[Asis-standards] ISO Systematic Review Votes

[Baden Hughes]

Comments on some of the latest batch, sent a few weeks ago ...

I'll separately look at ISO 15924 - Codes for the representation of names
of scripts; its an area I have expertise in, and I'm almost certain I've
sent feedback previously.

Baden

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Baden Hughes <baden.hughes at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Asis-standards] lots of ISO votes - part one of several emails
To: Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu>
Cc: asis-standards at asis.org


Hi all

> 1) Systematic Review of ISO 5122:1979, Documentation -- Abstract sheets in
> serial publications

I am suggesting Withdraw -- I have general questions of continued
relevance of this standard, there may be others who have an
alternative opinion. If its kept, then I'd recommend Revise if only to
update some of the references to more recently emergent and updated
standards.

> 2) "Systematic Review of ISO 7144:1986, Documentation -- Presentation of
> theses and similar documents"

I am suggesting Revise -- particularly since there are now a
predominance of electronic theses which have obvious modality and
other documentation/description elements that are not represented in
this much older standard.

> 3) "Systematic Review of ISO 7275:1985, Documentation -- Presentation of
> title information of series"

I am suggesting Withdraw -- I have general questions of continued
relevance of this standard, there may be others who have an
alternative opinion. If its kept, then I'd recommend Revise if only to
update some of the references to more recently emergent and updated
standards.

> 4) Systematic Review of ISO 18:1981, Documentation -- Contents list of
> periodicals"

I am suggesting Withdraw -- I have general questions of continued
relevance of this standard, there may be others who have an
alternative opinion

> 5) "Systematic Review of ISO 1086:1991, Information and documentation --
> Title leaves of books"

I'm suggesting Revise if only to update some of the references to more
recently emergent and updated standards.

Regards

Baden


On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Mark Needleman <mneedlem at ufl.edu> wrote:

> Folks
>
> there are a bunch of ISO systematic review votes due at the end of August:
> ( these are all existing standards up for review)
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 5122:1979, Documentation -- Abstract sheets in
> serial publications
>
>  Systematic Review of ISO 7144:1986, Documentation -- Presentation of
> theses and similar documents
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 7275:1985, Documentation -- Presentation of title
> information of series
>
>  Systematic Review of ISO 18:1981, Documentation -- Contents list of
> periodicals
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 1086:1991, Information and documentation -- Title
> leaves of books
>
> ***Systematic Review of ISO 15924:2004, Information and documentation --
> Codes for the representation of names of scripts
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 5123:1984, Documentation -- Headers for
> microfiche of monographs and serials
>
>  Systematic Review of ISO 215:1986, Documentation -- Presentation of
> contributions to periodicals and other serials
>
>  Systematic Review of ISO 6357:1985, Documentation -- Spine titles on
> books and other publications
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 2384:1977, Documentation -- Presentation of
> translations
>
> Systematic Review of ISO 7220:1996, Information and documentation --
> Presentation of catalogues of standards
>
> I dont recall if i sent you copies of any of these - but if i didnt and
> anyone wants a copy of any of these let me know.
>
> My recommendation is that we abstain from all of them due to lack of
> expertise (although if anyone has any opinion on how we should vote let me
> know
>
> The one exception to this is ISO 15924 - Codes for the representation of
> names of scripts - which we may want to vote on. I have attached a copy of
> the current version of the standard to this message
>
> I need comments and opinions by 8/30
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asis-standards mailing list
> Asis-standards at asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/asis-standards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------