From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Mon Feb 6 13:53:16 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes Message-ID: <92DD6669-CE32-479C-9ECD-17AFE3C634E8@yahoo.com> Folks I just cast the following votes: REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier Comments: ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following votes: REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier Comments: ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon Mark From mzeng at kent.edu Mon Feb 6 14:09:49 2017 From: mzeng at kent.edu (ZENG, MARCIA) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:09:49 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes In-Reply-To: <92DD6669-CE32-479C-9ECD-17AFE3C634E8@yahoo.com> References: <92DD6669-CE32-479C-9ECD-17AFE3C634E8@yahoo.com> Message-ID: So the first two will be reviewed, right? Good. The last one is not clear. So we agree with the withdraw of Z39.84, is this the vote? Last, Good idea to have NISO standard being kept even the ISO one is there. As you said, and we discussed at last year at ASIST meeting, ISO standards are not free! Thanks to your work! marcia ________________________________ From: Asis-standards on behalf of Mark Needleman Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 1:53:16 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes Folks I just cast the following votes: REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier Comments: ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon Mark -------------- next part -------------- So the first two will be reviewed, right? Good. The last one is not clear. So we agree with the withdraw of Z39.84, is this the vote? Last, Good idea to have NISO standard being kept even the ISO one is there. As you said, and we discussed at last year at ASIST meeting, ISO standards are not free! Thanks to your work! marcia _________________________________________________________________ From: Asis-standards on behalf of Mark Needleman Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 1:53:16 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes Folks I just cast the following votes: REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier Comments: ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Mon Feb 6 14:21:13 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes In-Reply-To: References: <92DD6669-CE32-479C-9ECD-17AFE3C634E8@yahoo.com> Message-ID: The 1st two will not be reviewed just remain as NISO standards for the next 5 years when there will be a vote to evaluate wether they are still valid NISO recommended that since there is an International version of the DOI syntax standard - the US national version be withdrawn - even NLM and NFAIS who submitted those comments agreed with the decision If the US DOI syntax standard is withdrawn there is no guarantee that he ISO one will become free unfortunately - which is why I included that comment about Z39.50 Mark > On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:09 PM, ZENG, MARCIA wrote: > > So the first two will be reviewed, right? Good. > The last one is not clear. So we agree with the withdraw of Z39.84, is this the vote? > Last, Good idea to have NISO standard being kept even the ISO one is there. As you said, and we discussed at last year at ASIST meeting, ISO standards are not free! > > Thanks to your work! > marcia > From: Asis-standards on behalf of Mark Needleman > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 1:53:16 PM > To: ASIST Standards Committee > Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes > > Folks > > I just cast the following votes: > > REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images > > REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry > > WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier > > Comments: > > > ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard > > Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon > > Mark -------------- next part -------------- The 1st two will not be reviewed just remain as NISO standards for the next 5 years when there will be a vote to evaluate wether they are still valid NISO recommended that since there is an International version of the DOI syntax standard - the US national version be withdrawn - even NLM and NFAIS who submitted those comments agreed with the decision If the US DOI syntax standard is withdrawn there is no guarantee that he ISO one will become free unfortunately - which is why I included that comment about Z39.50 Mark On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:09 PM, ZENG, MARCIA <[1]mzeng at kent.edu> wrote: So the first two will be reviewed, right? Good. The last one is not clear. So we agree with the withdraw of Z39.84, is this the vote? Last, Good idea to have NISO standard being kept even the ISO one is there. As you said, and we discussed at last year at ASIST meeting, ISO standards are not free! Thanks to your work! marcia _________________________________________________________________ From: Asis-standards <[2]asis-standards-bounces at asis.org> on behalf of Mark Needleman <[3]needleman_mark at yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 1:53:16 PM To: ASIST Standards Committee Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO votes Folks I just cast the following votes: REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.87-2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images REAFFIRM on Review of ANSI/NISO Z39.43-1993 (R2011) Standard Address Number (SAN) for the Publishing Industry WITHDRAW with comments on Review of / Withdraw ANSI/NISO Z39.84-2005 (R2010) Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier Comments: ASIST concurs with the comments of NLM and NFAIS about making sure that ISO standards are available and affordable and notes that NISO continues to maintain Z39.50 as a US National Standard even though there is an equivalent ISO version ISO3950 - If we recall correctly one of the major reasons for doing this was concern over the availability and affordability of ISO standards. With Z39.50 there was also the concern with the slow pace and cumbersome process of making changes to ISO standards and felt having that flexibility justified the maintenance of a US standard Ill be sending out a few more upcoming votes soon Mark References 1. mailto:mzeng at kent.edu 2. mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org 3. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Feb 7 13:23:27 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" References: <20170207150805.7CFCD175844F@list.niso.org> Message-ID: <30C2E45E-7D4A-4D9C-A391-4B22E22DDF41@yahoo.com> Anyone have any problem with this? Mark > Begin forwarded message: > > From: > Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" > Date: February 7, 2017 at 10:08:05 AM EST > To: needleman_mark at yahoo.com > > "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" has opened. > Ballot Title: SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA > > Question > Do you approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA for a 3-year term? > > Closing Date: Friday, 3 March 2017 @ 11:59 pm EST > > Description > Following last 2-3 February meeting of the ISO 3166/MA, Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis from ICANN has been nominated as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term. > > > > According to subclause 4.4.1 of the Terms of reference for the maintenance of ISO 3166, reproduced below, ISO TC 46 needs to approve this nomination via a one-month CIB ballot. > > > > 4.4.1 > > The ISO 3166/MAS in coordination with the ISO/TC 46 Secretariat shall nominate a permanent Chair and Vicechair to be the officers of the ISO 3166/MA. These two officers shall be representatives of the two > > different membership groups > > ? one from the ISO P-members; > > ? one from the (non-ISO) International Organizations. > > > > Your voting options are: > > Yes - approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term (comments optional) > > No - do not approve approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term (comments required) > > Abstain from voting (comments optional) > > Vote > Yes > No > Abstain > Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group > Date Opened: Tuesday, 7 February 2017 @ 6:00 am EST > Referenced Items > N938, ISO-TC046_Consultation on ISO 3166_MA Vice-chair.pdf (177K) 2017-02-07 Download | View Details -------------- next part -------------- Anyone have any problem with this? Mark Begin forwarded message: From: <[1]admin at list.niso.org> Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" Date: February 7, 2017 at 10:08:05 AM EST To: [2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" has opened. Ballot Title: [3]SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA _________________________________________________________________ Question Do you approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA for a 3-year term? Closing Date: Friday, 3 March 2017 @ 11:59 pm EST Description Following last 2-3 February meeting of the ISO 3166/MA, Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis from ICANN has been nominated as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term. According to subclause 4.4.1 of the Terms of reference for the maintenance of ISO 3166, reproduced below, ISO TC 46 needs to approve this nomination via a one-month CIB ballot. 4.4.1 The ISO 3166/MAS in coordination with the ISO/TC 46 Secretariat shall nominate a permanent Chair and Vicechair to be the officers of the ISO 3166/MA. These two officers shall be representatives of the two different membership groups ? one from the ISO P-members; ? one from the (non-ISO) International Organizations. Your voting options are: Yes - approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term (comments optional) No - do not approve approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term (comments required) Abstain from voting (comments optional) [4]Vote * Yes * No * Abstain _________________________________________________________________ Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group Date Opened: Tuesday, 7 February 2017 @ 6:00 am EST _________________________________________________________________ Referenced Items N938, ISO-TC046_Consultation on ISO 3166_MA Vice-chair.pdf (177K) 2017-02-07 [5]Download | [6]View Details References 1. mailto:admin at list.niso.org 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=764 4. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=764 5. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/download.php/17507 6. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/document.php?document_id=17507 From mhlava at accessinn.com Tue Feb 7 13:35:47 2017 From: mhlava at accessinn.com (margie_hlava) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:35:47 -0700 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" In-Reply-To: <30C2E45E-7D4A-4D9C-A391-4B22E22DDF41@yahoo.com> References: <20170207150805.7CFCD175844F@list.niso.org> <30C2E45E-7D4A-4D9C-A391-4B22E22DDF41@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3902C9C2-54F2-4BA1-B535-D54A9AC2DB7C@accessinn.com> I vote yes Marjorie Hlava Mhlava at accessinn.com Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Mark Needleman wrote: > > > Anyone have any problem with this? > > Mark > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: <[1]admin at list.niso.org> > > Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Groups - Ballot opened: "SHORT TURN-AROUND > BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO > 3166/MA" > > Date: February 7, 2017 at 10:08:05 AM EST > > To: [2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com > > "SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of > Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA" has opened. > Ballot Title: [3]SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on > nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA > _________________________________________________________________ > > Question > Do you approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA for a 3-year > term? > Closing Date: Friday, 3 March 2017 @ 11:59 pm EST > Description > Following last 2-3 February meeting of the ISO 3166/MA, Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis > from ICANN has been nominated as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term. > According to subclause 4.4.1 of the Terms of reference for the maintenance > of ISO 3166, reproduced below, ISO TC 46 needs to approve this nomination > via a one-month CIB ballot. > 4.4.1 > The ISO 3166/MAS in coordination with the ISO/TC 46 Secretariat shall > nominate a permanent Chair and Vicechair to be the officers of the ISO > 3166/MA. These two officers shall be representatives of the two > different membership groups > ? one from the ISO P-members; > ? one from the (non-ISO) International Organizations. > Your voting options are: > Yes - approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a 3-year term > (comments optional) > No - do not approve approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of the MA for a > 3-year term (comments required) > Abstain from voting (comments optional) > [4]Vote > * Yes > * No > * Abstain > _________________________________________________________________ > > Group: TC46 Ballot Advisory Group > Date Opened: Tuesday, 7 February 2017 @ 6:00 am EST > _________________________________________________________________ > > Referenced Items > N938, ISO-TC046_Consultation on ISO 3166_MA Vice-chair.pdf (177K) 2017-02-07 > [5]Download | [6]View Details > > References > > 1. mailto:admin at list.niso.org > 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com > 3. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=764 > 4. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/ballot.php?id=764 > 5. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/download.php/17507 > 6. http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46ballots/document.php?document_id=17507 > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Sat Feb 11 19:05:45 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Some votes due at. The beginning of March Message-ID: <32355461-8D28-433A-A071-8586A487DB5C@yahoo.com> A couple of votes due 3/1/2017 - Please pay special attention to #3 - relevant documents attached Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 30301:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records ? Requirements Do you recommend that ISO 30301:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Requirements be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This International Standard specifies requirements to be met by a MSR in order to support an organization in the achievement of its mandate, mission, strategy and goals. It addresses the development and implementation of a records policy and objectives and gives information on measuring and monitoring performance. A MSR can be established by an organization or across organizations that share business activities. Throughout this International Standard, the term ?organization? is not limited to one organization but also includes other organizational structures. This International Standard is applicable to any organization that wishes to: a) establish, implement, maintain and improve a MSR to support its business; b) assure itself of conformity with its stated records policy; c) demonstrate conformity with this International Standard by 1) undertaking a self-assessment and self-declaration, or 2) seeking confirmation of its self-declaration by a party external to the organization, or 3) seeking certification of its MSR by an external party. This International Standard can be implemented with other Management System Standards (MSS). It is especially useful to demonstrate compliance with the documentation and records requirements of other MSS. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Due 3/1/2017 2) Systematic Review of ISO 30300:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Fundamentals and vocabulary Do you recommend that ISO 30300:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Fundamentals and vocabulary be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This International Standard defines terms and definitions applicable to the standards on MSR prepared by ISO/TC 46/SC 11. It also establishes the objectives for using a MSR, provides principles for a MSR, describes a process approach and specifies roles for top management. This International Standard is applicable to any type of organization that wishes to: a) establish, implement, maintain and improve a MSR to support its business; b) assure itself of conformity with its stated records policy; c) demonstrate conformity with this International Standard by 1) undertaking a self-assessment and self-declaration, or 2) seeking confirmation of its self-declaration by a party external to the organization, or 3) seeking certification of its MSR by an external party. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Due 3/1/2017 3) N924, ISO TC 46/SC 9 ISO WD 20247, Information and documentation ? International library item identifier (ILII) Do you approve the draft for publication? This international standard specifies the International Library Item Identifier (ILII) which is used for the unique identification of items held by libraries and related organizations. Library and related organization here refers to an organization within the scope of ISO 15511, Information and documentation ? International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL). Items here refer to materials identified and managed by a concerned organization. Digital objects to which the organization holds only access rights (e.g., electronic journals) are excluded from the definition of items in this context. The purpose of ILII is to facilitate unique identification of library items when information about them is shared among library applications. Examples of such system(s) include interlibrary loan and shared print agreements. Due 3/8/2017 \ -------------- next part -------------- A couple of votes due 3/1/2017 - Please pay special attention to #3 - relevant documents attached Mark 1) Systematic Review of ISO 30301:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records ? Requirements Do you recommend that ISO 30301:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Requirements be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This International Standard specifies requirements to be met by a MSR in order to support an organization in the achievement of its mandate, mission, strategy and goals. It addresses the development and implementation of a records policy and objectives and gives information on measuring and monitoring performance. A MSR can be established by an organization or across organizations that share business activities. Throughout this International Standard, the term ?organization? is not limited to one organization but also includes other organizational structures. This International Standard is applicable to any organization that wishes to: a) establish, implement, maintain and improve a MSR to support its business; b) assure itself of conformity with its stated records policy; c) demonstrate conformity with this International Standard by 1) undertaking a self-assessment and self-declaration, or 2) seeking confirmation of its self-declaration by a party external to the organization, or 3) seeking certification of its MSR by an external party. This International Standard can be implemented with other Management System Standards (MSS). It is especially useful to demonstrate compliance with the documentation and records requirements of other MSS. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Due 3/1/2017 2) Systematic Review of ISO 30300:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Fundamentals and vocabulary Do you recommend that ISO 30300:2011, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Fundamentals and vocabulary be confirmed, revised, or withdrawn? This International Standard defines terms and definitions applicable to the standards on MSR prepared by ISO/TC 46/SC 11. It also establishes the objectives for using a MSR, provides principles for a MSR, describes a process approach and specifies roles for top management. This International Standard is applicable to any type of organization that wishes to: a) establish, implement, maintain and improve a MSR to support its business; b) assure itself of conformity with its stated records policy; c) demonstrate conformity with this International Standard by 1) undertaking a self-assessment and self-declaration, or 2) seeking confirmation of its self-declaration by a party external to the organization, or 3) seeking certification of its MSR by an external party. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Due 3/1/2017 3) N924, ISO TC 46/SC 9 ISO WD 20247, Information and documentation ? International library item identifier (ILII) Do you approve the draft for publication? This international standard specifies the International Library Item Identifier (ILII) which is used for the unique identification of items held by libraries and related organizations. Library and related organization here refers to an organization within the scope of ISO 15511, Information and documentation ? International standard identifier for libraries and related organizations (ISIL). Items here refer to materials identified and managed by a concerned organization. Digital objects to which the organization holds only access rights (e.g., electronic journals) are excluded from the definition of items in this context. The purpose of ILII is to facilitate unique identification of library items when information about them is shared among library applications. Examples of such system(s) include interlibrary loan and shared print agreements. Due 3/8/2017 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 30301-2011, Information and documentation -- Management system for records -- Requirements.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 828844 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO TC 46_SC 11 ISO 30300, Information and documentation -- Management systems for records -- Fundamentals and vocabulary.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1681451 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N924, ISO TC 46_SC 9 ISO WD?20247, Information and documentation?? International library item identifier (ILII).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 111009 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- \ From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Sun Feb 12 13:56:29 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: <254790B9-8633-4A7A-B58D-4C9026E4B12E@yahoo.com> Folks I just voted YES on SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA Ballot Question Do you approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA for a 3-year term? Mark -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just voted YES on SHORT TURN-AROUND BALLOT: ISO TC 46 CIB Consultation on nomination of Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA Ballot Question Do you approve Mr. Jaap Akkerhuis as Vice-chair of ISO 3166/MA for a 3-year term? Mark From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Thu Feb 16 16:07:28 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] Fwd: NISO Announces Updated Version of ResourceSync Framework Specification References: <1127226250486.1121387823279.1917486566.0.251603JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> Message-ID: <4F4775DE-FB89-460F-8D36-408BBEEBC234@yahoo.com> FYI Mark > Begin forwarded message: > > From: NISO > Subject: NISO Announces Updated Version of ResourceSync Framework Specification > Date: February 16, 2017 at 4:03:30 PM EST > To: needleman_mark at yahoo.com > Reply-To: nisohq at niso.org > > > > > For Immediate Release > > > > > > NISO Announces Updated Version of ResourceSync Framework Specification > > Baltimore, MD - February 16, 2017 - The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) is pleased to announce the formal publication of an updated version of the ResourceSync Framework Specification (ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017) . Approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), this 1.1 revision improves a web standard that details various capabilities that a server can implement to allow third-party systems to remain synchronized with evolving resources. Such synchronization is important in the current landscape where Web-based content--not only the metadata about the content--is constantly changing. > > ResourceSync was first published as ANSI/NISO Z39.99 in 2014. The standard, also known as the ResourceSync "core" specification, offers a range of easy-to-implement capabilities that a server may support in order to enable remote systems to remain more tightly in step with its evolving resources. It also describes how a server should advertise the facilities it supports, and presents plentiful examples and use cases that offer guidance for implementation. The recent revisions to the standard, which is pull-based, reflect changes to fix problems related to the conflation of last modification date of a resource and the datetime of notification of a change to the resource. > > "Web resources and collections of web resources are continually evolving and, in many cases, applications that want to leverage these resources need to be confident that the data they use is the most up-to-date available," says Herbert Van de Sompel, Scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory, OAI Executive, and Co-chair of the ResourceSync Working Group. "Our revision to the ResourceSync core specification strengthens a standard that addresses a core need for resource discovery and synchronization across different systems in domains such as scholarly communication, cultural heritage, and education. ResourceSync is very modular in design and is based on the HTTP and Sitemap protocols to ensure easy uptake in many applications, including--but not limited to--timely sharing of data from different types of repositories. Also, associated optional specifications provide extensions to the ANSI/NISO ResourceSync core. These include specifications to support archives of synchronization information and push-based change notification." > > "One of NISO's core functions is keeping our standards reliable and up to date," explains NISO Executive Director Todd Carpenter. "We're grateful to the ResourceSync working group whose efforts make this publication more valuable to those whose work relies on seamless updating of information. NISO also strives to create guidelines that are adaptable at various levels and for various needs. ResourceSync's modular capabilities can be customized for specific local or community requirements, making them useful for the range of institutions that use our standards." > > The ResourceSync specification and video tutorials on using the ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017 standard are available on the NISO website at www.niso.org/workrooms/resourcesync/ . > About NISO > NISO, based in Baltimore, Maryland, fosters the development and maintenance of standards that facilitate the creation, persistent management, and effective interchange of information so that it