special Collections and Archives Robert E. Kennedy Library California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Phone: 805-756-5710 lib.calpoly.edu/specialcollections/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ntay at stanford.edu Fri Dec 8 11:39:05 2017 From: ntay at stanford.edu (Nicholas Taylor) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:39:05 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals Message-ID: IIPC WEB ARCHIVING CONFERENCE 2018: Call for Proposals WEB ARCHIVING HISTORIES AND FUTURES National Library of New Zealand Wellington 13-15 November 2018 Web archiving is now into its third decade of practice and there is much experience to reflect upon and many achievements to acknowledge. It is also a critical time to look to the future and to the technical, legal, ethical and organisational challenges that saving the web for citizens and for researchers continue to present. As established web archives mature and new initiatives emerge, web archive artefacts and data become more valuable for our understanding of societies, politics, cultures and economies in a world of increasingly contested narratives. In 2018 the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) will celebrate 15 years as the premier international body fostering the development of web archiving tools, standards, practice and research. For the first time in a decade, the IIPC's annual web archiving conference will come to Australasia, providing a rare opportunity for web curators, librarians, archivists, historians, humanists, researchers, developers, computer scientists and others interested in the preservation of world's web heritage to come together at this international forum in the southern hemisphere. Proposals on all aspects of web archiving practice as well as researching and using web archives are invited. Particularly welcome are proposals related to the Australasian, Asia Pacific and southern hemisphere regions; proposals from the perspective of new users and researchers; and proposals addressing the major conference themes of histories and futures. Potential topics include: Building web archives * Harvesting approaches, tools and challenges * Collection development and curation * Legal and ethical issues in collecting content Maintaining web archive content and operations * Preservation and sustainability issues and strategies * Institutional and organizational structures and approaches * Collection assessment and metrics * Collection management tools * Description and access Using and researching web archives * User experience and discovery * Legal, ethical or social aspects in accessing content * Tools, APIs and indexing for researching web archives * Research opportunities and challenges presented by web archives Web archive histories and futures * Initiatives and collaborations * Web archive stories and histories * National web domains * Web archives as repositories of 'truth' The programme committee invite proposals for: * 30 minute presentations (i.e., 20 minutes for presentation plus 10 minutes for questions) * 60 minute panel discussions or multi-presentations * Conference themed workshops (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Tutorials focusing on particular tools (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Posters with accompanying 5 minute lightning talks Proposals for presentations and panels must be submitted as an abstract of between 300 and 500 words. Proposals for workshops and tutorials should be 800 to 1,000 words and include information about coordinators, format, target participant numbers and technical requirements. Proposals should demonstrate how the presentation, panel or workshop contributes to understanding web archiving histories or futures and the general themes relating to building, maintaining and researching web archives. Proposal should be accompanied by 3 to 5 keywords. Based on the abstracts, the programme committee may invite the submission of full papers for future publication. Please submit your proposals using EasyChair http://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=iipc2018 For questions, please e-mail iipc2018 at iipc.simplelists.com The deadline for submissions is 28 February 2018. All submissions will be reviewed by the WAC18 Programme Committee and submitters will be notified by 16 April 2018. For more information and updates, see: http://netpreserve.org/ga2018/ @NetPreserve #iipcWAC18 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.wardrop at strath.ac.uk Tue Dec 12 05:35:45 2017 From: laura.wardrop at strath.ac.uk (Laura Wardrop) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:35:45 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Please remove me from this list. Thanks. Kind regards Laura Wardrop Executive Education Programme Manager Centre for Corporate Connections Strathclyde Business School, Level 2 199 Cathedral Street Glasgow, G4 0QU Tel: 0141 5536020 Only 1% of the world's business schools are triple accredited: Strathclyde is one of them http://www.strath.ac.uk/business/cee/ ??? ?? This message is confidential and intended only for named recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Taylor Sent: 08 December 2017 16:39 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals IIPC WEB ARCHIVING CONFERENCE 2018: Call for Proposals WEB ARCHIVING HISTORIES AND FUTURES National Library of New Zealand Wellington 13-15 November 2018 Web archiving is now into its third decade of practice and there is much experience to reflect upon and many achievements to acknowledge. It is also a critical time to look to the future and to the technical, legal, ethical and organisational challenges that saving the web for citizens and for researchers continue to present. As established web archives mature and new initiatives emerge, web archive artefacts and data become more valuable for our understanding of societies, politics, cultures and economies in a world of increasingly contested narratives. In 2018 the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) will celebrate 15 years as the premier international body fostering the development of web archiving tools, standards, practice and research. For the first time in a decade, the IIPC's annual web archiving conference will come to Australasia, providing a rare opportunity for web curators, librarians, archivists, historians, humanists, researchers, developers, computer scientists and others interested in the preservation of world's web heritage to come together at this international forum in the southern hemisphere. Proposals on all aspects of web archiving practice as well as researching and using web archives are invited. Particularly welcome are proposals related to the Australasian, Asia Pacific and southern hemisphere regions; proposals from the perspective of new users and researchers; and proposals addressing the major conference themes of histories and futures. Potential topics include: Building web archives * Harvesting approaches, tools and challenges * Collection development and curation * Legal and ethical issues in collecting content Maintaining web archive content and operations * Preservation and sustainability issues and strategies * Institutional and organizational structures and approaches * Collection assessment and metrics * Collection management tools * Description and access Using and researching web archives * User experience and discovery * Legal, ethical or social aspects in accessing content * Tools, APIs and indexing for researching web archives * Research opportunities and challenges presented by web archives Web archive histories and futures * Initiatives and collaborations * Web archive stories and histories * National web domains * Web archives as repositories of 'truth' The programme committee invite proposals for: * 30 minute presentations (i.e., 20 minutes for presentation plus 10 minutes for questions) * 60 minute panel discussions or multi-presentations * Conference themed workshops (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Tutorials focusing on particular tools (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Posters with accompanying 5 minute lightning talks Proposals for presentations and panels must be submitted as an abstract of between 300 and 500 words. Proposals for workshops and tutorials should be 800 to 1,000 words and include information about coordinators, format, target participant numbers and technical requirements. Proposals should demonstrate how the presentation, panel or workshop contributes to understanding web archiving histories or futures and the general themes relating to building, maintaining and researching web archives. Proposal should be accompanied by 3 to 5 keywords. Based on the abstracts, the programme committee may invite the submission of full papers for future publication. Please submit your proposals using EasyChair http://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=iipc2018 For questions, please e-mail iipc2018 at iipc.simplelists.com The deadline for submissions is 28 February 2018. All submissions will be reviewed by the WAC18 Programme Committee and submitters will be notified by 16 April 2018. For more information and updates, see: http://netpreserve.org/ga2018/ @NetPreserve #iipcWAC18 From Dominic.Wilson at globecast.com Tue Dec 12 05:39:22 2017 From: Dominic.Wilson at globecast.com (Dominic Wilson) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:39:22 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8C54BAD005900C4B97F1A6193701FAA902A247ADA0@GCMAILG1.globecastne.com> Could you please remove me also Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Laura Wardrop Sent: 12 December 2017 10:36 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals Please remove me from this list. Thanks. Kind regards Laura Wardrop Executive Education Programme Manager Centre for Corporate Connections Strathclyde Business School, Level 2 199 Cathedral Street Glasgow, G4 0QU Tel: 0141 5536020 Only 1% of the world's business schools are triple accredited: Strathclyde is one of them http://www.strath.ac.uk/business/cee/ This message is confidential and intended only for named recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Taylor Sent: 08 December 2017 16:39 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals IIPC WEB ARCHIVING CONFERENCE 2018: Call for Proposals WEB ARCHIVING HISTORIES AND FUTURES National Library of New Zealand Wellington 13-15 November 2018 Web archiving is now into its third decade of practice and there is much experience to reflect upon and many achievements to acknowledge. It is also a critical time to look to the future and to the technical, legal, ethical and organisational challenges that saving the web for citizens and for researchers continue to present. As established web archives mature and new initiatives emerge, web archive artefacts and data become more valuable for our understanding of societies, politics, cultures and economies in a world of increasingly contested narratives. In 2018 the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) will celebrate 15 years as the premier international body fostering the development of web archiving tools, standards, practice and research. For the first time in a decade, the IIPC's annual web archiving conference will come to Australasia, providing a rare opportunity for web curators, librarians, archivists, historians, humanists, researchers, developers, computer scientists and others interested in the preservation of world's web heritage to come together at this international forum in the southern hemisphere. Proposals on all aspects of web archiving practice as well as researching and using web archives are invited. Particularly welcome are proposals related to the Australasian, Asia Pacific and southern hemisphere regions; proposals from the perspective of new users and researchers; and proposals addressing the major conference themes of histories and futures. Potential topics include: Building web archives * Harvesting approaches, tools and challenges * Collection development and curation * Legal and ethical issues in collecting content Maintaining web archive content and operations * Preservation and sustainability issues and strategies * Institutional and organizational structures and approaches * Collection assessment and metrics * Collection management tools * Description and access Using and researching web archives * User experience and discovery * Legal, ethical or social aspects in accessing content * Tools, APIs and indexing for researching web archives * Research opportunities and challenges presented by web archives Web archive histories and futures * Initiatives and collaborations * Web archive stories and histories * National web domains * Web archives as repositories of 'truth' The programme committee invite proposals for: * 30 minute presentations (i.e., 20 minutes for presentation plus 10 minutes for questions) * 60 minute panel discussions or multi-presentations * Conference themed workshops (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Tutorials focusing on particular tools (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Posters with accompanying 5 minute lightning talks Proposals for presentations and panels must be submitted as an abstract of between 300 and 500 words. Proposals for workshops and tutorials should be 800 to 1,000 words and include information about coordinators, format, target participant numbers and technical requirements. Proposals should demonstrate how the presentation, panel or workshop contributes to understanding web archiving histories or futures and the general themes relating to building, maintaining and researching web archives. Proposal should be accompanied by 3 to 5 keywords. Based on the abstracts, the programme committee may invite the submission of full papers for future publication. Please submit your proposals using EasyChair http://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=iipc2018 For questions, please e-mail iipc2018 at iipc.simplelists.com The deadline for submissions is 28 February 2018. All submissions will be reviewed by the WAC18 Programme Committee and submitters will be notified by 16 April 2018. For more information and updates, see: http://netpreserve.org/ga2018/ @NetPreserve #iipcWAC18 ---- To subscribe, unsubscribe, or modify your subscription, please visit http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/pasig-discuss _______ PASIG Webinars and conference material is at http://www.preservationandarchivingsig.org/index.html _______________________________________________ Pasig-discuss mailing list Pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/pasig-discuss Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le d?truire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Globecast decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Globecast is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From j-mambretti at northwestern.edu Tue Dec 12 08:19:10 2017 From: j-mambretti at northwestern.edu (Joe J Mambretti) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:19:10 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals In-Reply-To: <8C54BAD005900C4B97F1A6193701FAA902A247ADA0@GCMAILG1.globecastne.com> References: , <8C54BAD005900C4B97F1A6193701FAA902A247ADA0@GCMAILG1.globecastne.com> Message-ID: <1513084753290.17494@northwestern.edu> Please also remove me from this list Thanks ________________________________________ From: Pasig-discuss on behalf of Dominic Wilson Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:39 AM To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: Re: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals Could you please remove me also Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Laura Wardrop Sent: 12 December 2017 10:36 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] FW: IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals Please remove me from this list. Thanks. Kind regards Laura Wardrop Executive Education Programme Manager Centre for Corporate Connections Strathclyde Business School, Level 2 199 Cathedral Street Glasgow, G4 0QU Tel: 0141 5536020 Only 1% of the world's business schools are triple accredited: Strathclyde is one of them https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.strath.ac.uk_business_cee_&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=dk2L-WvWLYS4-nfE9O5rKhJwAQ9U8YMWB6VuNFB_dtg&e= This message is confidential and intended only for named recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Taylor Sent: 08 December 2017 16:39 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] IIPC Web Archiving Conference 2018: Call for Proposals IIPC WEB ARCHIVING CONFERENCE 2018: Call for Proposals WEB ARCHIVING HISTORIES AND FUTURES National Library of New Zealand Wellington 13-15 November 2018 Web archiving is now into its third decade of practice and there is much experience to reflect upon and many achievements to acknowledge. It is also a critical time to look to the future and to the technical, legal, ethical and organisational challenges that saving the web for citizens and for researchers continue to present. As established web archives mature and new initiatives emerge, web archive artefacts and data become more valuable for our understanding of societies, politics, cultures and economies in a world of increasingly contested narratives. In 2018 the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) will celebrate 15 years as the premier international body fostering the development of web archiving tools, standards, practice and research. For the first time in a decade, the IIPC's annual web archiving conference will come to Australasia, providing a rare opportunity for web curators, librarians, archivists, historians, humanists, researchers, developers, computer scientists and others interested in the preservation of world's web heritage to come together at this international forum in the southern hemisphere. Proposals on all aspects of web archiving practice as well as researching and using web archives are invited. Particularly welcome are proposals related to the Australasian, Asia Pacific and southern hemisphere regions; proposals from the perspective of new users and researchers; and proposals addressing the major conference themes of histories and futures. Potential topics include: Building web archives * Harvesting approaches, tools and challenges * Collection development and curation * Legal and ethical issues in collecting content Maintaining web archive content and operations * Preservation and sustainability issues and strategies * Institutional and organizational structures and approaches * Collection assessment and metrics * Collection management tools * Description and access Using and researching web archives * User experience and discovery * Legal, ethical or social aspects in accessing content * Tools, APIs and indexing for researching web archives * Research opportunities and challenges presented by web archives Web archive histories and futures * Initiatives and collaborations * Web archive stories and histories * National web domains * Web archives as repositories of 'truth' The programme committee invite proposals for: * 30 minute presentations (i.e., 20 minutes for presentation plus 10 minutes for questions) * 60 minute panel discussions or multi-presentations * Conference themed workshops (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Tutorials focusing on particular tools (proposed length to be agreed with organisers) * Posters with accompanying 5 minute lightning talks Proposals for presentations and panels must be submitted as an abstract of between 300 and 500 words. Proposals for workshops and tutorials should be 800 to 1,000 words and include information about coordinators, format, target participant numbers and technical requirements. Proposals should demonstrate how the presentation, panel or workshop contributes to understanding web archiving histories or futures and the general themes relating to building, maintaining and researching web archives. Proposal should be accompanied by 3 to 5 keywords. Based on the abstracts, the programme committee may invite the submission of full papers for future publication. Please submit your proposals using EasyChair https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__easychair.org_conferences_-3Fconf-3Diipc2018&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=k9Q4PTgnXjVOoHhOcg4ipdT9snuMPM5o_1eOEnoFbNo&e= For questions, please e-mail iipc2018 at iipc.simplelists.com The deadline for submissions is 28 February 2018. All submissions will be reviewed by the WAC18 Programme Committee and submitters will be notified by 16 April 2018. For more information and updates, see: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__netpreserve.org_ga2018_&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=c8xwfYuiYiFPUCQZDwPVM2MEDDdBtA_jhExql2JyO50&e= @NetPreserve #iipcWAC18 ---- To subscribe, unsubscribe, or modify your subscription, please visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mail.asis.org_mailman_listinfo_pasig-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=vgslqzf3hmuPmJQe1wxWxKG6MrZHg6ROY2unZh0r2Oo&e= _______ PASIG Webinars and conference material is at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.preservationandarchivingsig.org_index.html&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=qHaONA3il7PUq1EbGqnwdWprkwa45zV-ImjQqLby6Pk&e= _______________________________________________ Pasig-discuss mailing list Pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mail.asis.org_mailman_listinfo_pasig-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=vgslqzf3hmuPmJQe1wxWxKG6MrZHg6ROY2unZh0r2Oo&e= Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le d?truire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Globecast decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Globecast is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ---- To subscribe, unsubscribe, or modify your subscription, please visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mail.asis.org_mailman_listinfo_pasig-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=vgslqzf3hmuPmJQe1wxWxKG6MrZHg6ROY2unZh0r2Oo&e= _______ PASIG Webinars and conference material is at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.preservationandarchivingsig.org_index.html&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=qHaONA3il7PUq1EbGqnwdWprkwa45zV-ImjQqLby6Pk&e= _______________________________________________ Pasig-discuss mailing list Pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mail.asis.org_mailman_listinfo_pasig-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=SkgBQhHU5zi-SCBXIxW1v8FMfoDITN9B5cSNTtLqczg&m=PPHATDd6qsXYb7roxHK25QvvMDeWX0EeAdHLBFyCrws&s=vgslqzf3hmuPmJQe1wxWxKG6MrZHg6ROY2unZh0r2Oo&e= From speltzman at library.ucla.edu Tue Dec 12 11:50:25 2017 From: speltzman at library.ucla.edu (Peltzman, Shira) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:50:25 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Introducing the 'UC Guidelines for Born-Digital Archival Description' Message-ID: **this announcement will be cross-posted** To improve the clarity and usefulness of finding aids and to promote consistency across campuses, a working group of University of California digital archivists has collaborated to develop a descriptive standard for born-digital archival material. The 'UC Guidelines for Born-Digital Archival Description' are available for download here: https://github.com/uc-borndigital-ckg/uc-guidelines The guidelines, which will be implemented on a system-wide basis in the coming year, include the following: * recommendations for describing born-digital content in an archival finding aid using 12 standard elements such as Scope and Content, Processing Information, and Organization and Arrangement. * guidance on determining an appropriate level and method of description of born-digital components * a minimum standard requirement for finding aids created within in the UC system * a metadata crosswalk to map the elements described in these guidelines to their relevant counterparts in DACS, EAD3, ArchivesSpace, MARC, RDA, and ISAD(G) * a comprehensive controlled vocabulary for born-digital source media and for other relevant born-digital terms, developed by Courtney Dean, Margaret Hughes, Kelly Kress at UCLA. * a sample finding aid To learn more about the background, development, and working method used to create the UC Guidelines for Born-Digital Archival Description, take a look at today's bloggERS! Post: https://saaers.wordpress.com/2017/12/12/introducing-the-uc-guidelines-for-born-digital-archival-description/ We welcome comments and feedback. If you have questions about the standard or suggestions for how it could be improved or leveraged, please don't hesitate to be in touch. Best, Shira Peltzman on behalf of co-authors Annalise Berdini, Charlie Macquarie, and Kate Tasker -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From macondro at Central.UH.EDU Tue Dec 12 18:36:05 2017 From: macondro at Central.UH.EDU (Condron, Melody A) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:36:05 -0600 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Personal Digital Archiving 2018: Call for Proposals Message-ID: <5935382561696140934ADF95AE0A6677A8F436B936@EXSERVER5.cougarnet.uh.edu> Please Share: Save the Date! Personal Digital Archiving 2018 #pda18 April 23-25 2018 in Houston, TX Hosted by the University of Houston Libraries PDA is the only conference focused on the personal digital archive, including projects and presentations from both individuals and organizations. Personal Digital Archiving 2018 invites proposals on a variety of relevant topics, including: * Examples of successful projects or learning experiences related to personal digital archives * Why personal digital archives matter to individuals, communities, and organizations * Distinctions between personal information management and the archive * Key threats to personal digital archives, including cost, disaster, technology change, and social threats * Applying selection criteria or other management tools for personal digital archives * The digital archive during a person's life and after death * Management tools and techniques for personal digital archives PDA is a 2-day, single-track conference featuring shorter sessions and panel discussion, followed by a day of in-depth workshops and events. Early registration (open now) is just $60 for students / $90 for non-students. More information about the conference will be posted at the event website: http://libraries.uh.edu/about/news-events/pda18/ Share & invite others on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/events/148890609056776/ CALL FOR PROPOSALS Deadline for submission of proposals: December 22, 2017 Notification of acceptance: Mid-January 2018 For PDA 2018, we seek to create a balanced mix of personal information management and personal digital archiving, in addition to a showcase for exciting and innovative projects and programs. We strongly encourage proposals from a wide-range of people and organizations. These may include but are not limited to: community organizations focused on gathering oral histories or other local collections, academia, graduate students of all levels in all related disciplines, those preserving familial material, activist groups, hobbyists, tool developers, and information professionals such as archivists, librarians, and curators. For proposals focusing on sharing practice, please note that we are not seeking "perfect" archiving solutions and strongly encourage proposals discussing "good enough" preservation and challenges or roadblocks to archiving this content. Submit your proposal here: http://libraries.uh.edu/about/news-events/pda18/call-for-proposals/ Melody Condron, Chair PDA 2018 Planning Committee macondron at uh.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From veryfamous at gmail.com Wed Dec 13 13:29:11 2017 From: veryfamous at gmail.com (veryfamous at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:29:11 +0100 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] New publication: Archives in Liquid Times In-Reply-To: <5a3170b4.53b8500a.b159f.2270@mx.google.com> References: <5a3170b4.53b8500a.b159f.2270@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5a317172.6f9e500a.34c02.112d@mx.google.com> Sorry for crossposting Out now: ?Archives in Liquid Times? aims to broaden and deepen the thinking about archives in today?s digital environment. It is a book that tries to fuel the debate about archives in different fields of research. It shows that in these liquid times, archives need and deserve to be considered from different angles. ?Archives in Liquid Times? is a publication in which archival science is linked to philosophy (of information) and data science. Not only do the contributors try to open windows to new concepts and perspectives, but also to new uses of existing concepts concerning archives.? The articles in this book contain philosophical reflections, speculative essays and presentations of new models and concepts alongside well-known topics in archival theory. Among the contributors are scholars from different fields of research, like Wolfgang Ernst, Geoffrey Yeo, Martijn van Otterlo, Charles Jeurgens and Geert-Jan van Bussel.?This book includes interviews with Luciano Floridi and Eric Ketelaar, in which they reflect on key issues arising from the contributions. The editors are Arnoud Glaudemans, Rienk Jonker and Frans Smit. Free digital downloads are available on: -?https://labyrinth.rienkjonker.nl/cont?/archives-liquid-times?(direct in PDF and in epub at the bottom of the page) -?tiny.cc/LiqArch?and?tinyurl.com/liqarch?(in a viewer) With kind regards Rienk Jonker -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tcramer at stanford.edu Thu Dec 14 21:38:07 2017 From: tcramer at stanford.edu (Tom Cramer) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 02:38:07 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] call for participation: IIPC survey on web archive training needs Message-ID: <0FC622E4-CE7A-4A0F-9D93-8B4471147316@stanford.edu> Do you (or your institution) archive the web? If so, how do you get training on the skills, tools and knowledge needed to do so effectively? What kind of training would you most like to have? The goal of this effort is to give people the critical ?how to? information and skills they need for practical, effective web archiving. This will lead to more and better archives, and a larger and stronger field. We invite all individuals and institutions engaged in web archiving to respond to a brief, 16-question survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/V7MVXXW The survey will be available from now through the end of January 2018. The results will help us both shape the training and to prioritize needs to target first. If you are interested in helping in this endeavor, you can read more about us here: http://netpreserve.org/about-us/working-groups/training-working-group/ Many thanks, The IIPC Training Working Group -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From A.K.Ghumra at bham.ac.uk Mon Dec 18 07:18:42 2017 From: A.K.Ghumra at bham.ac.uk (Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management)) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:18:42 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Message-ID: Hi All, Since it's quite here I've been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by "Preservation Storage" and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria "Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2" which I've been reviewing via the presentation "Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria" by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in : https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sschaefer at ucsd.edu Mon Dec 18 12:36:06 2017 From: sschaefer at ucsd.edu (Schaefer, Sibyl) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:36:06 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] iPRES 2018 Preliminary Call for Contributions Message-ID: iPRES 2018 BOSTON - Where Art and Science Meet - The Art In the Science & The Science In the Art of Digital Preservation - will be co-hosted by MIT Libraries and Harvard Library on September 24-27, 2018. Help us celebrate the first 15 Years of iPRES, the premier international conference on the preservation and long-term management of digital materials. This preliminary call for contributions seeks abstracts for papers that tell stories about bridging knowledge gaps in teams, implementing technologies, and overcoming barriers towards proper digital stewarding of digital items, assets, works and collections. Be creative. Be inspiring. Be inclusive. The theme of the call - where art and science meet - aims to broaden the variety of voices and approaches that fall under the nomenclature of digital preservation. In keeping with the theme, the program committee will embrace creative proposals that demonstrate how research and theory directly impact and influence practice at all levels. Important Dates Detailed submission information will be available in January 2018. Paper abstracts due February 15, 2018. All other submissions due April 2018. See iPres2018.org for the full text of the Preliminary Call for Contributions. Best, Sibyl Sibyl Schaefer Chronopolis Program Manager // Digital Preservation Analyst University of California, San Diego -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.guillermo at libnova.com Mon Dec 18 13:31:59 2017 From: a.guillermo at libnova.com (Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA)) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:31:59 +0100 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Aslam, We currently provide a digital preservation-specific Operating System (LIBDATAos), on top of a high density, low cost, high robustness hardware. The main benefits we see for our customers are: - Preservation-specific features (see the attached brochure for details), but: - Hashing could be done directly by the storage appliance using an API (20x faster hashing performance over traditional server-based approach) - There are WORM-protected areas. System-level protection for modification or deletion with some rules. - Including DarkSync mode, with advanced file replication, without propagating deletions and overwrites directly and the ability to generate system-wide manifests of storage contents. - Highly secure with embedded bit rot protection, standard ZFS filesystem (extended Z1, Z2 or Z3 data protection of every 12 disks). Storage mountable using standard CIFS (including SMB v3) and NFS, among other protocols. - High density, with 2PB of raw capacity in a 42U rack, or 216TB for each 4U appliance. - Low cost, with very low cost of acquisition and operation. - NBD support nearly in every State. - Very easy to manage. Everything is done using a management web interface. When you use the LIBDATA storage combined with the LIBSAFE Integrated Digital Preservation Repository software, you also get a lot of extended benefits. Best regards, AG. ---- Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. www.libnova.com EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 94 USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA [t]: +1 855-542-6682 *From:* Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] *On Behalf Of *Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2017 1:19 PM *To:* *Subject:* [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it?s quite here I?ve been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by ?Preservation Storage? and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria ?Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2? which I?ve been reviewing via the presentation ?Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria? by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in *: *https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ENG 2017.11.01 libdata catalog and technical details.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 878907 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jonathan.tilbury at preservica.com Tue Dec 19 03:42:36 2017 From: jonathan.tilbury at preservica.com (Jonathan Tilbury) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:42:36 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would recommend this YouTube video to explain the features required for a full Digital Preservation system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MoUIEpYCvU Jon From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) Sent: 18 December 2017 12:19 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it's quite here I've been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by "Preservation Storage" and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria "Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2" which I've been reviewing via the presentation "Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria" by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in : https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sschaefer at ucsd.edu Tue Dec 19 12:48:28 2017 From: sschaefer at ucsd.edu (Schaefer, Sibyl) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:48:28 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Message-ID: <9EA50776-731D-40F1-88D0-7F30D542BCE0@ucsd.edu> Hi Aslam- I presented at PASIG 2017 on behalf of our Digital Preservation Storage Criteria group. There were updates about and discussions of the DP storage criteria at the Library of Congress Storage Conference this year and last and workshops at iPres 2016 and 2017. We?ve gotten great feedback and we?re using that to work on version 3 ? watch for updates. We are working to open up the discussion of digital preservation storage ? scope, objectives, evolving options ? more and more broadly within the digital preservation community. Subject: Proposed Digital Preservation Storage Criteria ver. 2 for community discussion Last year in preparation for an iPRES2016 workshop called ?What is Preservation Storage??, a group of us collaborated on a potential list of criteria for digital preservation storage. It was also presented at the Designing Storage Architectures for Digital Collections 2016 meeting hosted by the Library of Congress, and briefly at the PASIG Fall 2016 meeting. Based on the feedback from these meetings, we produced a Version 2 of the criteria. We are now sharing the revised criteria on several lists (apologies if you see this multiple times) ? hoping to spark a broader community discussion about the criteria. Please visit this google group to share your feedback about the digital preservation storage criteria document. Look forward to hearing from you! DP Storage Criteria 2 contributors Best, Sibyl Sibyl Schaefer Chronopolis Program Manager // Digital Preservation Analyst University of California, San Diego From: Pasig-discuss on behalf of "Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management)" Date: Monday, December 18, 2017 at 4:18 AM To: "pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org" Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it?s quite here I?ve been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by ?Preservation Storage? and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria ?Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2? which I?ve been reviewing via the presentation ?Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria? by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in : https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nancymcg at mit.edu Tue Dec 19 09:39:31 2017 From: nancymcg at mit.edu (Nancy Y McGovern) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:39:31 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6F5A5DF531C03849A06A72571A635EB5CEF6A10B@OC11EXPO32.exchange.mit.edu> Sibyl Schaefer did a great job presenting at PASIG 2017 on behalf of our Digital Preservation Storage Criteria group. This update (below) was posted on digital preservation lists in May of this yea (with links to the group and the document). There were updates about and discussions of the DP storage criteria at the Library of Congress Storage Conference this year and last and workshops at iPres 2016 and 2017. We've gotten great feedback and we're using that to work on version 3 - watch for updates. We are working to open up the discussion of digital preservation storage - scope, objectives, evolving options - more and more broadly within the digital preservation community. Best- Nance Subject: Proposed Digital Preservation Storage Criteria ver. 2 for community discussion Last year in preparation for an iPRES2016 workshop called "What is Preservation Storage?", a group of us collaborated on a potential list of criteria for digital preservation storage. It was also presented at the Designing Storage Architectures for Digital Collections 2016 meeting hosted by the Library of Congress, and briefly at the PASIG Fall 2016 meeting. Based on the feedback from these meetings, we produced a Version 2 of the criteria. We are now sharing the revised criteria on several lists (apologies if you see this multiple times) - hoping to spark a broader community discussion about the criteria. Please visit this google group to share your feedback about the digital preservation storage criteria document. Look forward to hearing from you! DP Storage Criteria 2 contributors From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Tilbury Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:43 AM To: Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) ; pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: Re: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers I would recommend this YouTube video to explain the features required for a full Digital Preservation system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MoUIEpYCvU Jon From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) Sent: 18 December 2017 12:19 To: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it's quite here I've been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by "Preservation Storage" and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria "Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2" which I've been reviewing via the presentation "Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria" by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in : https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rguenther52 at gmail.com Tue Dec 19 16:34:50 2017 From: rguenther52 at gmail.com (Rebecca Guenther) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] PREMIS 3 OWL Ontology Draft available for review Message-ID: Apologies for cross posting. The PREMIS OWL Ontology Revision Working Group is pleased to announce a draft release of the PREMIS 3.0 ontology. This ontology updates the existing PREMIS 2.2 ontology and is designed to be used in conjunction with the PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, version 3.0 , released in 2015. The PREMIS Data Dictionary is based on a data model that defines the entities that are described (Objects, Events, Agents and Rights), the properties of those entities (semantic units), and relationships between them. A major update to the Data Dictionary, version 3, was completed in 2015, which included a revision of the data model. The PREMIS OWL ontology is an RDF encoding of that data model to provide a Linked Data-friendly data management function for a preservation repository, allowing for SPARQL querying. It integrates PREMIS information with other Linked Data compliant data sets, such as format registries and controlled vocabularies, allowing interconnections between different repository databases. The first version of the PREMIS OWL ontology was based on the PREMIS Data Dictionary version 2.2. The PREMIS Editorial Committee convened a working group to revise the earlier PREMIS OWL ontology to reflect the changes in PREMIS version 3.0 and reconsider modeling decisions in the earlier ontology. This revision has substantially remodeled the previous ontology, incorporating emerging Linked Data best practices and connections to other relevant RDF ontologies, e.g. PROV-O (Provenance ontology), Dublin Core metadata terms , and the preservation vocabularies at http://id.loc.gov/preservationdescriptions/ , among others. The working group encourages people in the preservation, metadata and linked data communities to review and provide comments before it is finalized; the review period will end on March 23, 2018. Documents are available at: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/ontology/owl-version3.html . Comments may be sent to the following list: premis-ontology-review-2018 at googlegroups.com . We hope that community members will find this list a useful resource, and that they will consider reading and responding to other comments as well as posting their own. The following people participated in the PREMIS OWL Ontology Revision Working Group: Charles Blair (University of Chicago) Lina Bountouri (Publications Office, European Union) Bertrand Caron (Biblioth?que nationale de France) Esm? Cowles (Princeton University) Rebecca Guenther (Consultant, Library of Congress) Angela DiIorio (Sapienza Universit? di Roma) Evelyn McLellan (Artefactual Systems) Elizabeth Russey Roke (Emory University) Rebecca Rebecca Squire Guenther 215 W. 75th St. Apt. 16H New York, NY 10023 703-298-0157 rguenther52 at gmail.com http://www.meetyourdata.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.guillermo at libnova.com Wed Dec 20 09:48:58 2017 From: a.guillermo at libnova.com (Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA)) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:48:58 +0100 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9aec8d4f5201ad04a898aa3841507e5b@mail.gmail.com> Dear Michelle, Thank you for your interest. You have two main options when dealing with this problem and using the products we offer. The first one is to use LIBSAFE (a software to create the preservation repository; you can use the software we provide, but probably other equivalent solutions in the market like Preservica/Archivematica/etc. would also do the job) to create the digital preservation repository and use LIBDATA to save one or more of the copies in LIBDATA appliances. This way, the LIBSAFE software is in charge of making several copies, hash files within the defined period (for fixity check), manage versions, store metadata, give you a search interface, validate/characterize file formats, etc. In LIBSAFE you simply go to Storage Groups and create them. Inside every group you create one or more mountpoints: [image: cid:image002.jpg at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] And you can indicate where LIBSAFE should make the copies of the ingested objects: [image: cid:image006.jpg at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] This way, you get a fully managed system. You don?t need to care about where one object is stored (you can always know that, but you don?t need to). The repository software is used to create an abstraction layer that gives you access to your objects (you can search by metadata, instead of looking at a filesystem, you leave trace of every action, etc.) and takes care of all the complexity, like the periodic hashing, storage healing, migration, etc. For instance, every time you ingest one object, if you have configured LIBSAFE to make three copies: one in your datacenter A, another in your datacenter B and another in the Amazon S3 cloud, LIBSAFE will make them by itself and then verify them from time to time. If you look at the underlying storage, you just see a list of folders (one folder = one preserved object) and, inside, the same files you ingested, without any renaming or structure change, plus some XML files with the object?s metadata, fixity information (hashes), etc. [image: cid:image007.png at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] *Note that, when using LIBSAFE to create your repository, you are not forced to use LIBDATA for storage. It can use almost any storage sold nowadays (CIFS and/or cloud). Using LIBDATA for one of your copies is just convenient, efficient and affordable.* The other option is to just use the LIBDATA storage. Without any repository software. You lose a lot of functionality, but you can certainly do it. My personal opinion is that, if you have a decent collection and you need to buy hardware, it is not going to be worth not to include a repository software and get the full package. The total cost of the system, including the repository software, is not a lot more and you get much more protection and benefits (you get the base for a true preservation system), but, hey!, we sell the software, what are you going to expect! :) The LIBDATA appliances have enough functionality to replicate themselves using rsync attending to digital preservation-oriented best practices (with the possibility not to replicate deletions and/or overwrites or to replicate them a few days later, warn you if the replication is affecting a lot of files, fixity traking, etc.). (note the ?DarkSync IP?, Sync Protect options, etc. in this LIBDATA manager interface) And disk management/replacement is fully managed: In your case, you are going to get much better advice from other members of this list (you have the best of the best here) than from me, but, for starting, I would recommend sticking to the NDSA levels of preservation and point to a level 4, if you can afford it. This way, you are not talking to your IT about abstract thoughts. You are pointing to a widely community-accepted way to understand preservation, and, from this point, you can move your IT to have several number of copies, in several places, without anyone in your organization being able to delete them all, etc.. I can also remember a very good presentation the DPC made in last PASIG (sorry, I can?t remember if it was by Sharon or by William) with very interesting thoughts, guidelines and recommendations that can serve you to create the case. If you have interest, I can ask for credentials for you to access a LIBSAFE repository software and/or access to a LIBDATA appliance to play with them. I?m also attaching some LIBSAFE information. Best regards, AG. --- Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. www.libnova.com EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 94 USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA [t]: +1 855-542-6682 *From:* Lindlar, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Lindlar at tib.eu] *Sent:* Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:18 PM *To:* Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA) ; pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org *Subject:* AW: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Dear Antonio, all, I have a specific question about LIBDATA. I understand it to be HW with a SW storage management layer. Does it support multiple independent copies as well as geographically spread storage clusters? Coming from a digital preservation unit which is not embedded into the organization?s IT department, those are the two issues I find hardest to explain to IT as a digital preservation need. Looking through your brochure I didn?t see pointers towards those issues (might be me just not having seen them), so I was wondering what the thoughts are on this. Cheers, ML Michelle Lindlar Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) German National Library of Science and Technology Digital Preservation Welfengarten 1 B // 30167 Hannover, Germany T +49 511 762-19826 michelle.lindlar at tib.eu www.tib.eu *Von:* Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org ] *Im Auftrag von *Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA) *Gesendet:* Montag, 18. Dezember 2017 19:32 *An:* pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org *Betreff:* Re: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Dear Aslam, We currently provide a digital preservation-specific Operating System (LIBDATAos), on top of a high density, low cost, high robustness hardware. The main benefits we see for our customers are: - Preservation-specific features (see the attached brochure for details), but: - Hashing could be done directly by the storage appliance using an API (20x faster hashing performance over traditional server-based approach) - There are WORM-protected areas. System-level protection for modification or deletion with some rules. - Including DarkSync mode, with advanced file replication, without propagating deletions and overwrites directly and tDhe ability to generate system-wide manifests of storage contents. - Highly secure with embedded bit rot protection, standard ZFS filesystem (extended Z1, Z2 or Z3 data protection of every 12 disks). Storage mountable using standard CIFS (including SMB v3) and NFS, among other protocols. - High density, with 2PB of raw capacity in a 42U rack, or 216TB for each 4U appliance. - Low cost, with very low cost of acquisition and operation. - NBD support nearly in every State. - Very easy to manage. Everything is done using a management web interface. When you use the LIBDATA storage combined with the LIBSAFE Integrated Digital Preservation Repository software, you also get a lot of extended benefits. Best regards, AG. ---- Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. www.libnova.com EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 94 USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA [t]: +1 855-542-6682 *From:* Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] *On Behalf Of *Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2017 1:19 PM *To:* *Subject:* [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it?s quite here I?ve been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by ?Preservation Storage? and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria ?Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2? which I?ve been reviewing via the presentation ?Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria? by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in *: *https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 45760 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 35647 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 22450 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 43133 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 82944 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LS4 SHORT - ENG CULT Digital Preservation v7.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 2807763 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Michelle.Lindlar at tib.eu Wed Dec 20 06:18:07 2017 From: Michelle.Lindlar at tib.eu (Lindlar, Michelle) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:18:07 +0100 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Antonio, all, I have a specific question about LIBDATA. I understand it to be HW with a SW storage management layer. Does it support multiple independent copies as well as geographically spread storage clusters? Coming from a digital preservation unit which is not embedded into the organization?s IT department, those are the two issues I find hardest to explain to IT as a digital preservation need. Looking through your brochure I didn?t see pointers towards those issues (might be me just not having seen them), so I was wondering what the thoughts are on this. Cheers, ML Michelle Lindlar Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) German National Library of Science and Technology Digital Preservation Welfengarten 1 B // 30167 Hannover, Germany T +49 511 762-19826 michelle.lindlar at tib.eu www.tib.eu Von: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] Im Auftrag von Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA) Gesendet: Montag, 18. Dezember 2017 19:32 An: pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org Betreff: Re: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Dear Aslam, We currently provide a digital preservation-specific Operating System (LIBDATAos), on top of a high density, low cost, high robustness hardware. The main benefits we see for our customers are: * Preservation-specific features (see the attached brochure for details), but: * Hashing could be done directly by the storage appliance using an API (20x faster hashing performance over traditional server-based approach) * There are WORM-protected areas. System-level protection for modification or deletion with some rules. * Including DarkSync mode, with advanced file replication, without propagating deletions and overwrites directly and tDhe ability to generate system-wide manifests of storage contents. * Highly secure with embedded bit rot protection, standard ZFS filesystem (extended Z1, Z2 or Z3 data protection of every 12 disks). Storage mountable using standard CIFS (including SMB v3) and NFS, among other protocols. * High density, with 2PB of raw capacity in a 42U rack, or 216TB for each 4U appliance. * Low cost, with very low cost of acquisition and operation. * NBD support nearly in every State. * Very easy to manage. Everything is done using a management web interface. When you use the LIBDATA storage combined with the LIBSAFE Integrated Digital Preservation Repository software, you also get a lot of extended benefits. Best regards, AG. ---- Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. www.libnova.com EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 94 USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA [t]: +1 855-542-6682 From: Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] On Behalf Of Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 1:19 PM To: Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers Hi All, Since it?s quite here I?ve been able to review the conference notes of PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) regarding preservation storage. She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some suppliers but was collating more. We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant by ?Preservation Storage? and how does that differentiate to normal archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. There is a criteria ?Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2? which I?ve been reviewing via the presentation ?Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation storage criteria? by Sibyl Schaefer. Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly received. Aslam Ghumra Research Data Management ____________________________ IT Services Elms Road Data Centre Building G5 Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT T: 0121 414 5877 F; 0121 414 3952 Skype : JanitorX Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp in : https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From catherine.peebles at yale.edu Wed Dec 20 14:17:30 2017 From: catherine.peebles at yale.edu (Peebles, Catherine) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 19:17:30 +0000 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] =?windows-1252?q?NDSR_Art_Symposium_CFP_-_Is_This?= =?windows-1252?q?_Permanence=3A_Preservation_of_Born-digital_Artists=92_A?= =?windows-1252?q?rchives?= Message-ID: *apologies for cross-posting* Will the art of the digital age last even one lifetime? If cloud computing fails, where will our documentation be? As the internet pioneer Vint Cerf recently asserted in conversation with Rhizome?s preservation director, Dragan Espenschied, ?Preservation by accident is not a plan,? begging the questions, What is the plan? and Do we have one? If we do not develop solutions now, we risk losing not only born-digital artwork but artists? archives as well, effectively erasing the work and memory of this generation and subsequent generations? art history. Today, an artist?s closetful of cardboard boxes is likely stuffed with old laptops and iPhones along with analog ephemera, handwritten letters, snapshots, and postcards. Artists? archives are increasingly hybrid collections, requiring new, adaptable preservation methods. Even artists working in traditional media like painting and sculpture rely on born-digital methods to help create their art, manage records, and promote their work, while other artists create solely with born-digital materials. What does this mean for artists and their archives?both presently and in the future? Will these integral records that constitute the history of an artist?s practice and oeuvre be available at the end of this decade, let alone to scholars of later generations? Hosted by the Yale Center for British Art, this National Digital Stewardship Residency for Art Information (NDSR Art) symposium will be held on May 11, 2018. It will explore topics engaging the theme of born-digital preservation and artists? archives, including the following: artists? use of born-digital methods within their practice as means of creation as well as documentation; the state of the field for artists and those who steward their collections and archives; what is being done by artists, museums, archivists, and librarians to steward and preserve the born-digital components of artists? records?; how are born-digital tools changing artists? studio practice, and what have we already lost?; and how are museum archives handling hybrid and born-digital artists? archives?where among these bits and bytes is the artist?s hand? NDSR Art would like to hear about case studies from artists, librarians, and archivists working with born-digital records, their challenges, and possible preservation solutions; what tools are being used, adapted, and developed for the digital preservation of artists? archives? This event is co-sponsored by: the Yale Center for British Art, the Robert B. Haas Family Arts Library, Yale University Library Digital Preservation Services, Art Libraries Society of North America (ARLIS/ NA), and the National Digital Stewardship Residency for Art Information (NDSR Art). Please submit a proposal of three hundred words maximum for consideration no later than February 15, 2018 to Cate Peebles, NDSR Art, Postgraduate Research Associate: catherine.peebles at yale.edu Cate Peebles Postgraduate Associate, Archives National Digital Stewardship Resident for Art Information Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street, PO Box 208280 New Haven, CT 06520-8280 +1 475-202-2390 | britishart.yale.edu CURRENT EXHIBITION Britain in the World Yale Center for British Art Reinstallation UPCOMING EXHIBITION The Paston Treasure: Microcosm of the Known World Yale Center for British Art: February 15?May 27, 2018 TRAVELING EXHIBITION ?Things of Beauty Growing?: British Studio Pottery The Fitzwilliam Museum, University of Cambridge: March 20?June 18, 2018 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rosalynmetz at gmail.com Wed Dec 20 16:59:54 2017 From: rosalynmetz at gmail.com (Rosalyn Metz) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Call for Papers extension - Open Repositories 2018: Sustaining Open Message-ID: **Please excuse cross posting** *The 13th International Conference on Open Repositories, OR2018, will be held on June 4th-7th, 2018 in Bozeman, Montana, USA. * Call for papers and scholarships have been extended until the 15th January 2018. The theme for Open Repositories 2018 is Sustaining Open. http://www.or2018.net/call-for-papers/ Research and Cultural Heritage communities have embraced the idea of Open; open communities, open source software, open data, scholarly communications, and open access publications and collections. These projects and communities require different modes of thinking and resourcing than purchasing vended products. While open may be the way forward, mitigating fatigue, finding sustainable funding, and building flexible digital repository platforms is something most of us are striving for. Submissions this year should focus on the how, why, and what it will take to make open sustainable. While not limited to the below topics, we?re focusing our attention on issues around the sustainability of: ? Open source software - sustainability of software developed locally and large open source systems, legacy code ? Community - reaching out to new audiences, developing a community, governance ? Content - research data, digital preservation, persistent urls, archiving ? Teams/People - staff and knowledge within the community, contingency planning, training and development, and succession planning ? Projects - sustainability of projects beyond the grant, maturing communities ? Infrastructure/Integrations - integrations between systems, changing technical environments ? Policy - national, international, local and community policy and decisions ? Challenges of sustainability - funding, local, technical, community ? Rights and Copyright - including Data Protection, sharing and storing of content ? Reuse, standards, and reproducibility - for example: software, data, content types ? New open technologies and standards Submission Process Accepted proposals in all categories will be made available through the conference?s web site https://www.conftool.net/or2018, and later they and associated materials will be made available in an open repository. Some conference sessions may be live streamed or recorded, then made publicly available. *Interest Groups* This year there are no separate interest groups for the different repository systems, instead if your 24x7 or presentation submission is related to a specific repository system please indicate so in your proposal. Presentations Presentation proposals are expected to be two to four pages (see below for submission templates). Successful submissions in past years have typically described work relevant to a wide audience and applicable beyond a single software system. Presentations are 30 minutes long including questions. Panels Panel proposals are expected to be two to four pages (see below for submission templates). Successful submissions in past years have typically described work relevant to a wide audience and applicable beyond a single software system. All panels are expected to include at least some degree of diversity in viewpoints and personal background of the panelists. Panel sessions are expected to include a short presentation from each panel member followed by a discussion. Panels may take an entire session or may be combined with another submission. Panels can be 45 or 90 minutes long. *Discussion Question and Answer* Discussion Q&A proposals are expected to be two to four pages (see below for submission templates). This is your opportunity to suggest members of the community to join in a Q&A discussion on various proposed topics. This is meant to be a deep-dive into why a decision was made, how projects got started, where an idea came from, or anything else that you want to know more about. Imagine this as a 45 - 90 minute grilling at a cocktail party but on a stage in front of your peers. Q&As may take an entire session or may be combined with another submission. This session will not be video recorded. Discussion Q&A can be 45 or 90 minutes long. 24?7 Presentations 24?7 presentations are 7 minute presentations comprising no more than 24 slides. Successful 24x7 presentations have a clear focus on one or a few ideas and a narrower focus than a 25 minute presentation. Similar to Pecha Kuchas or Lightning Talks, these 24?7 presentations will be grouped into blocks based on conference themes, with each block followed by a moderated question and answer session involving the audience and all block presenters. This format will provide conference goers with a fast-paced survey of like work across many institutions. Proposals for 24?7 presentations should be one to two pages (see below for submission templates). 24x7 presentations are 7 minutes long. Posters We invite one-page proposals for posters that showcase current work (see below for submission templates). OR2018 will feature physical posters only. Posters will be on display throughout the conference. Instructions for preparing the posters will be distributed to authors of accepted poster proposals prior to the conference. Poster submitters will be expected to give a one-minute teaser to encourage visitors to their poster during the conference. Posters presentations will be 1 minute. *Developer Track: Top Tips, Cunning Code and Imaginative Innovation* Each year a significant proportion of the delegates at Open Repositories are software developers who work on repository software or related services. OR2018 will feature a Developer Track that will provide a focus for showcasing work and exchanging ideas. Building on the success of previous Developer Tracks, where we encouraged live hacking and audience participation, we invite members of the technical community to share the features, systems, tools and best practices that are important to you (see below for submission templates). The 15 minute presentations can be as informal as you like, but we encourage live demonstrations, tours of code repositories, examples of cool features, and the unique viewpoints that so many members of our community possess. Proposals should be one to two pages, including a title, a brief outline of what will be shared with the community, and technologies covered. Developers are also encouraged to contribute to the other tracks. Developer Track presentations are 15 minutes including questions. Ideas Challenge OR2018 will also again include the popular Ideas Challenge. Taking part in this competition provides an opportunity to take an active role in repository innovation, in collaboration with your peers and in pursuit of prizes. The Ideas Challenge is open to all conference attendees. Further details and guidance on the Ideas Challenge will be forthcoming closer to the conference. Workshops and tutorials The first day of Open Repositories will be dedicated to workshops and tutorials. One to two-page proposals addressing theoretical or practical issues around digital repositories are welcomed. See below for Proposal Templates; please address the following in your proposal: ? The subject of the event and what knowledge you intend to convey ? Length of session (90 minutes, 3 hours or a whole day) ? A brief statement on the learning outcomes from the session ? The target audience for your session and how many attendees you plan to accommodate ? Technology and facility requirements ? Any other supplies or support required ? Anything else you believe is pertinent to carrying out the session Please note, the program committee may consider submissions for other tracks and formats, as appropriate. Submission System https://www.conftool.net/or2018 Review Process All submissions will be peer reviewed and evaluated according to the criteria outlined in the call for proposals, including quality of content, significance, originality, and thematic fit. Code of Conduct The OR2018 Code of Conduct and Anti-Harassment Policy are available at http://or2018.net/code-of-conduct/ . Scholarship Programme OR2018 will again run a Scholarship Programme which will enable us to provide support for a small number of full registered places (including the poster reception and conference dinner) for the conference in Bozeman. The programme is open to librarians, repository managers, developers and researchers in digital libraries and related fields. Applicants submitting a proposal for the conference will be given priority consideration for funding. Please note that the programme does not cover costs such as accommodation, travel and subsistence. It is anticipated that the applicant?s home institution will provide financial support to supplement the OR Scholarship Award. Full details and an application form will shortly be available on the conference website. Key Dates ? 15 January 2018: Deadline for submissions ? 15 January 2018: Deadline for Scholarship Programme applications ? 09 February 2018: Submitters notified of acceptance to Workshops ? 12 February 2018: Registration opens ? 21 February 2018: Submitters notified of acceptance to other tracks ? 21 February 2018: Scholarship Programme winners notified ? 23 February 2018: Submitters notified of acceptance of 24x7, posters, and developer track ? 20 April 2018: Close of Early Bird ? 25 May 2018: Presenter registration deadline ? 4-7 June 2018: OR2018 conference Program Co-Chairs Claire Knowles and Evviva Weinraub -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thutchi1 at swarthmore.edu Fri Dec 22 11:53:38 2017 From: thutchi1 at swarthmore.edu (Tom Hutchinson) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers In-Reply-To: <9aec8d4f5201ad04a898aa3841507e5b@mail.gmail.com> References: <9aec8d4f5201ad04a898aa3841507e5b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, Aslam ? Preservation is a broad term. The idea is how to keep information over an extended period. Most of preservation is not technical, it is organizational. At this time, technical aspects involve two main areas. One is ensuring your data is in a format that you can actually read (e.g. a zip disk of Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheets may be in perfect condition but is useless without the hardware to read the media and the software to understand the files) The other is ensuring that good data does not become corrupted. Files can become corrupted ("bit rot"). If you don't notice when it happens, your backups will simply contain the bad files too. A backup alone is not preservation because it doesn't insure the the actual information stays valid and usable. The standard way of "noticing" files have gone bad is to calculate checksums (aka hashes, or in preservation parlance, "fixity checks"). To see if a file has been corrupted, recalculate the checksum and compare it with the old checksum. One problem with this approach is that you won't be able to tell if the file itself has been corrupted or if the checksum was corrupted (or both). To standard way around this having multiple copies of checksums. You can improve on checksums by using error correcting codes, such as with the tool par2, and with cryptographic signatures, such as with the tool gpg. Checksums and backups alone will get you pretty far. Using checksums assumes that the files you started with were "good" - not corrupted and also properly made in the first place. Another popular check done is to see if your files are formatted properly. See if that .zip is actually a valid zip file. Is it readable? Does it conform to spec? "Preservation storage" is the idea of building in preservation abilities into the storage itself. My personal view is that it is a flawed approach. I encourage keeping preservation as a layer separate from storage. Don't throw your SAN in the trash just yet ;-) Storage should be a dumb commodity. Local storage, off the shelf cloud providers, off-site tape, etc are all perfectly fine. Pick solutions that will limit and detect errors, e.g. ZFS, but don't rely on them. Assume particular file, including stored checksums, will become corrupted. Your preservation layer is where to perform preservation activities. There you run your checksums. There you also look and see when the last time you ran checksums was. For many institutions, a DIY approach to preservation can make sense. Vendor solutions are also available. Some will sell you a preservation platform, either as a product you buy or a service they provide. You plug in your storage, their software runs on top. Many vendors will sell you both technical preservation and storage together, "preservation storage". These can be convenient one-stop shops. These tend toward the costly side and lack flexibility. However, they can be rather robust and usable. Many customers are quite happy with them. When considering a preservation storage solution, I'm a fan of the last slide in the 2017 "acid-free" presentation previously mentioned. Beware lock-in. Best of luck in your search. Please report back. Happy New Year. Tom On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA) < a.guillermo at libnova.com> wrote: > Dear Michelle, > > > > Thank you for your interest. You have two main options when dealing with > this problem and using the products we offer. > > > > The first one is to use LIBSAFE (a software to create the preservation > repository; you can use the software we provide, but probably other > equivalent solutions in the market like Preservica/Archivematica/etc. would > also do the job) to create the digital preservation repository and use > LIBDATA to save one or more of the copies in LIBDATA appliances. This way, > the LIBSAFE software is in charge of making several copies, hash files > within the defined period (for fixity check), manage versions, store > metadata, give you a search interface, validate/characterize file formats, > etc. > > > > In LIBSAFE you simply go to Storage Groups and create them. Inside every > group you create one or more mountpoints: > > [image: cid:image002.jpg at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] > > > > > > And you can indicate where LIBSAFE should make the copies of the ingested > objects: > > [image: cid:image006.jpg at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] > > > > This way, you get a fully managed system. You don?t need to care about > where one object is stored (you can always know that, but you don?t need > to). The repository software is used to create an abstraction layer that > gives you access to your objects (you can search by metadata, instead of > looking at a filesystem, you leave trace of every action, etc.) and takes > care of all the complexity, like the periodic hashing, storage healing, > migration, etc. > > > > For instance, every time you ingest one object, if you have configured > LIBSAFE to make three copies: one in your datacenter A, another in your > datacenter B and another in the Amazon S3 cloud, LIBSAFE will make them by > itself and then verify them from time to time. > > > > If you look at the underlying storage, you just see a list of folders (one > folder = one preserved object) and, inside, the same files you ingested, > without any renaming or structure change, plus some XML files with the > object?s metadata, fixity information (hashes), etc. > > > > [image: cid:image007.png at 01D379A8.4ABAF770] > > > > *Note that, when using LIBSAFE to create your repository, you are not > forced to use LIBDATA for storage. It can use almost any storage sold > nowadays (CIFS and/or cloud). Using LIBDATA for one of your copies is just > convenient, efficient and affordable.* > > > > The other option is to just use the LIBDATA storage. Without any > repository software. You lose a lot of functionality, but you can certainly > do it. My personal opinion is that, if you have a decent collection and you > need to buy hardware, it is not going to be worth not to include a > repository software and get the full package. The total cost of the system, > including the repository software, is not a lot more and you get much more > protection and benefits (you get the base for a true preservation system), > but, hey!, we sell the software, what are you going to expect! :) > > > > The LIBDATA appliances have enough functionality to replicate themselves > using rsync attending to digital preservation-oriented best practices (with > the possibility not to replicate deletions and/or overwrites or to > replicate them a few days later, warn you if the replication is affecting a > lot of files, fixity traking, etc.). > > > > (note the ?DarkSync IP?, Sync Protect options, etc. in this LIBDATA > manager interface) > > > > And disk management/replacement is fully managed: > > > > > > > > In your case, you are going to get much better advice from other members > of this list (you have the best of the best here) than from me, but, for > starting, I would recommend sticking to the NDSA levels of preservation and > point to a level 4, if you can afford it. This way, you are not talking to > your IT about abstract thoughts. You are pointing to a widely > community-accepted way to understand preservation, and, from this point, > you can move your IT to have several number of copies, in several places, > without anyone in your organization being able to delete them all, etc.. I > can also remember a very good presentation the DPC made in last PASIG > (sorry, I can?t remember if it was by Sharon or by William) with very > interesting thoughts, guidelines and recommendations that can serve you to > create the case. > > > > If you have interest, I can ask for credentials for you to access a > LIBSAFE repository software and/or access to a LIBDATA appliance to play > with them. I?m also attaching some LIBSAFE information. > > > > Best regards, AG. > > --- > > Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo > > libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. > > www.libnova.com > > > > EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 > 94 <+34%20914%2049%2008%2094> > > USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA > [t]: +1 855-542-6682 <(855)%20542-6682> > > > > *From:* Lindlar, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Lindlar at tib.eu] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:18 PM > *To:* Antonio Guillermo Martinez (LIBNOVA) ; > pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org > *Subject:* AW: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers > > > > Dear Antonio, > > all, > > > > I have a specific question about LIBDATA. I understand it to be HW with a > SW storage management layer. Does it support multiple independent copies as > well as geographically spread storage clusters? > Coming from a digital preservation unit which is not embedded into the > organization?s IT department, those are the two issues I find hardest to > explain to IT as a digital preservation need. > > Looking through your brochure I didn?t see pointers towards those issues > (might be me just not having seen them), so I was wondering what the > thoughts are on this. > > > > Cheers, > ML > > > > Michelle Lindlar > Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) > German National Library of Science and Technology > Digital Preservation > Welfengarten 1 B // 30167 Hannover, Germany > T +49 511 762-19826 <+49%20511%2076219826> > michelle.lindlar at tib.eu > www.tib.eu > > > > > > > > *Von:* Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org > ] *Im Auftrag von *Antonio Guillermo > Martinez (LIBNOVA) > *Gesendet:* Montag, 18. Dezember 2017 19:32 > *An:* pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org > *Betreff:* Re: [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers > > > > Dear Aslam, > > > > We currently provide a digital preservation-specific Operating System > (LIBDATAos), on top of a high density, low cost, high robustness hardware. > > > > The main benefits we see for our customers are: > > > > - Preservation-specific features (see the attached brochure for > details), but: > - Hashing could be done directly by the storage appliance using an > API (20x faster hashing performance over traditional server-based approach) > - There are WORM-protected areas. System-level protection for > modification or deletion with some rules. > - Including DarkSync mode, with advanced file replication, without > propagating deletions and overwrites directly and tDhe ability to > generate system-wide manifests of storage contents. > - Highly secure with embedded bit rot protection, standard ZFS > filesystem (extended Z1, Z2 or Z3 data protection of every 12 disks). > Storage mountable using standard CIFS (including SMB v3) and NFS, among > other protocols. > - High density, with 2PB of raw capacity in a 42U rack, or 216TB for > each 4U appliance. > - Low cost, with very low cost of acquisition and operation. > - NBD support nearly in every State. > - Very easy to manage. Everything is done using a management web > interface. > > > > When you use the LIBDATA storage combined with the LIBSAFE Integrated > Digital Preservation Repository software, you also get a lot of extended > benefits. > > > > Best regards, AG. > > ---- > > Antonio Guillermo Mart?nez Largo > > libnova ? Technology changes. Information prevails. > > www.libnova.com > > > > EMEA & LATAM: Paseo de la Castellana, 153 ? Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 > 94 <+34%20914%2049%2008%2094> > > USA & CANADA: 14 NE First Ave (2nd Floor) - Miami, Florida 33132, USA > [t]: +1 855-542-6682 <(855)%20542-6682> > > > > *From:* Pasig-discuss [mailto:pasig-discuss-bounces at asist.org] *On Behalf > Of *Aslam Ghumra (IT Services, Facilities Management) > *Sent:* Monday, December 18, 2017 1:19 PM > *To:* > *Subject:* [Pasig-discuss] Preservation Storage suppliers > > > > Hi All, > > > > Since it?s quite here I?ve been able to review the conference notes of > PASIG17 and there was a presentation from someone ( prob from the US ) > regarding preservation storage. > > > > She inferred in her talk that she has already had several chats with some > suppliers but was collating more. > > > > We have a storage solution, but I really want to understand what is meant > by ?Preservation Storage? and how does that differentiate to normal > archival storage or data where is it tiered off to an archive. > > > > There is a criteria ?Preservation Storage Criteria, Version 2? which I?ve > been reviewing via the presentation ?Acid-free AIPS: Digital preservation > storage criteria? by Sibyl Schaefer. > > > > Any pointers to suppliers whether you use them or not would be greatly > received. > > > > Aslam Ghumra > > Research Data Management > > ____________________________ > > IT Services > > Elms Road Data Centre > Building G5 > > Edgbaston > > Birmingham B15 2TT > > T: 0121 414 5877 > > F; 0121 414 3952 > > Skype : JanitorX > > Twitter : @aslamghumra @uob_rescomp > > in *: *https://uk.linkedin.com/in/aslam-ghumra-13907993 > > http://intranet.bham.ac.uk/bear > > > > ---- > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or modify your subscription, please visit > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/pasig-discuss > _______ > PASIG Webinars and conference material is at http://www. > preservationandarchivingsig.org/index.html > _______________________________________________ > Pasig-discuss mailing list > Pasig-discuss at mail.asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/pasig-discuss > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 43133 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 82944 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 22450 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 45760 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 35647 bytes Desc: not available URL: