[Asis-standards] ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision

[Mark Needleman]

Marjorie

except they didn’t ask for a vote - only comments

mark
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Marjorie Hlava <mhlava at accessinn.com> wrote:
> 
> still looks like  a NO vote is the right one to do-  I still believe this will cause the “standard” to be implemented differently in different countries and therefore no longer be  a standard
> 
> 
> Marjorie Hlava
> mhlava at accessinn.com <mailto:mhlava at accessinn.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Gregory Grazevich <ggrazevich at mla.org <mailto:ggrazevich at mla.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> FYI, Margie's comment on the initial ballot was:
>> 
>> I have voted Yes - but it is really a NO Vote.  My comments as follows 
>> 
>> This is a confusing vote.  Are we voting against the change or voting to put the ballot forward? Or does the vote not matter and this is just a vehicle to collect comments?
>> 
>> I don't think it a minor revision but a change in direction for the ISSN, perhaps implemented by country maintenance agency creating a patchwork of compliance and a danger to the long time worth of the standard.  
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Modifier's message
>>> This ballot was stated incorrectly based on the information given. If you agree with the amendment then vote "yes" If you DO NOT agree with the amendment then vote "no" with your comment. Should you need assistance in changing your vote please don't hesitate to contact me at dparks at niso.org <mailto:dparks at niso.org> 
>>> -- DeVonne Parks
>>> DeVonne Parks modified the ballot ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision
> 
> Marjorie Hlava
> mhlava at accessinn.com <mailto:mhlava at accessinn.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------

   Marjorie

   except they didn’t ask for a vote - only comments

   mark

   On Mar 16, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Marjorie Hlava <[1]mhlava at accessinn.com>
   wrote:

   still looks like  a NO vote is the right one to do-  I still believe this
   will  cause  the “standard” to be implemented differently in different
   countries and therefore no longer be  a standard
   Marjorie Hlava
   [2]mhlava at accessinn.com

   On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Gregory Grazevich <[3]ggrazevich at mla.org>
   wrote:

   FYI, Margie's comment on the initial ballot was:

   I have voted Yes - but it is really a NO Vote.  My comments as follows 
   This is a confusing vote.  Are we voting against the change or voting to put
   the ballot forward? Or does the vote not matter and this is just a vehicle
   to collect comments?
   I don't think it a minor revision but a change in direction for the ISSN,
   perhaps implemented by country maintenance agency creating a patchwork of
   compliance and a danger to the long time worth of the standard.  

   ____________________________________________________________________________

     Modifier's message
     This ballot was stated incorrectly based on the information given. If you
     agree with the amendment then vote "yes" If you DO NOT agree with the
     amendment then vote "no" with your comment. Should you need assistance in
     changing   your   vote   please   don't   hesitate  to  contact  me
     at [4]dparks at niso.org
     -- DeVonne Parks
     DeVonne Parks modified the ballot ISO 3297-2007-ISSN Revision

   Marjorie Hlava
   [5]mhlava at accessinn.com

References

   1. mailto:mhlava at accessinn.com
   2. mailto:mhlava at accessinn.com
   3. mailto:ggrazevich at mla.org
   4. mailto:dparks at niso.org
   5. mailto:mhlava at accessinn.com