[Asis-standards] 2016 votes (3)
Mark Needleman
needleman_mark at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 13 13:44:48 EDT 2016
>
>
> The last note (for now)
>
> Mark
>
> 1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9 standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval
>
> This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia collections, and the items within them.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for the import and export of thesaurus data.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual thesauri.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be useful for that purpose.
>
> This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories:
>
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you)
>
> 2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange
>
> This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange
>
> This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records.
>
> It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these specifications being the functions of an implementation format.
>
> This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework designed specially for communications between data processing systems and not for use as a processing format within systems.
>
> ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
>
> One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
> 1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
>
> 2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or was it modified?
>
> 3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it applied or used in your country without national adoption or are products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
>
> 4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in regulations in your country?
>
> 5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name and e-mail address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
> Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
> Withdraw [comments required]
> Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
> Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting} [comments optional]
>
> Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case the decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons agreement if its not you)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
The last note (for now)
Mark
1) Systematic Review of ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation --
Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for
information retrieval
This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC9
standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Information and documentation -- Thesauri and
interoperability with other vocabularies -- Part 1: Thesauri for information
retrieval
This part of ISO 25964 gives recommendations for the development and
maintenance of thesauri intended for information retrieval applications. It
is applicable to vocabularies used for retrieving information from all types
of information resources, irrespective of the media used (text, sound, still
or moving image, physical object or multimedia) including knowledge bases
and portals, bibliographic databases, text, museum or multimedia
collections, and the items within them.
This part of ISO 25964 also provides a data model and recommended format for
the import and export of thesaurus data.
This part of ISO 25964 is applicable to monolingual and multilingual
thesauri.
This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the preparation of
back-of-the-book indexes, although many of its recommendations could be
useful for that purpose.
This part of ISO 25964 is not applicable to the databases or software used
directly in search or indexing applications, but does anticipate the needs
of such applications among its recommendations for thesaurus management.
***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
was it modified?
3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
regulations in your country?
5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to
participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to
nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your
comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when
adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name and e-mail address,
a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder
Categories:
Industry and Commerce
Government
Consumers
Labour
Academic and Research Bodies
Standards Application
Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
Withdraw [comments required]
Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/29/2016 - in case the
decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know
someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons
agreement if its not you)
2) Systematic Review of ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format
for information exchange
This is a ballot for the five-year of systematic review of the TC46/SC4
standard ISO 2709:2008 - Information and documentation -- Format for
information exchange
This International Standard specifies the requirements for a generalized
exchange format which will hold records describing all forms of material
capable of bibliographic description as well as other types of records.
It does not define the length or the content of individual records and does
not assign any meaning to tags, indicators or identifiers, these
specifications being the functions of an implementation format.
This International Standard describes a generalized structure, a framework
designed specially for communications between data processing systems and
not for use as a processing format within systems.
***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments.
If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of
this standard, please indicate which one in your comments.
One person can respond to the following questions to accompany your vote:
1. Has this International Standard been adopted or is it intended to be
adopted in the future as a national standard or other publication?
2. Is the national publication identical to the International Standard or
was it modified?
3. If this International Standard has not been nationally adopted, is it
applied or used in your country without national adoption or are
products/processes/services used in your country based on this standard?
4. Is this International Standard, or its national adoption, referenced in
regulations in your country?
5. In case the committee decides to Revise/Amend, will/are you committed to
participate actively in the development of the project? If you would like to
nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your
comments, we are now also required to provide particular information when
adding Experts to working groups: The Expert’s full name and e-mail address,
a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following Stakeholder
Categories:
Industry and Commerce
Government
Consumers
Labour
Academic and Research Bodies
Standards Application
Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
Your voting options are:
Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional]
Revise/Amend [comments required with experts nominated]
Withdraw [comments required]
Abstain due to lack of consensus (from voting) [comments optional]
Abstain due to lack of access to national expert input {from voting}
[comments optional]
Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 11/30/2016 - in case the
decision is made to revise and you want to be on the working group or know
someone who would make a good member get me contact details (and the persons
agreement if its not you)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ISO 2709;2008(E)-Character PDF document.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 718056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20160913/8ab22721/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ISO 25964-1;2011(E)-Character PDF document .pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 7324406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.asis.org/pipermail/asis-standards/attachments/20160913/8ab22721/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
More information about the Asis-standards
mailing list