From MNeedleman at flvc.org Mon May 4 07:07:48 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 11:07:48 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO Work Item Message-ID: Does anyone have a problem with ( or think this is uncessary) New work item proposal: Transliteration of Thai-Tham- Isan and Thai-Noi There is already a standard on the Transliteration of Thai (ISO 11940). This proposal is to develop a separate standard specific to the Romanized transliteration of the characters used in Thai-Tham-Isan and Thai-Noi Languages along with orthographic features utilizing an electronic coding system for computerization. The complete new work item proposal is available from the ballot webpage and the link in the announcement email. Also included is a working draft of the proposed standard, which you are encouraged to comment on. If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name at least one expert who will work on this standard's development. If you would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in your comments. Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project. We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote yes or no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your Affirmative or Negative vote. Consider whether you think this standard will be used in the U.S. Your voting options are: YES - approve this as a new project (comments required on justification statement; nominate expert(s) if you have one; comments on the working draft are encouraged but optional) NO - do not approve this as a new project (comments required on why) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comment an a vote recommendation needed by 5/26 - I have attached the relevant documents to this note mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N2515_NWIP_Transliteration_of_Thai Tham Isan_and_Thai-Noi.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 289728 bytes Desc: N2515_NWIP_Transliteration_of_Thai Tham Isan_and_Thai-Noi.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N2516_NWIP_on_Transliteration_of_Thai Tham Isan_an.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 7349113 bytes Desc: N2516_NWIP_on_Transliteration_of_Thai Tham Isan_an.pdf URL: From MNeedleman at flvc.org Mon May 11 12:02:29 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:02:29 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] FW: [NISO tc46ballots] Call for expert: TC46/SC4 NWIP Data Exchange Protocol for Interoperability and Preservation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: FYI - in case anyone is interested (or knows of someone who might be interested) in serving on this I have attached the document referred to in the URL below to this note mark From: tc46ballots at list.niso.org [mailto:tc46ballots at list.niso.org] On Behalf Of DeVonne Parks Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:53 AM To: tc46ballots at list.niso.org Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Call for expert: TC46/SC4 NWIP Data Exchange Protocol for Interoperability and Preservation To members of the U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for ISO TC46 We received sufficient votes to send in a U.S. vote of Approve on the TC46/SC4 new work item proposal, Information and documentation - International standard document link. If we send in a Yes vote, we are expected to nominate someone to work on this project. We did not receive any names as part of the ballot. So at this time, I am asking if there is anyone who is interested in and has some expertise to work on this project - or could nominate someone in your organization. ISO working groups do their work with conference calls and email. Some working groups hold occasional face-to-face meetings, but attendance in those is not required. The proposal for the project is available here after logging in to the NISO website: http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46sc4interest/download.php/14432 Please get back to me as soon as possible with any nominations. Please provide names, contact info and a brief description (paragraph at most) of the individual's related background to the project. Thanks DeVonne Parks Member Services & Engagement Manager National Information Standards Organization (NISO) 3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 302 Baltimore, MD 21211 E-mail: dparks at niso.org URL: www.niso.org Direct: +1.301.960.8261 Office: +1.301.654.2512 ext. 104 F: +410.685.5278 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N954 NWIP_DEPIP -expert-call.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1644050 bytes Desc: N954 NWIP_DEPIP -expert-call.pdf URL: From MNeedleman at flvc.org Thu May 21 08:09:50 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:09:50 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: Folks I just voted AFFIRMATIVE on Approval of ISO DTS 18344, Effectiveness of paper deacidification processes Thanks to Timothy Dickey for the vote recommendation mark From MNeedleman at flvc.org Tue May 26 07:11:07 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:11:07 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO vote Message-ID: Folks I just voted YES on (since noone had any objections) New work item proposal: Transliteration of Thai-Tham- Isan and Thai-Noi with the following comment ASIST agrees with the comments provided by NFAIS about the need for the new standard to be tied to the existing one There are a few more votes coming up which ill be sending out information on soon Mark From MNeedleman at flvc.org Tue May 26 07:27:07 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:27:07 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes Message-ID: Folks a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice) 1) Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation -- Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements, according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 2) Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange. This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of information among data processing systems and within message transmission systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 3) Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations. ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network environment to provide the information about collections, parties, activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in electronic form. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 Ive attached the relevant documents to this note Mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO 2146-2010.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 557783 bytes Desc: ISO 2146-2010.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_10754_1996(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 2384067 bytes Desc: ISO_10754_1996(E).pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_22310_2006(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 144996 bytes Desc: ISO_22310_2006(E).pdf URL: From thornbug at oclc.org Tue May 26 07:59:48 2015 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:59:48 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 1) Records management -do not see a reason to object 2) Cyrillic- checking on this with my colleagues 3) can't comment yet -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM To: 'asis-standards at asis.org' Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes Folks a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice) 1) Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation -- Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements, according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 2) Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange. This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of information among data processing systems and within message transmission systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 3) Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations. ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network environment to provide the information about collections, parties, activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in electronic form. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 Ive attached the relevant documents to this note Mark From thornbug at oclc.org Tue May 26 08:59:30 2015 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:59:30 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2) Cyrillic. From what I understand of this standard, if you're using Unicode you're not using 10754. However, investigation of the characters that were not able to be mapped is still needed, so I should think we would not want to vote against anyway , that is , not vote to withdraw. Does that make sense? -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM To: 'asis-standards at asis.org' Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes Folks a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice) 1) Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation -- Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements, according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 2) Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange. This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of information among data processing systems and within message transmission systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 3) Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations. ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network environment to provide the information about collections, parties, activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in electronic form. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 Ive attached the relevant documents to this note Mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Tue May 26 09:15:48 2015 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark H Needleman) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00ec01d097b6$153d3800$3fb7a800$@ufl.edu> I think I understand - thanks mark -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Thornburg,Gail Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:00 AM To: Mark Needleman; 'asis-standards at asis.org' Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] New votes 2) Cyrillic. From what I understand of this standard, if you're using Unicode you're not using 10754. However, investigation of the characters that were not able to be mapped is still needed, so I should think we would not want to vote against anyway , that is , not vote to withdraw. Does that make sense? -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM To: 'asis-standards at asis.org' Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes Folks a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice) 1) Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation -- Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements, according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 2) Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange. This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of information among data processing systems and within message transmission systems. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 3) Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and related organizations. ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network environment to provide the information about collections, parties, activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in electronic form. ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. Your voting options are: Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 Ive attached the relevant documents to this note Mark _______________________________________________ Asis-standards mailing list Asis-standards at asis.org http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards From ghodge at iiaweb.com Tue May 26 09:14:57 2015 From: ghodge at iiaweb.com (Gail Hodge) Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Makes sense to me. -- Gail On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Thornburg,Gail wrote: > 2) Cyrillic. From what I understand of this standard, if you're using > Unicode you're not using 10754. However, investigation of the characters > that were not able to be mapped is still needed, so I should think we > would not want to vote against anyway , that is , not vote to withdraw. > Does that make sense? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf > Of Mark Needleman > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:27 AM > To: 'asis-standards at asis.org' > Subject: [Asis-standards] New votes > > Folks > > a few more ISO votes coming up (sorry for the short notice) > > > 1) Systematic Review of ISO 22310:2006, Information and documentation -- > Guidelines for standards drafters for stating records management ISO > 22310:2006 allows the appropriate incorporation of records requirements, > according to ISO 15489-1, ISO/TR 15489-2 and 23081-1, which are applicable > to all standards that require the creation and retention of records into > other standards. It also highlights the different elements that need to be > considered as components of a comprehensive records management framework. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. > If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of > this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > Your voting options are: > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from > voting) [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 > > 2) Systematic Review of ISO 10754:1996, Information and documentation -- > Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic > languages for bibliographic information interchange This is a ballot for > the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 10754:1996, > Information and documentation -- Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded > character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information > interchange. > > This standard specifies a set of 90 graphic characters containing > characters from the non-Slavic Cyrillic alphabets. Consists of a code table > and a legend with explanatory notes containing each graphic, its use and > its name. The character set is primarily intended for the interchange of > information among data processing systems and within message transmission > systems. > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. > If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of > this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > Your voting options are: > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from > voting) [comments optional] > > Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by May 31 > > 3) Systematic Review of ISO 2146:2010, Information and documentation -- > Registry services for libraries and related organizations This is a ballot > for the five-year systematic review of the TC46/SC4 standard ISO 2146:2010, > Information and documentation -- Registry services for libraries and > related organizations. > > ISO 2146:2010 establishes the rules for registries operating in a network > environment to provide the information about collections, parties, > activities and services needed by libraries and related organizations to > manage their collections and deliver information and documentation services > across a range of applications and domains. It presents a data element > directory that may be used as a framework for collecting the appropriate > data and sharing it with other registry services, providing access to > registry data through standard protocols whenever it is needed as part of > an automated business workflow, publishing registries in electronic or > print form and archiving registry data when the data exists only in > electronic form. > > > ***If you are using this standard, please note that in your vote comments. > If you are using a different standard/guideline for the intended purpose of > this standard, please indicate which one in your comments. > > Your voting options are: > Confirm (as is or with only editorial corrections) [comments optional] > Revise [comments required] Withdraw [comments required] Abstain (from > voting) [comments optional] Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed > by May 31 > > Ive attached the relevant documents to this note > > Mark > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards > -- Gail Hodge Information International Associates, Inc. Email: ghodge at iiaweb.com Phone: 865-742-5430 visit us at www.iiaweb.com **An ISO 9001:2008 and 20000:2011 Quality Certified Company** From MNeedleman at flvc.org Thu May 28 12:12:32 2015 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:12:32 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] FW: [NISO tc46ballots] Call for expert: TC46 NWIP: Transliteration of Thai-Tham- Isan and Thai-Noi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: anyone interested in participating in this (or know of someone)? mark From: tc46ballots at list.niso.org [mailto:tc46ballots at list.niso.org] On Behalf Of DeVonne Parks Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:00 PM To: tc46ballots at list.niso.org Subject: [NISO tc46ballots] Call for expert: TC46 NWIP: Transliteration of Thai-Tham- Isan and Thai-Noi To members of the U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for ISO TC46 We received sufficient votes to send in a U.S. vote of Approve on the New work item proposal: Transliteration of Thai-Tham- Isan and Thai-Noi If we send in a Yes vote, we are expected to nominate someone to work on this project. We did not receive any names as part of the ballot. So at this time, I am asking if there is anyone who is interested in and has some expertise to work on this project - or could nominate someone in your organization. ISO working groups do their work with conference calls and email. Some working groups hold occasional face-to-face meetings, but attendance in those is not required. The proposal for the project is available here after logging in to the NISO website: http://www.niso.org/apps/org/workgroup/tc46interest/download.php/14527 Please get back to me as soon as possible with any nominations and provide names, contact info and a brief description (paragraph at most) of the individual's related background to the project. Thanks DeVonne Parks Member Services & Engagement Manager National Information Standards Organization (NISO)