[Asis-standards] new more votes

[TIMOTHY DICKEY]

Certainly an abstention here seems appropriate.
timothy


Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.

tdickey1 at kent.edu
(614) 785-1632


On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Mark Needleman <MNeedleman at flvc.org> wrote:

> that's cerainly the easy option - no comment required - I don't have a
> problem with that
>
> mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thornburg,Gail [mailto:thornbug at oclc.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 10:23 AM
> To: Mark Needleman; 'asis-standards at asis.org'
> Subject: RE: new more votes
>
> I think we should abstain
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf
> Of Mark Needleman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 10:05 AM
> To: 'asis-standards at asis.org'
> Subject: [Asis-standards] new more votes
>
> 2 more upcoming votes ( last ones in 2015)
>
> Personally I don't feel qualified to judge the usefullness of eith or these
>
> Also relevant document attached to this note ( there are 2 separate votes
> but the document applies t oboth so I only included 1 copy)
>
> mark
>
>
> 1)  NWIP ISO 8784-2 Microbiological examination - Part 2 Enumeration of
> bacteria, yeast and mould on surface
>
> This is a TC46/SC2 new work item proposal to develop a new standard
> Microbiological examination - Part 2 Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and
> mould on surface
>
> This part of ISO 8784 specifies a method for determining the bacteria,
> yeast and mould population on the surface of paper and paperboard. The
> enumeration relates to specific media. The standard is applicable to all
> kinds of paper and paperboard, to dry market pulp in sheet form and to
> packaging material. The first part of ISO
> 8784 deals with the enumeration of aerobic bacteria and bacterial spores
> in dry market pulp, paper and paperboard, and it is based on disintegration.
>
> If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name
> at least one expert who will work on this standard's development. If you
> would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact
> information in your comments, we are now also required to provide
> particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert's
> full name and email address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one
> of the following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think
> this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote
> yes or no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your
> Affirmative or Negative vote. Consider whether you think this standard will
> be used in the U.S.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> YES - approve this as a new project (comments required on justification
> statement; nominate expert(s) if you have one; comments on the working
> draft are encouraged but optional)
>
> NO - do not approve this as a new project (comments required on why)
>
> ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional)
>
>
>
> 2) ISO 8784-2 Pulp, paper and board - Microbiological examination - Part 2
> Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and mould on surface
>
> This is a TC46 SC10 new work item proposal to develop a new standard on
> ISO 8784-2 Pulp, paper and board - Microbiological examination - Part 2
> Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and mould on surface.
>
> This part of ISO 8784 specifies a method for determining the bacteria,
> yeast and mould population on the surface of paper and paperboard. The
> enumeration relates to specific media. The standard is applicable to all
> kinds of paper and paperboard, to dry market pulp in sheet form and to
> packaging material. The first part of ISO 8784 deals with the enumeration
> of aerobic bacteria and bacterial spores in dry market pulp, paper and
> paperboard, and it is based on disintegration.
>
> We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think
> this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote
> yes or no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your Yes or
> No vote. Consider whether you think this standard will be used in the U.S.
>
> If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name
> at least one expert who will work on this standard's development. If you
> would like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact
> information in your comments, we are now also required to provide
> particular information when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert's
> full name and email address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one
> of the following Stakeholder Categories:
>
> Industry and Commerce
> Government
> Consumers
> Labour
> Academic and Research Bodies
> Standards Application
> Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
>
> Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
>
> Your voting options are:
>
> Yes - approve the creation of this new project (Comments required
> regarding market relevance; expert nomination is necessary but optional.)
>
> No - do not approve this new project (Comments required on reasons why
> not.)
>
> Abstain from voting (comments optional)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
-------------- next part --------------

   Certainly an abstention here seems appropriate.
   timothy

   Timothy J. Dickey, Ph.D., MLIS.
   [1]tdickey1 at kent.edu
   (614) 785-1632
   On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Mark Needleman <[2]MNeedleman at flvc.org>
   wrote:

     that's cerainly the easy option - no comment required - I don't have a
     problem with that
     mark

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Thornburg,Gail [mailto:[3]thornbug at oclc.org]
   Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 10:23 AM
   To: Mark Needleman; '[4]asis-standards at asis.org'
   Subject: RE: new more votes
   I think we should abstain
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Asis-standards [mailto:[5]asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf
   Of Mark Needleman
   Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 10:05 AM
   To: '[6]asis-standards at asis.org'
   Subject: [Asis-standards] new more votes
   2 more upcoming votes ( last ones in 2015)
   Personally I don't feel qualified to judge the usefullness of eith or these
   Also relevant document attached to this note ( there are 2 separate votes
   but the document applies t oboth so I only included 1 copy)
   mark
   1)Â  NWIP ISO 8784-2 Microbiological examination - Part 2 Enumeration of
   bacteria, yeast and mould on surface
   This  is  a  TC46/SC2 new work item proposal to develop a new standard
   Microbiological examination - Part 2 Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and
   mould on surface
   This part of ISO 8784 specifies a method for determining the bacteria, yeast
   and mould population on the surface of paper and paperboard. The enumeration
   relates to specific media. The standard is applicable to all kinds of paper
   and paperboard, to dry market pulp in sheet form and to packaging material.
   The first part of ISO
   8784 deals with the enumeration of aerobic bacteria and bacterial spores in
   dry market pulp, paper and paperboard, and it is based on disintegration.
   If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name at
   least one expert who will work on this standard's development. If you would
   like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in
   your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information
   when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert's full name and email
   address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following
   Stakeholder Categories:
   Industry and Commerce
   Government
   Consumers
   Labour
   Academic and Research Bodies
   Standards Application
   Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
   Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
   We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think
   this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote
   yes  or  no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your
   Affirmative or Negative vote. Consider whether you think this standard will
   be used in the U.S.
   Your voting options are:
   YES - approve this as a new project (comments required on justification
   statement; nominate expert(s) if you have one; comments on the working draft
   are encouraged but optional)
   NO - do not approve this as a new project (comments required on why)
   ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional)
   2) ISO 8784-2 Pulp, paper and board - Microbiological examination - Part 2
   Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and mould on surface
   This is a TC46 SC10 new work item proposal to develop a new standard on ISO
   8784-2  Pulp,  paper  and board - Microbiological examination - Part 2
   Enumeration of bacteria, yeast and mould on surface.
   This part of ISO 8784 specifies a method for determining the bacteria, yeast
   and mould population on the surface of paper and paperboard. The enumeration
   relates to specific media. The standard is applicable to all kinds of paper
   and paperboard, to dry market pulp in sheet form and to packaging material.
   The first part of ISO 8784 deals with the enumeration of aerobic bacteria
   and bacterial spores in dry market pulp, paper and paperboard, and it is
   based on disintegration.
   We are also required to provide a justification statement for why we think
   this is or is not a worthwhile/useful project (depending on whether we vote
   yes or no). Please provide such a statement in the comments for your Yes or
   No vote. Consider whether you think this standard will be used in the U.S.
   If the US votes to approve this as a new project, we are expected to name at
   least one expert who will work on this standard's development. If you would
   like to nominate someone, please include the name and contact information in
   your comments, we are now also required to provide particular information
   when adding Experts to working groups: The Expert's full name and email
   address, a salutation (Dr., Ms., etc.) as well as one of the following
   Stakeholder Categories:
   Industry and Commerce
   Government
   Consumers
   Labour
   Academic and Research Bodies
   Standards Application
   Non-governmental Organization (NGO)
   Please obtain that person's agreement in advance to work on this project.
   Your voting options are:
   Yes - approve the creation of this new project (Comments required regarding
   market relevance; expert nomination is necessary but optional.)
   No - do not approve this new project (Comments required on reasons why not.)
   Abstain from voting (comments optional)
   _______________________________________________
   Asis-standards mailing list
   [7]Asis-standards at asis.org
   [8]http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards

References

   1. mailto:tdickey1 at kent.edu
   2. mailto:MNeedleman at flvc.org
   3. mailto:thornbug at oclc.org
   4. mailto:asis-standards at asis.org
   5. mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org
   6. mailto:asis-standards at asis.org
   7. mailto:Asis-standards at asis.org
   8. http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards