[Chapters-l] Report on breakout sessions at Chapter Assembly
Doug Kaylor
doug.kaylor at wright.edu
Mon Dec 23 09:11:24 EST 2002
Although Dick responded to the list, let me add my own note of
explanation. I'm genuinely sorry if I caused any chapter leadership
alarm. There was never any discussion during my tenure as Assembly
Director about changing chapter finances. In fact, I did not talk to
Dick, Trudi, or anyone else before I brought the idea up at Chapter
Assembly. And then it was brought up as an example of a way to
streamline administrative requirements, not as a proposal.
But let me explain a little. This was an idea I had because after 5
years in Chapter Assembly leadership, I know that
(1) nobody likes doing all the financial reports, and chapters have had
trouble recruiting officers to be treasurer, (2) two years ago, several
chapters did not receive their rebates because they failed to file
timely reports, (3) we need to have those reports filed in a timely
fashion because of our audit requirements, our IRS filing requirements,
and because it's our formal Society policy, (4) we already have one
chapter that has HQ administer its funds, and (5) I figure that with
electronic communications and improved banking practices, HQ could
probably deal with it. I could easily imagine, for example, chapters
being able to "write a check" by filling out a secure web-based form and
clicking submit. I do electronic bill paying with my personal account,
why not a chapter? Another option out there might be issuing each
chapter a debit/credit card linked to the chapter account at HQ's bank.
One of the best things about ASIST chapters is their flexibility and
individuality. For some chapters, shifting the administrative overhead
to HQ might make it much easier to recruit leadership and operate -
especially when most of the overhead can be handled electronically.
Other chapters with different circumstances may want to keep as much
autonomy as possible. I think both options have merit, as long as
everyone remembers that chapters exist as an integral part of ASIST.
Another factor that I haven't mentioned is that the HQ staff might not
want to deal with it. They already have plenty to do and may see this as
an administrative nightmare. I don't really know because I never asked them.
Having apologized and explained my thinking, let me stir the pot a
little. Why not centralize banking? You might get a better return on
your money. You might cut down on your reporting requirements. You might
find that it's just a flexible as keeping everything local. If you don't
ask the questions and investigate the answers, you'll never know.
Happy holidays,
Doug
Glen Horton wrote:
> Thank you for your report, Doug. We in SOASIST want to make sure that
> moving chapter funds to HQ be optional and not mandatory for each
> chapter. Some chapters may wish to continue to manage their own bank
> accounts.
>
> Thanks,
> Glen Horton
> SOASIST Chair
>
More information about the Chapters-l
mailing list