can be trusted for use in research and learning. To fulfill this mission, NISO engages libraries, publishers, information aggregators, and other organizations that support learning, research, and scholarship through the creation, organization, management, and curation of knowledge. NISO works with intersecting communities of interest and across the entire lifecycle of information standards. NISO is a not-for-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For more information, visit the NISO website . > > About OAI > > The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) develops and promotes interoperability standards that aim to facilitate the efficient dissemination of content. The Open Archives Initiative has its roots in an effort to enhance access to e-print archives as a means of increasing the availability of scholarly communication. Continued support of this work remains a cornerstone of the Open Archives program. OAI is committed to exploring and enabling the fundamental technological framework and standards to open up access to a range of digital materials. > NISO | (301) 654-2512 | nisohq at niso.org | www.niso.org > NISO > 3600 Clipper Mill Road > Suite 302 > Baltimore MD 21211 > SafeUnsubscribe??needleman_mark at yahoo.com > Update Profile > About our service provider > Sent by nisohq at niso.org in collaboration with > > Try it free today -------------- next part -------------- FYI Mark Begin forwarded message: From: NISO <[1]nisohq at niso.org> Subject: NISO Announces Updated Version of ResourceSync Framework Specification Date: February 16, 2017 at 4:03:30 PM EST To: [2]needleman_mark at yahoo.com Reply-To: [3]nisohq at niso.org [s.gif] For Immediate Release [10ff106c-f556-4314-9d18-0ec851ae3a1a.png] NISO Announces Updated Version of ResourceSync Framework Specification Baltimore, MD - February 16, 2017 - The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) is pleased to announce the formal publication of an updated version of the [4]ResourceSync Framework Specification (ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017). Approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), this 1.1 revision improves a web standard that details various capabilities that a server can implement to allow third-party systems to remain synchronized with evolving resources. Such synchronization is important in the current landscape where Web-based content--not only the metadata about the content--is constantly changing. ResourceSync was first published as ANSI/NISO Z39.99 in 2014. The standard, also known as the ResourceSync "core" specification, offers a range of easy-to-implement capabilities that a server may support in order to enable remote systems to remain more tightly in step with its evolving resources. It also describes how a server should advertise the facilities it supports, and presents plentiful examples and use cases that offer guidance for implementation. The recent revisions to the standard, which is pull-based, reflect changes to fix problems related to the conflation of last modification date of a resource and the datetime of notification of a change to the resource. "Web resources and collections of web resources are continually evolving and, in many cases, applications that want to leverage these resources need to be confident that the data they use is the most up-to-date available," says Herbert Van de Sompel, Scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory, OAI Executive, and Co-chair of the ResourceSync Working Group. "Our revision to the ResourceSync core specification strengthens a standard that addresses a core need for resource discovery and synchronization across different systems in domains such as scholarly communication, cultural heritage, and education. ResourceSync is very modular in design and is based on the HTTP and Sitemap protocols to ensure easy uptake in many applications, including--but not limited to--timely sharing of data from different types of repositories. Also, associated optional specifications provide extensions to the ANSI/NISO ResourceSync core. These include specifications to support archives of synchronization information and push-based change notification." "One of NISO's core functions is keeping our standards reliable and up to date," explains NISO Executive Director Todd Carpenter. "We're grateful to the ResourceSync working group whose efforts make this publication more valuable to those whose work relies on seamless updating of information. NISO also strives to create guidelines that are adaptable at various levels and for various needs. ResourceSync's modular capabilities can be customized for specific local or community requirements, making them useful for the range of institutions that use our standards." The ResourceSync specification and video tutorials on using the ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017 standard are available on the NISO website at [5]www.niso.org/workrooms/resourcesync/. About NISO NISO, based in Baltimore, Maryland, fosters the development and maintenance of standards that facilitate the creation, persistent management, and effective interchange of information so that it can be trusted for use in research and learning. To fulfill this mission, NISO engages libraries, publishers, information aggregators, and other organizations that support learning, research, and scholarship through the creation, organization, management, and curation of knowledge. NISO works with intersecting communities of interest and across the entire lifecycle of information standards. NISO is a not-for-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For more information, visit the [6]NISO website. About OAI The [7]Open Archives Initiative (OAI) develops and promotes interoperability standards that aim to facilitate the efficient dissemination of content. The Open Archives Initiative has its roots in an effort to enhance access to e-print archives as a means of increasing the availability of scholarly communication. Continued support of this work remains a cornerstone of the Open Archives program. OAI is committed to exploring and enabling the fundamental technological framework and standards to open up access to a range of digital materials. NISO | (301) 654-2512 | [8]nisohq at niso.org | [9]www.niso.org NISO3600 Clipper Mill RoadSuite 302 Baltimore MD 21211 [10]SafeUnsubscribe? needleman_mark at yahoo.com [11]Update Profile[12]About our service provider Sent by [13]nisohq at niso.org in collaboration with [14]Constant Contact [15]Try it free today References Visible links 1. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 2. mailto:needleman_mark at yahoo.com 3. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 4. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVb68Lp7vNfSJDu4VKVwKXdDD99h7RbP0ZxgDqICRQwrxf0Kd6jsWOIRmGE8ELG7k9wtdH_JjFf3Q1VygE9Y6bJYDm9gOtaQhm7KXhIAqU5GikbDLm3DoYRaQkAeXBCRPiHCpFsihOhteMWqxEzEXmCM=&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== 5. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVSjNmARW2JROjGQAvLIVWarcpa3dFb_eLV1cmM4mXAKX8IAWfb87kE9wvkiFQHZzA07ONPtDS00F6uwXE9PawFPOzVfRQB13Bu9zIbq-Wivu092qn1Of-wMFTo7raULFbb0crdd4EW_RBmNnZefUsdI=&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== 6. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVaCd0ElnkDXhx2B9KVVTVHDUUm62yiaaCDneeLIGmP6UrK2hIoJpgBFpsn0Wym7JoQSzTSoMdHZLgJFw5Mwjknq9x5D_TVjqCbO5beF3ZeNO&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== 7. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVb68Lp7vNfSJ-10KTeRKk-LZ5LABDm3EGwPxDqnzl1TktXXkxAuxKS--LNlV7lR9us1bIW6s42QPscUH8rdJ8JzTi3j2cJLM-Z1cKp_CHMNPcJzMIgrUcdwDSHF0OBGnUg==&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== 8. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 9. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVaCd0ElnkDXhx2B9KVVTVHDUUm62yiaaCDneeLIGmP6UrK2hIoJpgBFpsn0Wym7JoQSzTSoMdHZLgJFw5Mwjknq9x5D_TVjqCbO5beF3ZeNO&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== 10. https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=001vxR5oH7oJeHq5TUcqRW79g%3D%3D&ch=947f7fa0-9a90-11e5-a61e-d4ae52733bf0&ca=eb967ca8-a1dc-48a0-81cc-50fa4b3e0109 11. https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=001vxR5oH7oJeHq5TUcqRW79g%3D%3D&ch=947f7fa0-9a90-11e5-a61e-d4ae52733bf0&ca=eb967ca8-a1dc-48a0-81cc-50fa4b3e0109 12. http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-provider 13. mailto:nisohq at niso.org 14. http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=PT1142 15. http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=PT1142 Hidden links: 16. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ODa8CsG9y4eY5QWAOP36jrMF0H2VMo5ogmcb9XvQqbUgTJ70JP8QVaCd0ElnkDXhx2B9KVVTVHDUUm62yiaaCDneeLIGmP6UrK2hIoJpgBFpsn0Wym7JoQSzTSoMdHZLgJFw5Mwjknq9x5D_TVjqCbO5beF3ZeNO&c=jLYewpZP6EaL2I2mqHPT9LX5RczKnEzcOhyrdOOjhDhSTHBU3cJz6g==&ch=evfB0HMp1txUUzersVbn9iNUSre-RX5G3J2fXNIJ76ZXMfIt-T8D3Q== From needleman_mark at yahoo.com Tue Feb 28 15:05:01 2017 From: needleman_mark at yahoo.com (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Message-ID: <21CF6C61-F55E-44FD-8005-1F294F83115A@yahoo.com> Folks I just cast the following votes Mark Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 15919:2001 (vers 3) -- Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 233-2:1993 (vers 5) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Arabic language -- Simplified transliteration Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 233:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 259-2:1994 (vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Simplified transliteration Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 259:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 9985:1996 (vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Armenian characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 9:1995 (Ed 2, vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Cyrillic characters into Latin characters -- Slavic and non-Slavic languages -------------- next part -------------- Folks I just cast the following votes Mark Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 15919:2001 (vers 3) -- Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 233-2:1993 (vers 5) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Arabic language -- Simplified transliteration Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 233:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 259-2:1994 (vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters -- Part 2: Simplified transliteration Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 259:1984 (vers 4) Documentation -- Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 9985:1996 (vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Armenian characters into Latin characters Voted CONFIRM on Systematic Review of ISO 9:1995 (Ed 2, vers 3) Information and documentation -- Transliteration of Cyrillic characters into Latin characters -- Slavic and non-Slavic languages