From mneedlem at ufl.edu Mon Jun 2 08:11:33 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes Message-ID: <017201cf7e5b$cb9a8960$62cf9c20$@ufl.edu> Some more votes coming up: (1st of 2 notes) 1) Nomination of Convenor for TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2 JWG to revise ISO 639 standards TC37/SC2 has primary responsibility for the ISO 639 series of standards on Codes for the representation of names of languages. TC46/SC4 is in liaison to this committee as it has a direct stakeholder interest in these standards. Some concerns had been expressed that TC46 members had not been sufficiently included in past revisions of the standard. So an agreement was made to create a Joint Working Group (JWG) between the two committees to do the next revisions to the standard. The document N919, included as a reference to this ballot is a report from the maintenance agencies for this standard series and provides background on the different parts and the standards' status. This NISO TC46 Ballot group previously voted on and approved the JWG and nominated several experts to participate. The first meeting of the group was held during TC46 meeting week in Washington DC on May 6. At the SC4 plenary meeting held on May 7, a resolution was passed: SC4 adopts the recommendation of the JWG that TC37/SC2 shall take the administration role in the TC37/SC2/JWG7 and that TC46/SC4 will appoint the Convenor [Chairperson]. ISO TC46/SC4 will nominate a candidate for Convenor, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2. SC4 asks its secretariat to identify and nominate a candidate that will serve as the Convenor of the Joint Working Group, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC 37/SC 2. TC46/SC4 is presenting Peter Constable as the nominee to be the convenor (chairperson) of the JWG. His background information is provided in the reference document "Notice of ballot to nominate..." Your voting options for this ballot are: YES - approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments optional) NO - do not approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments required) Comments due by June 19 (personally I don't have a problem with this) 2) SC11/WG8 Title/Scope Change and Leadership Nominations Several years ago SC11 moved their standards into "Management system standards" (MSS). In ISO, MSS are designed to provide a complementary group of standards that together "provide a model to follow when setting up and operating a management system"--in the SC11 instance on Records Management. Two WGs were established at that time to develop the underlying base standards for the MSS: WG8 Management systems for records - Fundamentals and vocabulary and WG9 Management systems for records - Requirements. Each of these groups completed their initial standard deliverable. For future deliverables, it was decided in a resolution at the May 8 meeting in Washington, DC that the two groups should merge into WG8 and the scope and title be modified accordingly. It was further resolved to nominate Carlota Bustelo (Spain) as Convenor and Judith Ellis (Australia) as Project Leader and Secretariat Support of WG8. See the reference document included with the ballot for more specifics on the new title and scope. This ballot is to ask for approval on this resolution. Your voting options are: YES - approve the scope/title change and the leadership (comments optional) NO - do not approve (comments required) Comments due by 6/19 ( again I don't see a problem with this) 3) NISO Board of Directors Vice Chair Election (2014-2015) Do you support the election of Mike Teets (OCLC) as NISO Vice Chair for the 2014-2015 term. Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws and following an open call for candidates, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidate for the position of Vice Chair of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The candidate will then become Chair of the NISO Board for the term from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, then serve one additional year as Past Chair. Voting members may select up to one candidate from this ballot. Mike Teets is the only candidate nominated ( but we do have the option of writing a name in if anyone has any thoughts on that Comments needed by 6/26 4) 2014 Official Ballot NISO Board of Directors Election Do you support the election of the following Directors for the 2012-2015 term? Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidates for the position of Director of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017. Voting members may select up to three candidates from this ballot. Comments due by 6/26 - my own personal sense is not to have 2 publisher representatives on the board as in the current list of candidates - we can vote fro up to 3 candidates either from those listed on we can write a name in Relevant documents attached to this note Mark Names are listed on the same document as for the Vice Chair Ballott -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2014 NISO BoD Election Ballot.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 116323 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Ballot - Nomination of JWG 639 Convenor.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 18201 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N1448_LB_on_WG8_new_title__scope_Form_0.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 315382 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mneedlem at ufl.edu Mon Jun 2 08:47:14 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] More votes part2 Message-ID: <018001cf7e60$c7b371e0$571a55a0$@ufl.edu> 2nd note on upcoming votes: - these are to keep the current ISO ILL standard active until the new one gets published and implemented 1) ISO/FDIS 10160, Interlibrary Loan Application Service Definition Do you approve ISO/FDIS 10160 for publication? This is the first of three ballots that make up the standard Information and documentation -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Interlibrary Loan Application. This ballot is for ISO/FDIS 10160, Interlibrary Loan Application Service Definition, which defines the required services for interlibrary loan. In the systematic review of these standards conducted in 2013, the members voted to Confirm them. The standard is being replaced with a new ILL standard (the forthcoming ISO 18626, Information and documentation -- Interlibrary Loan Transactions) and the agreement was that this existing series would be maintained for the time being, while it was still in use. Following the systematic review, the former maintenance agency pointed out some minor issues that could impact the standards' ongoing usage. These minor changes have been incorporated into the current draft standard at ballot, which has been issued immediately at the FDIS stage for approval. If approved, it will go directly to publication. Both the draft standard and a document describing the changes that were made are available from the ballot webpage and the link in the announcement email. Some corresponding changes to graphics were also made to match the textual changes that are noted in the change document. NISO is recommending that you vote YES on this ballot. Your voting options are: YES - approve the draft standard to go directly to publication (comments optional) NO - do not approve the standard (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 6/19 2) ISO/FDIS 10161-1, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 1: Protocol specification Do you approve ISO/FDIS 10161-1 for publication? This ballot is for ISO/FDIS 10161-1, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 1: Protocol specification, which provides a protocol utilizing the services defined in ISO 10160. In the systematic review of these standards conducted in 2013, the members voted to Confirm them. The standard is being replaced with a new ILL standard (the forthcoming ISO 18626, Information and documentation -- Interlibrary Loan Transactions) and the agreement was that this existing series would be maintained for the time being, while it was still in use. Following the systematic review, the former maintenance agency pointed out some minor issues that could impact the standards' ongoing usage. These minor changes have been incorporated into the current draft standard at ballot, which has been issued immediately at the FDIS stage for approval. If approved, it will go directly to publication. Both the draft standard and a document describing the changes that were made are available from the ballot webpage and the link in the announcement email. Some corresponding changes to graphics were also made to match the textual changes that are noted in the change document. NISO is recommending that you vote YES on this ballot. Your voting options are: YES - approve the draft standard to go directly to publication (comments optional) NO - do not approve the standard (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 6/19 3) ISO/FDIS 10161-2, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 2: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) proforma Do you approve ISO/FDIS 10161-2 for publication? This ballot is for ISO/FDIS 10161-2, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 2: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) proforma, which provides a template for indicating conformance to some or all requirements of the protocol (10161-1). In the systematic review of these standards conducted in 2013, the members voted to Confirm them. The standard is being replaced with a new ILL standard (the forthcoming ISO 18626, Information and documentation -- Interlibrary Loan Transactions) and the agreement was that this existing series would be maintained for the time being, while it was still in use. Following the systematic review, the former maintenance agency pointed out some minor issues that could impact the standards' ongoing usage. These minor changes have been incorporated into the current draft standard at ballot, which has been issued immediately at the FDIS stage for approval. If approved, it will go directly to publication. Both the draft standard and a document describing the changes that were made are available from the ballot webpage and the link in the announcement email. Some corresponding changes to graphics were also made to match the textual changes that are noted in the change document. NISO is recommending that you vote YES on this ballot. Your voting options are: YES - approve the draft standard to go directly to publication (comments optional) NO - do not approve the standard (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting (comments optional) Comments and a recommendation for a vote needed by 6/19 - All relevant documents attached - Note that NISO is recommending a YES vote on these but we are under no obligation to do so. Since I was involved with the development of these I would like some independent views on how we should vote mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_FDIS_10160_(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 3257492 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ISO_FDIS_10161-2_(E).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 573464 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N890_A_summary_of_minor_revisions_to_be_made_to_old_ILL_standards.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 34341 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thornbug at oclc.org Mon Jun 2 09:23:33 2014 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:23:33 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes In-Reply-To: <017201cf7e5b$cb9a8960$62cf9c20$@ufl.edu> References: <017201cf7e5b$cb9a8960$62cf9c20$@ufl.edu> Message-ID: <956b3e0723454a41a0d1e6569d591a06@BLUPR06MB194.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Ok with these -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman-UF Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:12 AM To: asis-standards at asis.org Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes Some more votes coming up: (1st of 2 notes) 1) Nomination of Convenor for TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2 JWG to revise ISO 639 standards TC37/SC2 has primary responsibility for the ISO 639 series of standards on Codes for the representation of names of languages. TC46/SC4 is in liaison to this committee as it has a direct stakeholder interest in these standards. Some concerns had been expressed that TC46 members had not been sufficiently included in past revisions of the standard. So an agreement was made to create a Joint Working Group (JWG) between the two committees to do the next revisions to the standard. The document N919, included as a reference to this ballot is a report from the maintenance agencies for this standard series and provides background on the different parts and the standards' status. This NISO TC46 Ballot group previously voted on and approved the JWG and nominated several experts to participate. The first meeting of the group was held during TC46 meeting week in Washington DC on May 6. At the SC4 plenary meeting held on May 7, a resolution was passed: SC4 adopts the recommendation of the JWG that TC37/SC2 shall take the administration role in the TC37/SC2/JWG7 and that TC46/SC4 will appoint the Convenor [Chairperson]. ISO TC46/SC4 will nominate a candidate for Convenor, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2. SC4 asks its secretariat to identify and nominate a candidate that will serve as the Convenor of the Joint Working Group, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC 37/SC 2. TC46/SC4 is presenting Peter Constable as the nominee to be the convenor (chairperson) of the JWG. His background information is provided in the reference document "Notice of ballot to nominate..." Your voting options for this ballot are: YES - approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments optional) NO - do not approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments required) Comments due by June 19 (personally I don't have a problem with this) 2) SC11/WG8 Title/Scope Change and Leadership Nominations Several years ago SC11 moved their standards into "Management system standards" (MSS). In ISO, MSS are designed to provide a complementary group of standards that together "provide a model to follow when setting up and operating a management system"--in the SC11 instance on Records Management. Two WGs were established at that time to develop the underlying base standards for the MSS: WG8 Management systems for records - Fundamentals and vocabulary and WG9 Management systems for records - Requirements. Each of these groups completed their initial standard deliverable. For future deliverables, it was decided in a resolution at the May 8 meeting in Washington, DC that the two groups should merge into WG8 and the scope and title be modified accordingly. It was further resolved to nominate Carlota Bustelo (Spain) as Convenor and Judith Ellis (Australia) as Project Leader and Secretariat Support of WG8. See the reference document included with the ballot for more specifics on the new title and scope. This ballot is to ask for approval on this resolution. Your voting options are: YES - approve the scope/title change and the leadership (comments optional) NO - do not approve (comments required) Comments due by 6/19 ( again I don't see a problem with this) 3) NISO Board of Directors Vice Chair Election (2014-2015) Do you support the election of Mike Teets (OCLC) as NISO Vice Chair for the 2014-2015 term. Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws and following an open call for candidates, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidate for the position of Vice Chair of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The candidate will then become Chair of the NISO Board for the term from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, then serve one additional year as Past Chair. Voting members may select up to one candidate from this ballot. Mike Teets is the only candidate nominated ( but we do have the option of writing a name in if anyone has any thoughts on that Comments needed by 6/26 4) 2014 Official Ballot NISO Board of Directors Election Do you support the election of the following Directors for the 2012-2015 term? Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidates for the position of Director of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017. Voting members may select up to three candidates from this ballot. Comments due by 6/26 - my own personal sense is not to have 2 publisher representatives on the board as in the current list of candidates - we can vote fro up to 3 candidates either from those listed on we can write a name in Relevant documents attached to this note Mark Names are listed on the same document as for the Vice Chair Ballott From mneedlem at ufl.edu Mon Jun 2 09:26:44 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISTC vote Message-ID: <019d01cf7e66$4c7eb510$e57c1f30$@ufl.edu> NISO did not get consensus on the ISTC standard and is asking members who voted CONFIRM to change their vote to REVISE The comments from voters who voted to revise are: Given lack of adoption and concerns expressed by others as well as the clear need for a usable standard a Revise decision seems the most appropriate route forward. If this standard is to be useful and adopted by the North American trade publishing industry it must be revised. There is little adoption at this point due to the complexity of the standard. Many trade publishers have had to create their own work ID because the ISTC was not adoptable. ISO 21047:2009 should be revised to determine if changes to the standard will increase its adoption.here is enough concern expressed by others that ALA supports a revision. In its current state, the ISTC standard is not addressing the market's needs sufficiently to generate the kind of enthusiasm necessary for broad adoption. A thorough exploration of what needs it should address and what problems it should resolve is needed. Stakeholders from various areas of the publishing industry should be involved in the revision process to come up with a revised standard that is truly helpful to the industry. Unfortunately I don't have any clear answer as to what needs to be changed specifically, but my overall sense is that the standards is too narrow and limiting in its current form, requiring significant research and manual effort and focusing on too narrow an area. This standard has not gained market recognition and needs revision to be usable. Limited adoption implies that the ISTC has not fulfilled its intended purpose. From other comments, it seems a revision that would address stakeholder concerns is needed. The community believes there is a need for a work identifier, yet ISTC is not widely implemented. The reality that ISTC has not been broadly implemented indicates, to me, that perhaps the standard needs investigation to see if a revision would help broaden adoption.\ My recollection of this standard in 2009 is that resolution (decoding) of the assigned ISTC was difficult if not impossible. In addition to the comments by publishers, any revision should include a streamlined and inexpensive means of access to the registry for look-ups of text metadata. The ISTC as it stands has not proven useful to the publishing community in the United States. Yet, most distributors, wholesalers, and retailers, are grouping products together using a parent work type function. This indicates that there is still the need for an identifier of groups of works, but that that ISTC in its current state is not serving this need. We have no obligation to change our vote - but I need recommendations by noon on 6/6 mark From baden.hughes at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 21:06:17 2014 From: baden.hughes at gmail.com (Baden Hughes) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:06:17 +1000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISTC vote In-Reply-To: <019d01cf7e66$4c7eb510$e57c1f30$@ufl.edu> References: <019d01cf7e66$4c7eb510$e57c1f30$@ufl.edu> Message-ID: In light of the comments from other NISO members, I'd be comfortable changing our vote to REVISE. Baden On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Mark Needleman-UF wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > Asis-standards mailing list > Asis-standards at asis.org > http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards > > From baden.hughes at gmail.com Mon Jun 2 21:12:13 2014 From: baden.hughes at gmail.com (Baden Hughes) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:12:13 +1000 Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes In-Reply-To: <956b3e0723454a41a0d1e6569d591a06@BLUPR06MB194.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> References: <017201cf7e5b$cb9a8960$62cf9c20$@ufl.edu> <956b3e0723454a41a0d1e6569d591a06@BLUPR06MB194.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf > Of Mark Needleman-UF > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:12 AM > To: asis-standards at asis.org > Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes > > Some more votes coming up: (1st of 2 notes) > > > > 1) Nomination of Convenor for TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2 JWG to revise ISO 639 > standards > > TC37/SC2 has primary responsibility for the ISO 639 series of standards on > Codes for the representation of names of languages. TC46/SC4 is in liaison > to this committee as it has a direct stakeholder interest in these > standards. Some concerns had been expressed that TC46 members had not been > sufficiently included in past revisions of the standard. So an agreement > was made to create a Joint Working Group (JWG) between the two committees > to do the next revisions to the standard. > > The document N919, included as a reference to this ballot is a report from > the maintenance agencies for this standard series and provides background > on the different parts and the standards' status. > > This NISO TC46 Ballot group previously voted on and approved the JWG and > nominated several experts to participate. The first meeting of the group > was held during TC46 meeting week in Washington DC on May 6. > > At the SC4 plenary meeting held on May 7, a resolution was passed: > SC4 adopts the recommendation of the JWG that TC37/SC2 shall take the > administration role in the TC37/SC2/JWG7 and that TC46/SC4 will appoint the > Convenor [Chairperson]. ISO TC46/SC4 will nominate a candidate for > Convenor, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2. SC4 asks its > secretariat to identify and nominate a candidate that will serve as the > Convenor of the Joint Working Group, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC > 37/SC 2. > > TC46/SC4 is presenting Peter Constable as the nominee to be the convenor > (chairperson) of the JWG. His background information is provided in the > reference document "Notice of ballot to nominate..." > > Your voting options for this ballot are: > YES - approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments optional) NO - > do not approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments required) > > Comments due by June 19 (personally I don't have a problem with this) > > I know Peter and his work well, and would absolutely support this nomination - uniquely qualified - ie I think we should vote YES. > 2) SC11/WG8 Title/Scope Change and Leadership Nominations > > Several years ago SC11 moved their standards into "Management system > standards" (MSS). In ISO, MSS are designed to provide a complementary group > of standards that together "provide a model to follow when setting up and > operating a management system"--in the SC11 instance on Records Management. > > Two WGs were established at that time to develop the underlying base > standards for the MSS: WG8 Management systems for records - Fundamentals > and vocabulary and WG9 Management systems for records - Requirements. Each > of these groups completed their initial standard deliverable. For future > deliverables, it was decided in a resolution at the May 8 meeting in > Washington, DC that the two groups should merge into WG8 and the scope and > title be modified accordingly. It was further resolved to nominate Carlota > Bustelo (Spain) as Convenor and Judith Ellis (Australia) as Project Leader > and Secretariat Support of WG8. See the reference document included with > the ballot for more specifics on the new title and scope. > > This ballot is to ask for approval on this resolution. Your voting options > are: YES - approve the scope/title change and the leadership (comments > optional) NO - do not approve (comments required) > > Comments due by 6/19 ( again I don't see a problem with this) > Again, knowing a little of the history and one of the convenors, I think we should vote YES. > 3) NISO Board of Directors Vice Chair Election (2014-2015) > > > Do you support the election of Mike Teets (OCLC) as NISO Vice Chair for the > 2014-2015 term. > > > Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws and following an open call for candidates, the > Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the > following candidate for the position of Vice Chair of NISO for the term > from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The candidate will then become Chair of > the NISO Board for the term from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, then serve > one additional year as Past Chair. > > Voting members may select up to one candidate from this ballot. > > Mike Teets is the only candidate nominated ( but we do have the option of > writing a name in if anyone has any thoughts on that > > > Comments needed by 6/26 > No particular issues with this, I don't know Mike personally, but he has the right profile. 4) 2014 Official Ballot NISO Board of Directors Election > > Do you support the election of the following Directors for the 2012-2015 > term? > > Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO > Board of Directors puts forward the following candidates for the position > of Director of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017. Voting > members may select up to three candidates from this ballot. > > Comments due by 6/26 - my own personal sense is not to have 2 publisher > representatives on the board as in the current list of candidates - we can > vote fro up to 3 candidates either from those listed on we can write a name > in > > Relevant documents attached to this note > I agree on the principle of balance that we should not have 2 publisher reps, except if they have completely divergent interests. I don't see that here between Elsevier and EBSCO. Pick either one, and then go with the Loyola and ITHAKA reps. Baden From mneedlem at ufl.edu Mon Jun 2 21:52:25 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes In-Reply-To: References: <017201cf7e5b$cb9a8960$62cf9c20$@ufl.edu> <956b3e0723454a41a0d1e6569d591a06@BLUPR06MB194.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Message-ID: <9DE91BAD-E38D-4DA0-9B3D-234F1695EFCE@ufl.edu> Thanks for the input Mark Sent from Mark Needleman's iPhone On Jun 2, 2014, at 9:12 PM, Baden Hughes wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman-UF >> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:12 AM >> To: asis-standards at asis.org >> Subject: [Asis-standards] more votes >> >> Some more votes coming up: (1st of 2 notes) >> >> >> >> 1) Nomination of Convenor for TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2 JWG to revise ISO 639 standards >> >> TC37/SC2 has primary responsibility for the ISO 639 series of standards on Codes for the representation of names of languages. TC46/SC4 is in liaison to this committee as it has a direct stakeholder interest in these standards. Some concerns had been expressed that TC46 members had not been sufficiently included in past revisions of the standard. So an agreement was made to create a Joint Working Group (JWG) between the two committees to do the next revisions to the standard. >> >> The document N919, included as a reference to this ballot is a report from the maintenance agencies for this standard series and provides background on the different parts and the standards' status. >> >> This NISO TC46 Ballot group previously voted on and approved the JWG and nominated several experts to participate. The first meeting of the group was held during TC46 meeting week in Washington DC on May 6. >> >> At the SC4 plenary meeting held on May 7, a resolution was passed: >> SC4 adopts the recommendation of the JWG that TC37/SC2 shall take the administration role in the TC37/SC2/JWG7 and that TC46/SC4 will appoint the Convenor [Chairperson]. ISO TC46/SC4 will nominate a candidate for Convenor, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2. SC4 asks its secretariat to identify and nominate a candidate that will serve as the Convenor of the Joint Working Group, for approval by both TC46/SC4 and TC 37/SC 2. >> >> TC46/SC4 is presenting Peter Constable as the nominee to be the convenor >> (chairperson) of the JWG. His background information is provided in the reference document "Notice of ballot to nominate..." >> >> Your voting options for this ballot are: >> YES - approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments optional) NO - do not approve Peter Constable as the JWG convenor (comments required) >> >> Comments due by June 19 (personally I don't have a problem with this) > > I know Peter and his work well, and would absolutely support this nomination - uniquely qualified - ie I think we should vote YES. > >> >> 2) SC11/WG8 Title/Scope Change and Leadership Nominations >> >> Several years ago SC11 moved their standards into "Management system standards" (MSS). In ISO, MSS are designed to provide a complementary group of standards that together "provide a model to follow when setting up and operating a management system"--in the SC11 instance on Records Management. >> >> Two WGs were established at that time to develop the underlying base standards for the MSS: WG8 Management systems for records - Fundamentals and vocabulary and WG9 Management systems for records - Requirements. Each of these groups completed their initial standard deliverable. For future deliverables, it was decided in a resolution at the May 8 meeting in Washington, DC that the two groups should merge into WG8 and the scope and title be modified accordingly. It was further resolved to nominate Carlota Bustelo (Spain) as Convenor and Judith Ellis (Australia) as Project Leader and Secretariat Support of WG8. See the reference document included with the ballot for more specifics on the new title and scope. >> >> This ballot is to ask for approval on this resolution. Your voting options >> are: YES - approve the scope/title change and the leadership (comments optional) NO - do not approve (comments required) >> >> Comments due by 6/19 ( again I don't see a problem with this) > > Again, knowing a little of the history and one of the convenors, I think we should vote YES. > >> 3) NISO Board of Directors Vice Chair Election (2014-2015) >> >> >> Do you support the election of Mike Teets (OCLC) as NISO Vice Chair for the >> 2014-2015 term. >> >> >> Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws and following an open call for candidates, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidate for the position of Vice Chair of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The candidate will then become Chair of the NISO Board for the term from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, then serve one additional year as Past Chair. >> >> Voting members may select up to one candidate from this ballot. >> >> Mike Teets is the only candidate nominated ( but we do have the option of writing a name in if anyone has any thoughts on that >> >> >> Comments needed by 6/26 > > No particular issues with this, I don't know Mike personally, but he has the right profile. > >> 4) 2014 Official Ballot NISO Board of Directors Election >> >> Do you support the election of the following Directors for the 2012-2015 term? >> >> Pursuant to the NISO Bylaws, the Nominations Subcommittee of the NISO Board of Directors puts forward the following candidates for the position of Director of NISO for the term from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2017. Voting members may select up to three candidates from this ballot. >> >> Comments due by 6/26 - my own personal sense is not to have 2 publisher representatives on the board as in the current list of candidates - we can vote fro up to 3 candidates either from those listed on we can write a name in >> >> Relevant documents attached to this note > > I agree on the principle of balance that we should not have 2 publisher reps, except if they have completely divergent interests. I don't see that here between Elsevier and EBSCO. Pick either one, and then go with the Loyola and ITHAKA reps. > > Baden From MNeedleman at flvc.org Fri Jun 6 07:45:28 2014 From: MNeedleman at flvc.org (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:45:28 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISTC vote Message-ID: Folks I just changed our vote on the ISTC from CONFIRM to REVISE mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Tue Jun 10 12:41:54 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] TC46 2014 meeting reports Message-ID: <00e401cf84ca$e5d9a520$b18cef60$@ufl.edu> In case anyone is interested I have attached 2 reports from the TC46 meeting that was recently held in DC mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TC46_HoD_Report_2014.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 770278 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TC46_SC4_HoD_Report_2014.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 288924 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thornbug at oclc.org Tue Jun 10 13:29:15 2014 From: thornbug at oclc.org (Thornburg,Gail) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:29:15 +0000 Subject: [Asis-standards] TC46 2014 meeting reports In-Reply-To: <00e401cf84ca$e5d9a520$b18cef60$@ufl.edu> References: <00e401cf84ca$e5d9a520$b18cef60$@ufl.edu> Message-ID: <87c83fe0521549a0a136c8d5e88925f5@CO1PR06MB205.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> Thanks, I was wanting to see those -----Original Message----- From: Asis-standards [mailto:asis-standards-bounces at asis.org] On Behalf Of Mark Needleman-UF Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 12:42 PM To: asis-standards at asis.org Subject: [Asis-standards] TC46 2014 meeting reports In case anyone is interested I have attached 2 reports from the TC46 meeting that was recently held in DC mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Thu Jun 12 10:30:36 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] one more TC46 report Message-ID: <01ec01cf864a$e11056c0$a3310440$@ufl.edu> I just got another report from the TC46 plenary - I attached it mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TC46_SC11_HoD_Report_2014.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 841044 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mneedlem at ufl.edu Fri Jun 13 13:46:17 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO votes Message-ID: <341B8B9E-8C5C-4CC8-948A-332732818E0B@ufl.edu> Folks hearing no objections and some expression of support I just cast the following 2 YES votes Nomination of Peter Constable as the Convenor for TC46/SC4 and TC37/SC2 JWG to revise ISO 639 standards SC11/WG8 Title/Scope Change and Leadership Nominations mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Thu Jun 19 07:38:12 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] ISO ILL vote Message-ID: <017401cf8bb2$f42811e0$dc7835a0$@ufl.edu> Folks Hearing no objections (or comments) I just voted YES on ISO/FDIS 10160, Interlibrary Loan Application Service Definition ISO/FDIS 10161-1, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 1: Protocol specification ISO/FDIS 10161-2, Interlibrary Loan Application Protocol Specification -- Part 2: Protocol implementation conformance statement (PICS) proforma This is to allow them to remain active during the period when the new ISO ILL standard ISO 18626 is being implemented NISO recommended that members vote YES on these 3 standards If anyone does have any comments we have until tomorrow to change our votes mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Mon Jun 23 14:19:18 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] another TC46 mtg report Message-ID: <00bf01cf8f0f$a61e78d0$f25b6a70$@ufl.edu> You might be interested in this mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: TC46_SC8_HoD_Report_2014.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1375319 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mneedlem at ufl.edu Thu Jun 26 10:14:06 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] NISO Board votes Message-ID: <021501cf9148$e4b36a70$ae1a3f50$@ufl.edu> Folks I just cast the following votes for the NISO Board of Directors Elections NISO Board of Directors Vice Chair Election (2014-2015) - Mike Teets (OCLC) (he was the only candidate) NISO Board of Directors (2014-2015 term) Oliver Pesch (EBSCO) Barbara Preece (Loyola Notre Dame Library) Jabin White (ITHAKA) The candidate I didn't vote for was Chris Shillum (Elsevier) If anyone thinks we should vote for that person instead of the 3 above we can change our vote until tomorrow night - Also we can write in names if anyone has any candidates they would like to propose mark From mneedlem at ufl.edu Thu Jun 26 10:30:05 2014 From: mneedlem at ufl.edu (Mark Needleman-UF) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Asis-standards] New ISO vote Message-ID: <022701cf914b$236ca090$6a45e1b0$@ufl.edu> ISO/CD 11799, Information and documentation - Document storage requirements for archive and library materials This International Standard specifies the characteristics of repositories used for the long-term storage of archive and library materials. It covers the siting and construction of the building and the installation and equipment to be used both within and around the building. It applies to all archive and library materials held in repositories, where mixed media may be stored together with standard paper-based formats. It does not preclude the establishment of separate areas or compartments within individual repositories, where the environment can be controlled to create conditions suitable for the needs of specific archive materials. A copy of the draft standard is available from the link on the ballot webpage and in the announcement e-mail. Your voting options are: YES - approve for advancement as a Draft International Standard (comments optional) NO - do not approve for advancement (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting This International Standard specifies the characteristics of repositories used for the long-term storage of archive and library materials. It covers the siting and construction of the building and the installation and equipment to be used both within and around the building. It applies to all archive and library materials held in repositories, where mixed media may be stored together with standard paper-based formats. It does not preclude the establishment of separate areas or compartments within individual repositories, where the environment can be controlled to create conditions suitable for the needs of specific archive materials. A copy of the draft standard is available from the link on the ballot webpage and in the announcement e-mail. Your voting options are: YES - approve for advancement as a Draft International Standard (comments optional) NO - do not approve for advancement (comments required) ABSTAIN from voting I have attached the draft document to this note I need comments and a recommendation for a vote by July 13th mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: N45_ISOCD_11799__Information_and_documentat.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 278884 bytes Desc: not available URL: